Originally posted by telerionSee? Muffyism/Godism, mirror images. 🙂
EVERYTHING YOU JUST WROTE IS EVIDENCE OF MUFFY.
Originally posted by dj2becker
Everything you just wrote proves that you don't know God.
Now don't you feel a bit silly? Slow down and think about it for a moment before responding. Show us that you understand.
Originally posted by telerionWould you be so kind as to point out a single post in which I stated that the natural is proof of the supernatural?
See? Muffyism/Godism, mirror images. 🙂
Now don't you feel a bit silly? Slow down and think about it for a moment before responding. Show us that you understand.
Maybe you should read my thread titled "God view".
I would like to highlight a part that I did write:
I also believe that the God of the Bible is in addition dynamic: He often acts differently; now full of love, then again as avenger. For that reason we may not make images of Him. Because he is the creator, God is totally different from man; He is unrecognizable to man. Logical understanding and intellect cannot explain Him: the intellect is a part of creation, and how can creation, explain the Creator?
God does nevertheless not remain the unknown God. He, who is eternal and unchangeable and incomprehensible to man, reveals a part of His being in his creation. For this he uses the prophets, His law, nature and supernatural intervention in nature. He speaks more directly to man in His Word and informs him of His will. The whole creation refers to the Creator, the handiwork of the Maker.
The New Testament represents a special revelation of God: God in human form. In Jesus the unimaginable finds human stature and makes it possible for man to come close to Him, to love and follow Him. In Christ he reveals a special aspect of Himself: His love.
Originally posted by dj2beckerSure, buddy. Just here in your last post.
Would you be so kind as to point out a single post in which I stated that the natural is proof of the supernatural?
"The whole creation refers to the Creator, the handiwork of the Maker."
Oddly enough it sounds like you are becoming a Muffin or maybe your grammar is so bad that you cannot recognize the misplaced modifier in your sentence.
Oh dj, you are so much fun.
Originally posted by lucifershammerNo I have continually cited Coletti. See my deductive proof in the FAQ "Why I am a Muffin."
He's mixing you up with Coletti.
This arose out of "An Analogy of Faith" in which Coletti made the statement that the natural was evidence of the supernatural. Dj2 agreed with Coletti.
Anyway, dj2's post gave his position away anyhow so it hardly matters anymore.
Originally posted by telerionYou might notice that "refer" and "prove" are rather different in meaning.
Sure, buddy. Just here in your last post.
"The whole creation refers to the Creator, the handiwork of the Maker."
Oddly enough it sounds like you are becoming a Muffin or maybe your grammar is so bad that you cannot recognize the misplaced modifier in your sentence.
Oh dj, you are so much fun.
Originally posted by WheelyWelcome Brother Wheel. I exhort you to go forth and speak the good reason of Muffy!
I'm in!
I was feeling a little hungry and went to the refrigerator to see if there was perhaps some pasta or maybe a bit of cheese I could have. Just as I opened the door I was blinded by a bright light and my eyes were opened. My hunger has been sated and I am now a true believer in Muffydom