Originally posted by PsychoPawnwell from expierencing the pwoer of the holy spirit I would rather take the risk that being a follower of christ I am wrong then a follow of budda or muslim or anything else.
My sins aren't covered by jesus, but they are covered under my state farm insurance policy.
Aren't you taking the chance that other religions aren't right? Why take that risk?
Originally posted by PsychoPawnThis is the same argument as "If he wants me to believe in him, why doesn't he show himself?"
You said that god wants us all to come to repentance. He doesn't care if you come to repentance after a couple years in hell even if you truly and sincerely repent?
It's not a test of intelligence, it's a test of faith.
Naturally, this involves some measure of humility, and that's where most people fail.
Much like "people in hell want ice water, too", I'm pretty sure that people in hell will also truly and sincerely want to repent. But just like the Super Bowl, you can't make your bet after the game is over.
He does want us all to come to repentance. That's why you are given plenty of time to make your decision. But life is short, and sometimes shorter than we had planned. That's why making the choice now is so important.
Originally posted by SuzianneSo God is a bookie?
Much like "people in hell want ice water, too", I'm pretty sure that people in hell will also truly and sincerely want to repent. But just like the Super Bowl, you can't make your bet after the game is over.
Why the limited time period? Why the 'test of faith'? And most importantly with regards to this thread, why the apparent punishment for failing the test?
Originally posted by twhiteheadThe "limited" time period is one's whole life. You could call that limited if you want, I guess. Most people find it is time enough to decide.
So God is a bookie?
Why the limited time period? Why the 'test of faith'? And most importantly with regards to this thread, why the apparent punishment for failing the test?
The punishment is not for failing the test of faith. The punishment is for sin. Sin is abhorrent to God, and it requires a price. God sent His Son to earth to pay for your sin in your stead. If you reject that gift, then the price of sin still must be paid.
Originally posted by Suzianne
This is the same argument as "If he wants me to believe in him, why doesn't he show himself?"
It's not a test of intelligence, it's a test of faith.
Naturally, this involves some measure of humility, and that's where most people fail.
Much like "people in hell want ice water, too", I'm pretty sure that people in hell will also truly and sincerely w ...[text shortened]... imes shorter than we had planned. That's why making the choice now is so important.
This man might have died without Jesus?
Originally posted by RBHILLWell, as the interviewer said, "You're a nice guy, I don't want to see you get what you deserve".
no he did die. I get e-mials from Way of the master and they said he died.
It was his choice. Ultimately, that is what free will is all about.
Sure, you might say it was a completely uninformed choice. But the interviewer tried to inform the man and was rebuffed. Who knows how many others tried to educate this man. If he died without Jesus, it was his choice.
Originally posted by sonhouseTo keep the masses in check (in fear). Simple, gay answer, I know, but thats about it, wouldn't you say? If criminals had nothing to fear in the afterlife they may commit more crime and other such indoctrination techniques,blah,blah... (I'm lazy)
Why such a perverted concept? Why would a god wish something like that on humanity?
Originally posted by twhiteheadQuite right. Many parents perpetuate the myth to their children, despite not belieiveing it themselves.
Yes that is true, though as I pointed out, many parents still perpetuate the claim even when they don't believe it themselves.
Also, Church leaders act very much like parents in that they tell their flock things they do not believe themselves but that they believe will result in preferred behavior. It must be noted that 'preferred behavior' is what is desired by the Church leader / parent, not necessarily what is best for the child / flock.
Why would you bother?
I told my 4 and a ahlf year old that santa was not real. Everyone around him was like "Whats santa bringing you?",ad nauseum.
Little did they know that I had already told my son that santa was just his mum and me . Of course it made sense to him.He worked it out, at his age, very quickly too , that parents sneaking pressies under the tree on xmas eve was a way more plausible explanation than this fat man going to everyhouse on the one night 🙄
Hard working parents, doing those extra hours to make a special dinner and maybe get that special bike for little Jimmy, because Jimmy improved so much on his academic results this term.
Shouldn't this type of parent get some acknowledgement and feel apart of the process of giving and recieving?, rather than the pressies being attributed to a false entity who seems to steal energy and give nothing back.
An entity that is portrayed the world over in supermarket malls around December, an entity that parents dont mind leatting their kids think its real, when they are toddlers- 5 pr 6 years old, just before the age of reason.
I'm very vigilante with my kids in teaching them that much of tv is make believe , and until they understand this, (age of reason), then there is potentially bad forces at work in the immature mind of the child. I think thats why they have no ads during childrens programs in Denmark,(or scandenavia?), anyway, they dont give a crap here in Australia.If anything , its getting ramped up. and pay tv is no better, it has ads too.
Originally posted by karoly aczelit is funny that you say gay. if you were around my atheist cousin he would say i have gay friends don't uses that. LOL.
To keep the masses in check (in fear). Simple, gay answer, I know, but thats about it, wouldn't you say? If criminals had nothing to fear in the afterlife they may commit more crime and other such indoctrination techniques,blah,blah... (I'm lazy)