@Earl-of-Trumps saidi didn't get those lightweights, either. kingmoses simply stated they need ID to get jobs. i'd said that in the OP. Have they de-volved into just repeating the headline?
Really!?
So how did I get "shot down" - as you put it?
Does it make sense to you that you need all that identification to work a part-time job, but no ID's needed to vote?
I was shut down, where...? how...? by some stupid democrat plug ugly? I think *not*
@no1marauder saidno, it is not. i've already stated the basis.
Because you ignored that the ID requirement for the shoveling jobs is mandated by Federal law and has nothing to do with Mamdani (Breitbart must not have mentioned that).
1 edit
@no1marauder saidNo, earl is pointing out. like sue has, that the majority want it. That, their reps need t vote their wishes. It is American exceptioinalism at work. Democratic republic. The mystery is that Marauder nor any of of his friends will NOT tell us, who are in the right of course, why the reps will not vote the wishes of their constituents.
Whatever happened to "American Exceptionalism"?
What you are trying to do is limit the number of citizen voters esp. those in groups that tend to vote Democratic.
You just won't admit it.
No1Marauder, I am calling you out on a new question. The citizens of the 50 states have made it clerar that they want photo ID and citizenship ID. WHY will their senators not vote their wishes.
Answer like a man or answer like a flake, and will not read any of your iinsidious links. YOu will not answer.
@AverageJoe1 saidI never said that.
No, earl is pointing out. like sue has, that the majority want it. That, their reps need t vote their wishes. It is American exceptioinalism at work. Democratic republic. The mystery is that Marauder nor any of of his friends will NOT tell us, who are in the right of course, why the reps will not vote the wishes of their constituents.
No1Marauder, I am calling y ...[text shortened]... a man or answer like a flake, and will not read any of your iinsidious links. YOu will not answer.
STOP misrepresenting me.
A full half of the country has lost their minds.
That happened in 2015.
@AverageJoe1 saidLike you guys have de-evolved into just repeating Trump?
i didn't get those lightweights, either. kingmoses simply stated they need ID to get jobs. i'd said that in the OP. Have they de-volved into just repeating the headline?
Homo Non-Sapiens
@AverageJoe1 saidWell if we're switching to a government by opinion poll, I must insist that Congress immediately enact a national health care system, codify abortion rights nationwide and levy much higher taxes on the wealthy, all of which have supported in national polls by large majorities for years.
No, earl is pointing out. like sue has, that the majority want it. That, their reps need t vote their wishes. It is American exceptioinalism at work. Democratic republic. The mystery is that Marauder nor any of of his friends will NOT tell us, who are in the right of course, why the reps will not vote the wishes of their constituents.
No1Marauder, I am calling y ...[text shortened]... a man or answer like a flake, and will not read any of your iinsidious links. YOu will not answer.
There hasn't been any poll showing such support for the SAVE Act which does far more than impose a photo ID requirement for voting.
@no1marauder saidThe evidence is all these democrat states refusing to produce voter rolls
"Unrelated"? You just said:
EOT: What you won't admit is that without voter id, some major league cheating will occur.
Asking for some evidence of "major league cheating" seems quite "related".
@Suzianne saidSue most assuredly said many times on the forum in various threads that the majority of the population should have a say and control things that are done by the government. The majority. Sometimes it was said in her rants about trying to get get rid of the Electoral College…” let we all rule by majority!!!😡” Remember? Do you now remember Sue. I swear that you said it. Do you swear you did not?
I never said that.
STOP misrepresenting me.
A full half of the country has lost their minds.
That happened in 2015.
Geez. Libs…..
@no1marauder saidGood topic.
Well if we're switching to a government by opinion poll, I must insist that Congress immediately enact a national health care system, codify abortion rights nationwide and levy much higher taxes on the wealthy, all of which have supported in national polls by large majorities for years.
There hasn't been any poll showing such support for the SAVE Act which does far more than impose a photo ID requirement for voting.
Please expand with new thread….you imply the population, 51% I assume, want socialism.
Please.
Bring it.
@no1marauder saidThere HAVE been polls on voter requirements, we’ve been writing about that for days.
Well if we're switching to a government by opinion poll, I must insist that Congress immediately enact a national health care system, codify abortion rights nationwide and levy much higher taxes on the wealthy, all of which have supported in national polls by large majorities for years.
There hasn't been any poll showing such support for the SAVE Act which does far more than impose a photo ID requirement for voting.
If may practice some sarcasm, prevalent here but rare for me, “Funny, I thought that voter IDn is the issue, I have looked and looked, but pshaw, I don’t think I see anything about a Save Act discussion. Golly, have I missed it?’”
How’d I do? (They are two different topics)
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, you and the others have equated general support for some type of photo ID requirement to vote with specific support for the SAVE Act such that Democratic Senators should vote for the latter.
There HAVE been polls on voter requirements, we’ve been writing about that for days.
If may practice some sarcasm, prevalent here but rare for me, “Funny, I thought that voter IDn is the issue, I have looked and looked, but pshaw, I don’t think I see anything about a Save Act discussion. Golly, have I missed it?’”
How’d I do? (They are two different topics)
This is disingenuous to the point of dishonesty.
@no1marauder saidLittle fella, we are not writing about the Save act. We are writing about 300 million people that are trying to resolve an issue of whether voting on their government should require a photo ID. We are trying to decide that as a discussion on the forum ,,..,we are not in Washington discussing the Save Act with Hakeem or JD. We are discussing with Suzianne and such as that, …..,citizens sitting around a coffee table. I doubt that anyone including you have read the entire Save act, so we can hardly discuss it now, can we. So one of the issues in that act is about photo ID,…we happen to be talking about photo ID. Can you not see that distinction….. your posting gives me dizziness, but I can handle it. .
No, you and the others have equated general support for some type of photo ID requirement to vote with specific support for the SAVE Act such that Democratic Senators should vote for the latter.
This is disingenuous to the point of dishonesty.
