-Removed-Be clear yourself here too, are you suggesting the Bible isn't trustworthy?
Are you asking, can we be unsure about parts of it as true to the best of our understanding?
There is a difference, if you attempting to suggest we agree it isn't trustworthy, put me down
as a no, it is. If you are asking do we have to understand and accept all parts we may have
an issue with, it depends on the parts. Which would mean some things are not as
important and others and you could put me down as a yes.
1 edit
-Removed-I think you are jumping to a conclusion.
The OP as I read it asked a question ... WHY?
I didn't see the issue being possible or not possible ... but why not trust all of the Scriptures ? Which is a perfectly valid question.
The emphasis is mine below on the OP.
If you don't believe the entire Bible is divinely inspired and is completely trustworthy in totality, ... WHY ... do you believe any of it at all?
It makes absolutely no sense to pick only the parts you like and brush the parts you don't like under the carpet and pretend that they don't exist. That is the most intellectually dishonest behavior I have ever seen. It's either all or nothing.
I don't see dj2becker's point to be other than asking the doubter to explain his rationale for his lingering mistrust in God's word.
Originally posted by @velnsWhich 'all or nothing experiences' are you specifically talking about? The cult I was a part of used to enforce rules that weren't in the Bible.
I don’t carry a strong opinion on this topic but I do remember you describing your all or nothing experiences in a Christian cult and I therefore find myself very surprised to see you propsosing the same cultish philosophy in your approach to the bible.
Originally posted by @rajk999Sure and if you believe the gospel writers were divinely inspired to accurately convey those words why wouldn't the rest of the Bible also be divinely inspired? Do you believe the gospel writers were only divinely inspired while they were writing down the words of Jesus and not the rest of the time?
Jesus Christ has the words of eternal life.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou asked a question. I answered
Sure and if you believe the gospel writers were divinely inspired to accurately convey those words why wouldn't the rest of the Bible also be divinely inspired? Do you believe the gospel writers were only divinely inspired while they were writing down the words of Jesus and not the rest of the time?
I asked a question. You ignored it
You are asking another question.
What you you think I should do?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerThis was answered already. Jesus said to trust him. Trust him means trusting in his words in particularly those words what lead to eternal life. Jesus words are spirit and life. They give eternal life.
You seem to be totally missing the point as usual. The reason for the OP was to establish how those (who don't trust all of the Bible) know which parts to trust and which parts to distrust.
Originally posted by @rajk999So do you believe only the words of Jesus happen to be divinely inspired and the rest of the Bible isn't or am I missing something?
This was answered already. Jesus said to trust him. Trust him means trusting in his words in particularly those words what lead to eternal life. Jesus words are spirit and life. They give eternal life.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYes you are missing some brains.
So do you believe only the words of Jesus happen to be divinely inspired and the rest of the Bible isn't or am I missing something?
All divinely inspired words do not lead to eternal life
Jesus has the words of eternal life.