Originally posted by Elamef37 Yeah whatever dude! Like you're an expert!
They'll struggle w/o Brett Lee
And just so you know, I don't have to have clackers to know Cricket.
do you want me to play him at chess and kick his a$$, na only kidding, but ummm.... i will if you want! π its more than my life is worth if the Aussies don't win, please please please, The Aussies must win!
For all the hype about him, Lee would have been a liability. The conditions will suit Hilfenhaus better. Reasonably quick and swings the ball regularly.
Originally posted by Zort Boy For all the hype about him, Lee would have been a liability. The conditions will suit Hilfenhaus better. Reasonably quick and swings the ball regularly.
I can't believe that, but the Aussies have enough depth to tackle the English.
They beat us without Lee, so that means they can beat anyone without him, provided Johnson breaks Kevin Pieterson's finger twice.
6 wickets in what was essentially a warm up game did not mean Lee should have played in the first Test. Fitness, lack of match practice and his no ball problems should have counted against him.
The first two sessions of the first test have the potential to decide the series.
Brett Lee? I'm almost glad that he's not playing! Not only is he not the future of Australian cricket but his best is behind him too.. he doesn't have the pace any more and he can't swing it. Bring in the new guys I say..
Originally posted by robbie carrobie do you want me to play him at chess and kick his a$$, na only kidding, but ummm.... i will if you want! π its more than my life is worth if the Aussies don't win, please please please, The Aussies must win!
It's okay Robbie, I wouldn't want you wasting your time on himπ
He's too much of a misery guts anywayπ
I really do want the Aussies to win, but we'll just have to wait and see π