14 Oct '18 14:41>
@fmf saidResponding to threats of physical violence.
"Doing" what?
Aren't you following the thread of discussion?
@fmf saidResponding to threats of physical violence.
"Doing" what?
@fmf saidWhat are you talkin about?
"Defend" myself in online discussions? What are you talking about?
@dj2becker saidWether or not it (your posting exchange to Romans1009 at the time) was “trolling” is irrelevant; what you did was try to use the suicide of my birth mother to manipulate the discussion and score some cheap internet points.
So I trolled divegeester when I mentioned something that he clearly described for everybody, by his own volition, but you weren't trolling me when you kept on bringing up something repeatedly that I had described?
@divegeester saidI am the only one that knows what my intentions were, and they were not to troll you or score points. You are free to believe what you want.
Wether or not it (your posting exchange to Romans1009 at the t8me) was “trolling” is irrelevant; what you did was try to use the suicide of my birth mother to manipulate the discussion and score some cheap internet points.
@secondson saidOnline threats of violence are laughable - they signal 'defeat'. That's the thread of our conversation, isn't it?
Responding to threats of physical violence.
Aren't you following the thread of discussion?
@secondson saidWhy would I be too "timid" to defend myself in online discussions?
Are you sure you're not having feelings about wanting to defend yourself, but are too timid?
@dj2becker saidYour interplay with the sour and isolated troll Romans1009 at the time was completely revealing of your intent; if it were otherwise your subsequent posting behaviour would have indicated your true intent. It hasn’t.
I am the only one that knows what my intentions were, and they were not to troll you or score points. You are free to believe what you want.
@divegeester saidWhatever you say Dr Phil.
Your interplay with the sour and isolated troll Romans1009 at the time was completely revealing of your intent; if it were otherwise your subsequent posting behaviour would have indicated your true intent. It hasn’t.
@divegeester saidLater, he refused to apologize - even after his mistake about what your childhood had actually been like was reiterated to him - because he said you "might have been lying" about your mother's suicide. I'll say this at the risk of being accused of being a conspiracy theorist by sonship: it spoke volumes about his character.
Your interplay with the sour and isolated troll Romans1009 at the time was completely revealing of your intent; if it were otherwise your subsequent posting behaviour would have indicated your true intent. It hasn’t.
@dj2becker saidYou and Romans1009 dipped your forum sword in the blood of my deceased mother and publicly smeared it on this forum in order to score cheap internet points. Everyone read it; you and he are not derided here for no reason.
Whatever you say Dr Phil.
@divegeester saidWhen all else fails play the victim card.
You and Romans1009 dipped your forum sword in the blood of my deceased mother and publicly smeared it on this forum in order to score cheap internet points. Everyone read it; you and he are not derided here for no reason.
@badradger saidyou have more time than you think.. a lot can be achieved in 2 years. It all starts in the mind
to late damage done call it greed or addiction its a recovery mission now, make the most of the time I have left.
@secondson said"It works"
You are doing the right thing by identifying and acknowledging the truth about your condition. Support in "therapeutic sessions" with others is a powerful tool on the path of recovery. I've been there. It works.
There's an added benefit though that you will discover after you get you feet back on the ground.
@secondson saidlie much?
Not really. I'm more interested in what you have to say about yourself.