Why Muffy does not exist...

Originally posted by telerion
No I have continually cited Coletti. See my deductive proof in the FAQ "Why I am a Muffin."

This arose out of "An Analogy of Faith" in which Coletti made the statement that the natural was evidence of the supernatural. Dj2 agreed with Coletti.

Anyway, dj2's post gave his position away anyhow so it hardly matters anymore.

This arose out of "An Analogy of Faith" in which Coletti made the statement that the natural was evidence of the supernatural. Dj2 agreed with Coletti.

Did you see me nodding my head behind my computer monitor?

Anyway, dj2's post gave his position away anyhow so it hardly matters anymore.

Please point out where and when I did this. It sure matters if I didn't say this.

Originally posted by dj2becker
[b]This arose out of "An Analogy of Faith" in which Coletti made the statement that the natural was evidence of the supernatural. Dj2 agreed with Coletti.

Did you see me nodding my head behind my computer monitor?

Anyway, dj2's post gave his position away anyhow so it hardly matters anymore.

Please point out where and when I did this. It sure matters if I didn't say this.
[/b]

No didn't see you nodding your head, but then I do have a lot of prior information about your views on this subject.

Whichever way you look at it - the evidence from the Bible, the incredible complex, organised information in living things, or the origin of the universe - belief in an all powerful, all-knowing Creator God, as revealed in the Bilble, not only makes sense, but it is the only viable explanation.
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=19960&page=5

‘For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse’ (Romans 1:20).
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=20122&page=3

Yet the evidence of God is there to be seen by everybody. It is just a matter of your pre-suppositions the determine how you interpret the evidence.
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=22225&page=2

Why do you need to try and prove Gods existance is there is no way that you can disprove it? How else do you explain the begining of the universe?
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=22301

Therefore atheism is a logical contradiction, and to affirm to a logical contradiction is irrational. So also is the concept of a world without a Creator, and a human heart that does not yearn for God to fill it.
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=22301

There is no branch that looks at a larger portion of God's handiork than do astronomers. The Scripture says: "The Heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth his handiwork". (Psalm 19:1); "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen" (Romans 1:10). Ninety percent of all astronomers today believe in God! Those who have most thoroughly examined His handiwork believe in God. That is a higher percentage than will be found of butchers, bakers, or candlestick-makers. Those who have looked most intently and to the fartherest extent that man has been able to see in the universe have concluded that the hand that made it is Divine.
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=22392

I look at the universe everyday. Thus I cannot but believe in the existance of God.
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=22301


As for where you gave away your position, I already quoted this in my previous post. You see, if you want to understand, you have to read.

Dj2, I can see that it was a mistake for me to try and enlighten you. I'll go back to being a Muffin now.

Originally posted by telerion
Dj2, I can see that it was a mistake for me to try and enlighten you. I'll go back to being a Muffin now.

I wonder what went wrong... Could it be that you forgot the baking powder?

Originally posted by telerion
Dj2, I can see that it was a mistake for me to try and enlighten you. I'll go back to being a Muffin now.

You put me off because you said that you don't believe in Muffy🙁

I tend to be something that I belive in 😉

Originally posted by dj2becker
You put me off because you said that you don't believe in Muffy🙁

I tend to be something that I belive in 😉

Really? I would have thought it a great testament to my rationality that I, as a Muffin, do not believe in Muffy.

You however cannot say the analogous as you actually believe in God.

Originally posted by telerion
Really? I would have thought it a great testament to my rationality that I, as a Muffin, do not believe in Muffy.

You however cannot say the analogous as you actually believe in God.

Well thats the most beautiful Oxy Moron I've seen 😉

A Muffin that doesn't belive in muffy...

Y'all have convinced me too. Praise to Muffy! She's the girl for me.

Originally posted by dj2becker
Well thats the most beautiful Oxy Moron I've seen 😉

A Muffin that doesn't belive in muffy...

You are mistaken. It's not an oxymoron, it's a paradox. Not believing in Muffy is an essential ingredient in Muffyism. Muffy loves paradoxes.

Originally posted by nickybutt
Y'all have convinced me too. Praise to Muffy! She's the girl for me.

Great, the Scandinavian congregation is growing! 🙂 And thanks to dj2becker for helping to spread the word! 😛

Originally posted by nickybutt
Y'all have convinced me too. Praise to Muffy! She's the girl for me.

Welcome Brother Nicky. I exhort you to go forth and share the good reason of Muffy.

Originally posted by Nordlys
Great, the Scandinavian congregation is growing! 🙂 And thanks to dj2becker for helping to spread the word! 😛

That's an interesting point. What was it that Darfius would always harp about? The Bible was written by authors from three continents but never contradicts itself? Well we can't say the later as contradiction is a key part of the revelations of Muffy, but I think we may have the continents thing beat pretty soon.

Originally posted by Nordlys
You are mistaken. It's not an oxymoron, it's a paradox. Not believing in Muffy is an essential ingredient in Muffyism. Muffy loves paradoxes.

Is that why he created such mournful optimist's (Muffins) with such a deafening silence?

Originally posted by dj2becker
Is that why he created such mournful optimist's (Muffins) with such a deafening silence?

Muffy did not create Muffins. You need to read the revelations of Muffy here at RHP. Unless you've had a revelation from Muffy that Muffy is male, please stop assigning Muffy gender.

Originally posted by telerion
Muffy did not create Muffins. You need to read the revelations of Muffy here at RHP. Unless you've had a revelation from Muffy that Muffy is male, please stop assigning Muffy gender.

Muffy did not create Muffins.

Oh then I suppose you did?

You need to read the revelations of Muffy here at RHP.

Written by Muffins? Muffins don't believe in Muffy, why should I read what they have to say about Muffy?