25 Sep '18 13:53>
Originally posted by @thinkofoneIt is "incoherent" to you simply because you do not believe it.
[b]Just because you cannot reconcile what you think with what is written?
Because what is written is not coherent.[/b]
Originally posted by @thinkofoneIt is "incoherent" to you simply because you do not believe it.
[b]Just because you cannot reconcile what you think with what is written?
Because what is written is not coherent.[/b]
Originally posted by @sonshipBut it is God's will. "Thy will be done" is the entire focus of the prayer. It matters not "by whom". If anything, it's inferred that it be "by God" and "by us".Could someone with more knowledge/experience explain: who is the "by whom" implied in the line "Your will be done"? In other words, is the prayer really saying, "Your will be done by you [God]"--as in, "May you do to/in the world whatever you see fit"? Or is the prayer really saying, "Your will be done by us"--as in, "May we do to/in the world whate ...[text shortened]... ng for His good pleasure. " (Phil 2:12 RcV)
I thought it was a very good question.
But it is God's will.
"You then pray in this way:
Our Father who is in the heavens, Your name be sanctified,
Your kingdom come, Your will be done, as in heaven, so also on earth." (vs. 9,10)
"Thy will be done" is the entire focus of the prayer. It matters not "by whom". If anything, it's inferred that it be "by God" and "by us".
"For Your's is the kingdom ..."
"For Your's is ... the power..."
"For Your's is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever .."
The prayer doesn't mention "by whom" because it's simply not important, and by focusing on this unimportant detail, the importance of God's will is lessened.
Originally posted by @suzianneC'mon suzianne. Seems you've gone off half-cocked again.
It is "incoherent" to you simply because you do not believe it.
The reason I don't believe it is that it's incoherent - when all is said and done, there's no making logical sense of it. Just because you have faith in it regardless doesn't change this fact.
Originally posted by @sonshipYes, the three-oneness of God is really hard, perhaps and probably, impossible to fully understand.The reason I don't believe it is that it's incoherent - when all is said and done, there's no making logical sense of it. Just because you have faith in it regardless doesn't change this fact.
Yes, the three-oneness of God is really hard, perhaps and probably, impossible to fully understand.
But are you being too hard on God?
Is ...[text shortened]... be at a least something which is incomprehensibly different about this Creator from themselves ?
Originally posted by @thinkofone
Face it. The concept of the "trinity" was necessitated by the insistence of some people's belief that Jesus is literally God. So the doctrine of the "trinity" was invented in an ill-thought-out attempt to reconcile problems that arise from this belief. This despite that fact that the sensible thing to do is dispense with the belief that Jesus is literally God. Problem solved.
"Thomas answered and said to Him [Jesus], My Lord and my God!" (John 20:28)
Originally posted by @handyandyDo you think the question/s posed are that simple?
Note to OP: Obviously, this isn't the place to get a simple, straightforward answer.
who is the "by whom" implied in the line "Your will be done"? In other words, is the prayer really saying, "Your will be done by you [God]"--as in, "May you do to/in the world whatever you see fit"? Or is the prayer really saying, "Your will be done by us"--as in, "May we do to/in the world whatever you see fit"?
who is the "by whom" implied in the line "Your will be done"? In other words, is the prayer really saying, "Your will be done by you [God]"--as in, "May you do to/in the world whatever you see fit"? Or is the prayer really saying, "Your will be done by us"--as in, "May we do to/in the world whatever you see fit"?
Originally posted by @sonshipLooks like you beat my edit:
[quote] Face it. The concept of the "trinity" was necessitated by the insistence of some people's belief that Jesus is literally God. So the doctrine of the "trinity" was invented in an ill-thought-out attempt to reconcile problems that arise from this belief. This despite that fact that the sensible thing to do is dispense with the belief that Jesus is lit ...[text shortened]... ble peace in your heart that you have made finally, the right decision concerning Who Jesus is.
Originally posted by @handyandyIt’s not about obeying laws that is purely legalistic, its more about having a heart right which would get even better results. Obeying laws don’t change people making them better, but a new heart, spirit would.
"Thy will be done" is a prayer that we and others obey the laws specified by God.
Originally posted by @suzianneBelieving in the Trinty does indeed require faith as the concept is an awkward 'add-on' to the Bible that stretches plausibility to its very limits. For every biblical passage that would seem to support the notion, another can be provided to negate it. How is that not an inconsistency?
Just because you cannot reconcile what you think with what is written?
Calling something an "inconsistency" just because you don't believe part of it isn't telling the whole truth.