@eladar saidhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/getting-a-photo-id-so-you-can-vote-is-easy-unless-youre-poor-black-latino-or-elderly/2016/05/23/8d5474ec-20f0-11e6-8690-f14ca9de2972_story.html
Getting ID in the US is very easy.
Getting a photo ID so you can vote is easy. Unless you’re poor, black, Latino or elderly.
And here's one from Fox News:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/voter-id-laws-could-disproportionately-hurt-young-minorities
Voter ID Laws Could Disproportionately Hurt Young Minorities
- Joined
- 14 Feb 09
- Moves
- 12541
1 edit
@eladar saidThey are lazy and dumb.
Getting ID in the US is very easy. There is no reason why any US citizen who wants to get an ID cannot get an id. It may take some time sitting in a DMV or social security office, but an ID is very easy to get.
I have all of my I.D. after losing it three times due to me being a criminal.
I have all of mine now... again.
Democrats know non whites tend to be lazy with important stuff so they hate the idea of people having to get voter I.D.
- Joined
- 28 Feb 16
- Moves
- 5090
@very-musty saidSorry for the delay. I got this little thing called "a job."
You going to answer vivify?
What was the question?
Oh, guns. I know a LOT of conservatives that support only selling guns to legal citizens. That's not the problem. The problem is that absolutely ZERO gun laws are obeyed by criminals. Criminals disobey laws. It's sort of their "thing." Criminals obtain weapons through any means possible.
If the USA wants to see violent gun crime decrease, try this one out: Any time a gun is used in a crime and the criminal is apprehended, pass a law that goes like this. If he only used the gun to intimidate his victim into giving away possessions, he automatically gets 15 years hard time, period, no chance for parole. If he actually fired the firearm, even if he missed who he was shooting at, make it 25 years, no parole. If anyone was harmed by the firearm, death sentence. Executed within as quick a time frame as possible.
Also, if a convicted criminal is found to be in possession of a firearm, 10 years, no parole. If he is found with a firearm and illegal drugs, 20 years, no parole.
Toughen the penalties for ILLEGAL USE OF FIREARMS. Don't make it harder for law abiding citizens to actually obtain self protection.
Adios.
- Joined
- 14 Feb 09
- Moves
- 12541
1 edit
@liljo saidCan't argue with that 🤔
Sorry for the delay. I got this little thing called "a job."
What was the question?
Oh, guns. I know a LOT of conservatives that support only selling guns to legal citizens. That's not the problem. The problem is that absolutely ZERO gun laws are obeyed by criminals. Criminals disobey laws. It's sort of their "thing." Criminals obtain weapons through any means possible.
...[text shortened]... REARMS. Don't make it harder for law abiding citizens to actually obtain self protection.
Adios.
But..but.. that's racist because non whites do those crimes more!!
@vivify saidWho are the racists being hired at the DMV and Social Security office?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/getting-a-photo-id-so-you-can-vote-is-easy-unless-youre-poor-black-latino-or-elderly/2016/05/23/8d5474ec-20f0-11e6-8690-f14ca9de2972_story.html
Getting a photo ID so you can vote is easy. Unless you’re poor, black, Latino or elderly.
And here's one from Fox News:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/voter-id-laws-coul ...[text shortened]... onately-hurt-young-minorities
Voter ID Laws Could Disproportionately Hurt Young Minorities
If you can sign up for welfare, you can get an ID.
Are you going to try to argue that blacks, elderly and latinos are unable to get welfare benefits?
@eladar saidYou saw links from Fox News and the Washington Post. Are you saying they're both wrong?
Who are the racists being hired at the DMV and Social Security office?
If you can sign up for welfare, you can get an ID.
Are you going to try to argue that blacks, elderly and latinos are unable to get welfare benefits?
@vivify saidEither they are hiring racists at the DMV and Social Security Office or your links are total trash.
You saw links from Fox News and the Washington Post. Are you saying they're both wrong?
Of course the people in question just might be too lazy to get their ID, but if that is the case the problem with with the lazy people.
Any of the above is possible.
@sonhouse saidThere are a lot of people that believe the 1960 election was completely stolen from Nixon by the Democrats, and that it was largely done through fabricating the votes of the dead and black voters in Illinois and Texas.
With the HUNDREDS of voter suppression laws going on all around the country and it is clear the voting rights bills in congress are a non starter so repubs win. End of the US as a democracy.
Choke on your pyrrhic victory all you repub traitors to democracy.
A brief blip on this:
The Democrats probably stole Richard Nixon’s 1960 presidential election by “finding” just enough votes in Richard Daley’s Chicago and in Lyndon Johnson’s Texas, fabricating them as fast as they could all night long until they had just enough to “elect” John Kennedy. Although that Kennedy brother was the last Democrat in the White House who ultimately stood up effectively to communists and other American foes and followed capitalist principles encouraging a robust economy, he did not deserve to be elected — because he lost. The Democrats cheated in Boss Richard Daley’s Chicago and in Landslide Lyndon’s Texas, and they stole it from Nixon. (Interesting how “karma” plays out: In the end, (i) Kennedy never serves a full term, (ii) Johnson goes down in ignominy, driven out by early primaries within his own party, (iii) Johnson’s tenure marks the beginning of the end of Democrat dominance in Texas, (iv) Nixon ultimately becomes president anyway, and (v) Nixon gets elected because Richard Daley’s autocracy in Chicago results in mass chaos at the 1968 Democrat convention.) [1]
Sadly, there is not that much on the internet that really would delve into the nuts and bolts of it , but that article is interesting, and there have even been Democrats who have acknowledged this [2].
[1]https://spectator.org/democrats-voter-fraud/
[2] https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2016/10/17/speaking-fraud-andrea-mitchell-admits-1960-election-obviously
- Joined
- 28 Feb 16
- Moves
- 5090
@very-musty saidYa got me there, Musty One!
Can't argue with that 🤔
But..but.. that's racist because non whites do those crimes more!!
😉
@liljo saidThe voter suppression laws being created in places like GA and TX specifically make those things harder to do.
Wait....I specifically recall back in 2016 when the Dems first said, thinking Hitlery would win in a landslide, that Trump's claims the election could be defrauded were a disgrace. Later, when Trump won, the same Dems claimed the Russians juiced the election! They even created a fake document to incriminate Trump with Russian collusion, and spent the entirety of his time in off ...[text shortened]... s. Blame the communists. The DNC, baby. They got the power and America is Done. You should be happy!
4 edits
@eladar saidOr, you're just wrong and ID's are indeed harder to get for minorities due to factors like systemic racism.
Either they are hiring racists at the DMV and Social Security Office or your links are total trash.
Of course the people in question just might be too lazy to get their ID, but if that is the case the problem with with the lazy people.
Any of the above is possible.
Who should I believe: an elderly racist like you or a position supported by both conservative and non-conservative news sources?
