Originally posted by FMFWhat does 'good' and 'evil' mean to you? Do they describe something 'real' or 'imaginary'?
When I claim that your personal moral beliefs, in so far as you have described them, are sheer nonsense, I do so without asserting that there is a "universal moral standard" and don't accept that I have to subscribe to the idea that there is such a thing.
You are unable to differentiate between the degree of "evil" exhibited by someone who is prideful - or a ...[text shortened]... I am glad to hear you find my views incoherent. It would be disturbing if it were not the case.
Originally posted by FMFOk so if we all share they same reality, then that which is genuinely true is true for all of us not just some of us right?
I do. However, this 'sharing the same reality' thing does not mean that I have to concur with all claims you make about that reality, just as you don't have to accept mine.
Originally posted by DeepThoughtSome may argue that torturing someone who holds information that could save a million lives may be morally acceptable. I phrased it the way I did to avoid such red herrings.
The way that you've phrased this question implies to me that you think that there are circumstances when torture is acceptable. Care to state what they are?