@Rajk999 said"I can bet you cannot give one good reason why Charlie Kirk deserved death"
I can bet you cannot give one good reason why Charlie Kirk deserved death. But you have no problem supporting Islam which openly calls for death to Christians and other unbelievers, a call actually praciticed by some Muslim idiots.
Charlie Kirk believed the following ..
- in God
- that homosexuality is a sin according to God
- that Islam was an evil cult, which it is a ...[text shortened]... sting doctrine, and quick to use profanities, obscenities and other insults when speaking to people.
I bet if i explain 5 more times i never said that, you would still lie through your teeth that i did
"Charlie Kirk believed the following ..
- in God"
Keep your imaginary friend to yourself
" that homosexuality is a sin according to God"
I don;'t care what you think your imaginary friend thinks about homosexuality. Two consenting adults loving each other is not a sin and if god was real and he said it is, then that god is evil.
" that abortion is a sin which it is"
it is evil to force a little girl to deliver her rapist child
it is evil to let a woman die because the procedure to save her is considered abortion by evil idiots who aren't doctors
it is evil to deprive a woman of freedom to force her to do something with her body that she doesn't want.
"that Islam was an evil cult, which it is as it destroys people's lives"
christianity destroys plenty of people's lives. but you don't look at those cases and you believe the equally few cases of extremist islam characterizes all 2 billion of them.
which makes you an evil bigoted pile of crap
"- that encouraging young children to change their sex is foolish."
i would take a psychologist's opinion over you or the late scumbag Kirk's any day of the week.
It is quite possible Kirk didn't even believe half of the crap he was spewing. He got rich saying it and he didn't have the conscience to care just who he was hurting to get that money
"None of those beliefs caused the death of anyone"
That you know of. And you know little
" you are quick to call for the death to people who oppose your sick disgusting doctrine"
i never called for the death of charlie kirk, you lying piece of manure
"and quick to use profanities, obscenities and other insults when speaking to people"
Only very special , vile people, who richly deserve it.
@Rajk999 saidi was making a point that there is vile crap in the bible as well, you dumb bastard, but it went over your head.
The story of Lot and his daughters has nothing to do with killing unbelievers. Also Abraham killing some youths is in no way an instruction to kill unbelievers.
Jews have not been killing unbelievers, youths etc throughout the ages.
The Muslims have been doing it, and following the Quran's isntruction to rape women, kill the men, convert the nations to Islam.
there are christians who interpret the bible one way and there are those who interpret it another way. I don't judge christianity by the KKK or westboro baptist church or the american talibans. If you weren't
"Jews have not been killing unbelievers, youths etc throughout the ages."
Bwahahahaha, have you read the bible? The same bible that is invoked by public figures in Israeli government to justify killing unbelievers, youths, TODAY?
Damn you're dumb 😆
"The Muslims have been doing it, and following the Quran's isntruction to rape women, kill the men, convert the nations to Islam."
SOME muslims. FEW muslims, you dumb bigoted POS
@Zahlanzi saidYou are losing it. You already responded to that post, and this second response is too full of rubbish to reply.
"I can bet you cannot give one good reason why Charlie Kirk deserved death"
I bet if i explain 5 more times i never said that, you would still lie through your teeth that i did
"Charlie Kirk believed the following ..
- in God"
Keep your imaginary friend to yourself
" that homosexuality is a sin according to God"
I don;'t care what you think your imaginary friend th ...[text shortened]... and other insults when speaking to people"
Only very special , vile people, who richly deserve it.
There are no Christians killing unbelievers in any part of the world. Right now these sick Muslims are beheading Christians in Nigeria and DRC. Nobody cares about the 2 billion so-called moderates and the fact that you keep repeating that rubbish means you have no defence for the dozens of atrocities committed by Islamic extremists all over the world.
@sh76 saidThey were NOT selectively censoring conservative viewpoints. That was known from before musk bought Twitter, and was proven definitely after he had access to the entire dataset.
I never said it was a free speech issue. The First Amendment (generally speaking) doesn't dictate the conduct of private social media outlets. I get it. That wasn't the point I want making. My point was that social media sites WERE censoring conservative viewpoints, not that they weren't allowed to.
What you describe are anecdotes, not censorship for the sake of silencing conservative viewpoints in general. If anything, conservatives were amplified overall.
@Zahlanzi saidYou are such a C..T . Some Muslims are committing atrocities. Who cares about the ones who are not doing it ... fool. Should the world ignore the atrocities of Islam because some are not doing it ... you donkey.
"The Muslims have been doing it, and following the Quran's isntruction to rape women, kill the men, convert the nations to Islam."
SOME muslims. FEW muslims, you dumb bigoted POS
@Rajk999 said" Who cares about the ones who are not doing it"
You are such a C..T . Some Muslims are committing atrocities. Who cares about the ones who are not doing it ... fool. Should the world ignore the atrocities of Islam because some are not doing it ... you donkey.
