Go back
Boeing 757, more problems, lost nose wheel

Boeing 757, more problems, lost nose wheel

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
yes, airline safety is his responsibility.

Are you defending his inaction?
I flew on a Max 9 this morning.

Thanks to Pete, the screws all held.

I saw him on the tarmac with a screwdriver.


-Removed-
I just flew a Max 9 and I have 6 more scheduled flights in the next 8 days, all Boeing.

Nice knowing ya.


@sh76 said
I just flew a Max 9 and I have 6 more scheduled flights in the next 8 days, all Boeing.

Nice knowing ya.
stupid is as stupid does…


@sh76 said
I flew on a Max 9 this morning.

Thanks to Pete, the screws all held.

I saw him on the tarmac with a screwdriver.
very glad for you…was petey walking a little sideways?

some times he does ya know after his man gets done with him

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
stupid is as stupid does…
Now in FRA. Got here on a B777 from SFO. Awesome plane and still in one piece.

Looking forward to my next segment in an hour.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kmax87 said
Depends who you listen to, but Boeings troubles started when they took over McDonnell Douglass and then the McDonnell Douglass sales and marketing culture took over Boeing.

Also Boeing CEO David Calhoun is a disciple of Jack Welsh who took GE to great heights before destroying it. Welsh's brand of corporate greed is profit over everything, which is great for shareholders fo ...[text shortened]... tion and great products that make great companies, not hype, cost cutting and financial engineering.
Yeah it might work for McDs but if your bldg tin cans that people fly through the sky at great speed it has to be safety and quality control first and the profits will follow.
It’s another example of uncontrolled capitalism eating itself, I would fly anything with the word Boeing on it for a long time, if ever.


@kevcvs57 said
Yeah it might work for McDs but if your bldg tin cans that people fly through the sky at great speed it has to be safety and quality control first and the profits will follow.
It’s another example of uncontrolled capitalism eating itself, I would fly anything with the word Boeing on it for a long time, if ever.
If you think Airbus is any less controlled by profit motive, you're extremely naive.

That they've done better QC than Boeing over the last few years is a function of the latter's poor management, not a function of economic theory.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
stupid is as stupid does…
momma says life is like a box of screws...

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down


-Removed-
It's a cycle. Boeing is down now, but one would figure they'll eventually right the ship. Boeing and Airbus have traded places as the top dog a number of times and the cycle will likely continue.

As far as QA, even with all of Boeing's problems, flying is extremely safe, much safer than any other mode of transportation. With all the problems, there hasn't been a single commercial aviation death in the US in over 15 years, IIRC.


@sh76 said
If you think Airbus is any less controlled by profit motive, you're extremely naive.

That they've done better QC than Boeing over the last few years is a function of the latter's poor management, not a function of economic theory.
Pressure cabin doors don’t fly off because of poor business sense, nose wheels don’t fly off because of poor business sense. Sorry but that only happens because of a lack of production line quality control and overly tight maintenance budgets.
It’s because they were allowed to regulate themselves and put profit over safety.
If your still flying Boeing you must be some kind of adrenaline junkie
Try to grab an aisle seat and keep your seatbelt on at all times

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kevcvs57
===If your still flying Boeing you must be some kind of adrenaline junkie===

On the off chance that you're being serious, look it up. Flying on a Boeing is safer than any method of non-flying transportation; especially per mile.

If flying on a Boeing is being an adrenaline junkie then walking from place to place is skydiving without a parachute.

1 edit

@sh76 said
@kevcvs57
===If your still flying Boeing you must be some kind of adrenaline junkie===

On the off chance that you're being serious, look it up. Flying on a Boeing is safer than any method of non-flying transportation; especially per mile.

If flying on a Boeing is being an adrenaline junkie then walking from place to place is skydiving without a parachute.
I guess the deteriorating conditions, operative and quality control is lost on you.

You try to back up your assertion based on how things have been previously, before this dei bullshyt.

Its just a matter of time unless policies are changed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sh76 said
@kevcvs57
===If your still flying Boeing you must be some kind of adrenaline junkie===

On the off chance that you're being serious, look it up. Flying on a Boeing is safer than any method of non-flying transportation; especially per mile.

If flying on a Boeing is being an adrenaline junkie then walking from place to place is skydiving without a parachute.
Well you could always keep to the pavement and only cross on a green light just as you could not fly Boeing, both strategies will improve your survival chances and the second one might make Boeing rethink their business strategy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kevcvs57 said
Well you could always keep to the pavement and only cross on a green light just as you could not fly Boeing, both strategies will improve your survival chances and the second one might make Boeing rethink their business strategy.
or get dei out of it…seems things were going pretty good till that got started.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.