1. Standard memberfrogstomp
    Bruno's Ghost
    In a hot place
    Joined
    11 Sep '04
    Moves
    7707
    29 Jul '06 23:38
    Anybody want to talk about his crimes against humanity too?
  2. Standard memberspiritmangr8ness
    Doh!!! Or--Are--I
    Springfield, USA
    Joined
    22 Jun '06
    Moves
    5936
    29 Jul '06 23:57
    Originally posted by frogstomp
    Anybody want to talk about his crimes against humanity too?
    No crimes; where there's no law!
  3. Standard memberfrogstomp
    Bruno's Ghost
    In a hot place
    Joined
    11 Sep '04
    Moves
    7707
    30 Jul '06 00:33
    Originally posted by spiritmangr8ness
    No crimes; where there's no law!
    No??
    The latter category was defined as follow: "Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation or other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

    and besides that the people being murdered had laws against them being murdered
  4. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    30 Jul '06 02:291 edit
    Originally posted by frogstomp
    Anybody want to talk about his crimes against humanity too?
    Morality devoid of God is relative. If his crimes were OK with him and his gang all's good with the world......That is assuming he got away with those crimes, but I think thats only common sense.🙄

    Edit: And yes I'm a silly man, so no need to remind me again!!!!
  5. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    30 Jul '06 02:37
    Originally posted by frogstomp
    No??
    The latter category was defined as follow: "Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation or other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of t ...[text shortened]... ated.

    and besides that the people being murdered had laws against them being murdered
    Other than that I hear he was a nice guy. Now froggy, ours is not to judge. Where are your Christian manners..........you are a Christian are'nt you? 😲
  6. Standard memberRBHILL
    Acts 13:48
    California
    Joined
    21 May '03
    Moves
    223260
    30 Jul '06 05:16
    Originally posted by frogstomp
    Anybody want to talk about his crimes against humanity too?
    Well I forgive him for the sins he has done and I also forgive you for all the ones you have done.
  7. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    30 Jul '06 05:57
    Originally posted by RBHILL
    Well I forgive him for the sins he has done and I also forgive you for all the ones you have done.
    I don't forgive you for being a self-righteous ass. Guess you are going to hell.
  8. Joined
    30 Sep '04
    Moves
    12010
    30 Jul '06 13:08
    Originally posted by frogstomp
    Anybody want to talk about his crimes against humanity too?
    One of the things with many stories from the Old Testament, is that there were prophets or leaders who believed in One God trusted in One God, and yet did not protray ethical or moral behaviour, it is not enough to believe in One God, trust in One God, without the Good works!
    There have been many leaders who believed in One God, trusted in One God, and lead people into war!!!!!!! Do we have a Moses of today or a Joshua?

    Peace IS the way

    gil
  9. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    148570
    30 Jul '06 14:14
    Originally posted by frogstomp
    No??
    The latter category was defined as follow: "Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation or other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of t ...[text shortened]... ated.

    and besides that the people being murdered had laws against them being murdered
    Do all laws apply to you world wide? Do all punishments apply to you
    that are applied throughout the world? What keeps you free of some
    laws and under others?
    Kelly
  10. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    148570
    30 Jul '06 14:16
    Originally posted by gentlegil
    One of the things with many stories from the Old Testament, is that there were prophets or leaders who believed in One God trusted in One God, and yet did not protray ethical or moral behaviour, it is not enough to believe in One God, trust in One God, without the Good works!
    There have been many leaders who believed in One God, trusted in One God, and lead people into war!!!!!!! Do we have a Moses of today or a Joshua?

    Peace IS the way

    gil
    Who gets to define the terms of peace?
    Kelly
  11. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    30 Jul '06 18:54
    Originally posted by frogstomp
    Anybody want to talk about his crimes against humanity too?
    Do you think he was a bigger cruminal as Moses or when he played the part of Ben Hur?
  12. Fleet, Hampshire
    Joined
    01 Jun '06
    Moves
    21670
    30 Jul '06 19:08
    Originally posted by KellyJay
    Who gets to define the terms of peace?
    Kelly
    Peace is common sense, people should be able to live together no matter what your religious bias is.
  13. Standard memberspiritmangr8ness
    Doh!!! Or--Are--I
    Springfield, USA
    Joined
    22 Jun '06
    Moves
    5936
    30 Jul '06 19:13
    Originally posted by frogstomp
    No??
    The latter category was defined as follow: "Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation or other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of t ...[text shortened]... ated.

    and besides that the people being murdered had laws against them being murdered
    Well maybe it occurs to me that Moses had God's favor. Moses is the Law giver, because God gave the Law to Moses. Before then there was only the law of lesser gods and men! If men have to die in the scheme of God'd purpose then is it not a dangerous suppositon to think that his agent is a crinimal?
  14. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    30 Jul '06 20:051 edit
    Originally posted by frogstomp
    Anybody want to talk about his crimes against humanity too?
    Froggy, the Old Testament accounts of the conquest of the Holy Land are often attacked for being unjust just as you continuously banter about as being. However, do you know the history behind the Holy Land? Why not look at Wiki and learn yourself a thing or two?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_ancient_Israel_and_Judah

    It appears as though the original inhabitants of the Holy Land were the descendants of Shem and Arhphaxad (ancestors of the Hebrews) because this land was originally alloted to them as an inheritance. However, Canaan and his son Sidon, who received another inheritance, decided to wrongfully take away Shem and Arphaxad's inheritance in additon to their own. They then became known as the Caananites. This is actually not written about in the Bible but is aluded to in Genesis 12:6 "the Canaanite were then in the land" which carried the connotation of "then but not before" as opposed to "then but not now". This was actually written about in other ancient historical accounts such as the Book of Jubilee, the Kebra Nagast, Rashi, and the Tanakh. It seems as though it were theCanaanites, not the Hebrews, who invaded the land originally and who killed off or chased away their Shemite counterparts. The Philistines were the only other people in the land during the Israelite reoccupation of the land which was originally allooted to them as an inheritance. The Philistines, however, were a Sea People who subsequently swept across Asia Minor and into the Mediterranean in about 1185 BCE. They to were invaders and conquerers of the land as well as their Canaanites counterparts. Considering all of these facts it gives a whole new light of the justice of their actions in the reclaiming their rightful inheritance, no?
  15. Standard memberfrogstomp
    Bruno's Ghost
    In a hot place
    Joined
    11 Sep '04
    Moves
    7707
    30 Jul '06 22:41
    Originally posted by whodey
    Froggy, the Old Testament accounts of the conquest of the Holy Land are often attacked for being unjust just as you continuously banter about as being. However, do you know the history behind the Holy Land? Why not look at Wiki and learn yourself a thing or two?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_ancient_Israel_and_Judah

    It appears as though the ...[text shortened]... w light of the justice of their actions in the reclaiming their rightful inheritance, no?
    No
Back to Top