Decent people
"Should the world ignore the atrocities of Islam because some are not doing it "
No, just not lump all 2 billions together with the few thousands who are terrorists
Just like i don't judge all christians by how much of a sociopath you are
@Zahlanzi saidYeah and some of those decent people are learning the hard way about Islam. So they are not decent. They are stupid. They are being killed, raped, stoned to death, beheaded, made to wear ridiculous clothes, women and beaten and abused ... you are a damn fool.
" Who cares about the ones who are not doing it"
Decent people
"Should the world ignore the atrocities of Islam because some are not doing it "
No, just not lump all 2 billions together with the few thousands who are terrorists
Just like i don't judge all christians by how much of a sociopath you are
1 edit
@sh76 saidHow about this "respectful" comment:
Look, WG, I know you're not going to go back and watch 100 hours of his content just because I ask you to, but I have watched 100 hours of his content or more, and none of those things sound like him.
"Black women don't have the brain processing power" really sounds like something so antithetical to his respectful attitude to all. None of those quote sounds like him to me.
""If I see a Black pilot, I'm going to be like, 'Boy, I hope he's qualified.'" https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/columnist/mike-freeman/2024/02/04/charlie-kirk-black-pilot-comment-tuskegee-airmen/72412319007/
@no1marauder saidYou see everything as racist. You cannot have an adult conversation. You only see things through your biased lense.
How about this "respectful" comment:
""If I see a Black pilot, I'm going to be like, 'Boy, I hope he's qualified.'" https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/columnist/mike-freeman/2024/02/04/charlie-kirk-black-pilot-comment-tuskegee-airmen/72412319007/
This comment was made while discussing DEI placements.
While blacks make up less than 4% of commercial airline pilots, I think he has a valid point since people are being given jobs BECAUSE OF THEIR SKIN COLOR, not their ability to do the job.
There was nothing racist about it, just factual.
@sh76 saidI'm honestly trying to figure why you and the right revered him so, but your clarification makes the clip seem even worse. You portray him as a consensus builder and yet he tears down extremely successful and influential people based on gender and skin color.
He wasn't a speechmaker. That's the point. He was an engager. His thing was dialogue, not speeches.
In the clip, he's attaching Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson, not "black women." If I attack George Soros, that doesn't make me an anti-Semite. If I attack Joe Biden, it doesn't make me a hater of old senile white men.
You say something about Soros, fine, but you say he is the way he is because he's Jewish... Ehhh. And then you are aghast when some folks call Kirk a racist?
I am still waiting for one good example where his "dialogue" demonstrated a sophisticated worldview to be admired and dubbed heroic. It seems like he only "engaged" with liberals in order to tell them he thought they were wrong. In which case he was just a troll.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThat's because you're a racist.
You see everything as racist. You cannot have an adult conversation. You only see things through your biased lense.
This comment was made while discussing DEI placements.
While blacks make up less than 4% of commercial airline pilots, I think he has a valid point since people are being given jobs BECAUSE OF THEIR SKIN COLOR, not their ability to do the job.
There was nothing racist about it, just factual.
Black pilots receive the exact same training and have to fulfill the same requirements of those of any other "race".
That Kirk was either ignorant of this or chose to ignore it makes me think he isn't that great of a role model for sh76's 16 year old son.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidEveryone who applies for a job as a pilot is qualified. They don't let you apply unless you have specific training.
You see everything as racist. You cannot have an adult conversation. You only see things through your biased lense.
This comment was made while discussing DEI placements.
While blacks make up less than 4% of commercial airline pilots, I think he has a valid point since people are being given jobs BECAUSE OF THEIR SKIN COLOR, not their ability to do the job.
There was nothing racist about it, just factual.
@no1marauder saidDEI changed that, no training necessary.
That's because you're a racist.
Black pilots receive the exact same training and have to fulfill the same requirements of those of any other "race".
That Kirk was either ignorant of this or chose to ignore it makes me think he isn't that great of a role model for sh76's 16 year old son.
Less than 4% of pilots are black…same training as you say…why is that?
Would you not be suspicious since DEI was forced on everyone? I know you will just lie about it tho. What’s the use.
You leftwing nutcases can’t deal with reality.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThe reality is what I told you ----- black pilots receive the same training and have to fulfill the same requirements as those of any other race before they fly passenger planes.
DEI changed that, no training necessary.
Less than 4% of pilots are black…same train as you say…why is that?
Would you not be suspicious since DEI was forced on everyone? I know you will just lie about it tho. What’s the use.
You leftwing nutcases can’t deal with reality.
I expect someone as uneducated as you to be unaware of this but Kirk should not have been (if he was).
@no1marauder saidIf there were any evidence - literally anything - that could be considered to justify Charlie Kirks statement about the safety of flying in a plane with a black pilot, I would be all ears. That's a real debate.
The reality is what I told you ----- black pilots receive the same training and have to fulfill the same requirements as those of any other race before they fly passenger planes.
I expect someone as uneducated as you to be unaware of this but Kirk should not have been (if he was).