Originally posted by chaney3 It can also be assumed that the writers of the New Testament had no clue about the necessity of the Y chromosome.
Obviously so.
But it must be noted that the writers of the New Testament did not invent the idea that Jesus was born without a father being involved. That came later.
I am not aware of how religious scholars, or the Bible deal with this 'problem' regarding the immaculate conception. Actually the 'immaculate conception' is the birth of Mary and was invented by the Catholic Church and doesn't involve a Y Chromosome at all.
Originally posted by chaney3 Where did the required Y chromosome come from in the conception of Jesus, which comes from the human father?
Do you have a sample of Jesus' DNA?
Luke 1:35 says "And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God."
Details are lacking, but do you think that it is an impossible thing for the Creator of the Universe? Legend has it that he spoke Creation into existence; do you think it impossible that he could craft a zygote into Mary's womb from one of her eggs?
Originally posted by FMF It's not something that I believe in but I don't go around labelling it "BS".
I've been here over a decade and you won't find me talking in that way. One would need to feel angry, which I don't.
Plenty of people who are much cleverer than me in many ways believe in it.
So, what about you? Do you think that the concept of Jesus' birth being the result of a miracle is "BS" and needs to be referred to in that way?
Why don't you ask divegeester if one has to be "angry" to call out something as "BS"?
Sorry to disillusion you, but no "anger" is necessary. You often accuse people of being "angry" when nothing is further from the truth. It's just another way you put people down and belittle their opinions.