1. Joined
    12 Jun '08
    Moves
    19450
    29 Jun '09 05:41
    Any predictions?

    Australia 4 - 1
  2. Joined
    13 Sep '05
    Moves
    17200
    29 Jun '09 11:29
    Aussies 2 - 1
  3. Standard memberInlandRevenueUK
    Cause I'm the taxman
    Joined
    03 Jun '07
    Moves
    22461
    29 Jun '09 17:00
    2-2
  4. Joined
    10 Jan '08
    Moves
    10258
    30 Jun '09 03:31
    aus 3-0
  5. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    the Devil himself
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    91890
    05 Jul '09 04:35
    aus 2-1
    hughes 3 centuries
  6. Standard memberElamef37
    Queenslander
    Tropical North
    Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    561184
    06 Jul '09 13:27
    Can't see the Aussies winning, unfortunately.
  7. Standard memberCrowley
    Not Aleister
    Control room
    Joined
    17 Apr '02
    Moves
    91690
    06 Jul '09 20:48
    Originally posted by Elamef37
    Can't see the Aussies winning, unfortunately.
    This is why girls shouldn't be allowed to comment on sports...
  8. Standard memberElamef37
    Queenslander
    Tropical North
    Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    561184
    06 Jul '09 21:12
    Originally posted by Crowley
    This is why girls shouldn't be allowed to comment on sports...
    Yeah whatever dude! Like you're an expert!


    They'll struggle w/o Brett Lee


    And just so you know, I don't have to have clackers to know Cricket.
  9. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    06 Jul '09 21:413 edits
    Originally posted by Elamef37
    Yeah whatever dude! Like you're an expert!


    They'll struggle w/o Brett Lee


    And just so you know, I don't have to have clackers to know Cricket.
    do you want me to play him at chess and kick his a$$, na only kidding, but ummm.... i will if you want! πŸ˜‰ its more than my life is worth if the Aussies don't win, please please please, The Aussies must win!
  10. Joined
    12 Jun '08
    Moves
    19450
    07 Jul '09 07:06
    For all the hype about him, Lee would have been a liability. The conditions will suit Hilfenhaus better. Reasonably quick and swings the ball regularly.
  11. Standard memberCrowley
    Not Aleister
    Control room
    Joined
    17 Apr '02
    Moves
    91690
    07 Jul '09 07:36
    Originally posted by Zort Boy
    For all the hype about him, Lee would have been a liability. The conditions will suit Hilfenhaus better. Reasonably quick and swings the ball regularly.
    I can't believe that, but the Aussies have enough depth to tackle the English.

    They beat us without Lee, so that means they can beat anyone without him, provided Johnson breaks Kevin Pieterson's finger twice.
  12. Joined
    12 Jun '08
    Moves
    19450
    07 Jul '09 07:41
    6 wickets in what was essentially a warm up game did not mean Lee should have played in the first Test. Fitness, lack of match practice and his no ball problems should have counted against him.

    The first two sessions of the first test have the potential to decide the series.
  13. Joined
    13 Sep '05
    Moves
    17200
    07 Jul '09 12:06
    Brett Lee? I'm almost glad that he's not playing! Not only is he not the future of Australian cricket but his best is behind him too.. he doesn't have the pace any more and he can't swing it. Bring in the new guys I say..
  14. Joined
    12 Jun '08
    Moves
    19450
    07 Jul '09 14:26
    I wouldn't have taken Clark on tour either. Bollinger should have gone in his place.
  15. Standard memberElamef37
    Queenslander
    Tropical North
    Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    561184
    08 Jul '09 04:54
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    do you want me to play him at chess and kick his a$$, na only kidding, but ummm.... i will if you want! πŸ˜‰ its more than my life is worth if the Aussies don't win, please please please, The Aussies must win!
    It's okay Robbie, I wouldn't want you wasting your time on himπŸ˜€

    He's too much of a misery guts anywayπŸ˜‰


    I really do want the Aussies to win, but we'll just have to wait and see πŸ™‚
Back to Top