Go back
Hiroshima / Nagasaki victim list

Hiroshima / Nagasaki victim list

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

it's in threads like this that i miss the restrained and careful insight of No1

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SMSBear716
laughs, I probably would, as a matter of fact. I would be a matyr who helped save the lives of millions from the pain, suffering and death caused by disease. I'd be immortal, well figuratively.

Should I scribble your name down too?

I'm enjoying how people are avoiding my question, btw
I would not. MY reasoning? The world is overpopulated I feel, and about the only thing I can kill is stinging and biting insects... as well as ants that might get too close to my home or office.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by murrow
it's in threads like this that i miss the restrained and careful insight of No1
He posted not long ago (hour?) in Sports forum.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by murrow
it's in threads like this that i miss the retarded and careless insight of No1
I agree. He was fun.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HumeA
Surely the question is not whether Dresden was more 'evil' than Nagasaki or Hiroshima, or even whether different people were more innocent.

The point is that both were terrible, criminal acts targeting civilians. How can you not see that?

Someone in this thread even compared Pearl Harbour to Nagasaki and Hiroshima as like for like... that is ridiculous. ...[text shortened]... the lack of compassion shown by some in this thread has truly disheartened me. Good night.
It is always difficult to impose present day mores on historical events and historical figures.

WWII was full of atrocities:

Rape of Nanking
Aushwitz
Dachau
Buchenwald
Lidice
Kos
Stavelot
Pearl Harbor
Malmedy
Katyn forest
Bangka Island
Palawan
Bataan Death March
Singapore
Hiroshima
Dresden
Nagasaki
Sandakan Death March

And so many more that they can't be listed here.

All of these events were horrific. All were wrong.

It seems clear to me that the the acts of atrocity committed by the British and Americans were far less in quantity than the acts of atrocity committed by the other major warring powers.

To single out Hiroshima or Dresden is, in my mind, to substantially over look pre-meditated massacres the likes of which the world will hopefully never see again.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
It is always difficult to impose present day mores on historical events and historical figures.

WWII was full of atrocities:

Rape of Nanking
Aushwitz
Dachau
Buchenwald
Lidice
Kos
Stavelot
Pearl Harbor
Malmedy
Katyn forest
Bangka Island
Palawan
Bataan Death March
Singapore
Hiroshima
Dresden
Nagasaki
Sandakan Death March

And so many ...[text shortened]... over look pre-meditated massacres the likes of which the world will hopefully never see again.
An interesting video about the perception of violence.

http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/163

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SMSBear716
I'm enjoying how people are avoiding my question, btw
sometimes there's little point answering a point which is so far fetched there's no chance of it ever happening.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SMSBear716
I think you need to check your facts, Dresden had been bombed repeatedly in the days before. The American and Brits were after the railyards and the factories in Dresden and they also hoped the bombing would stir up chaos as well.

Your right about the population being swollen with refugees at the time. Its estimated Dresden had a normal population aro ...[text shortened]... y was the number of dead, Joesph Gobbels inflated the number to 200,000 for propaganda purposes.
From an RAF memo of the time, note the use of the word UNBOMBED.

“Dresden, the seventh largest city in Germany and not much smaller than Manchester, is also far the largest unbombed built-up the enemy has got. In the midst of winter with refugees pouring westwards and troops to be rested, roofs are at a premium. The intentions of the attack are to hit the enemy where he will feel it most, behind an already partially collapsed front, to prevent the use of the city in the way of further advance, and incidentally to show the Russians when they arrive what Bomber Command can do.”

http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/bombing_of_dresden.htm

RAF January 1945

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
It is always difficult to impose present day mores on historical events and historical figures.

WWII was full of atrocities:

Rape of Nanking
Aushwitz
Dachau
Buchenwald
Lidice
Kos
Stavelot
Pearl Harbor
Malmedy
Katyn forest
Bangka Island
Palawan
Bataan Death March
Singapore
Hiroshima
Dresden
Nagasaki
Sandakan Death March

And so many ...[text shortened]... over look pre-meditated massacres the likes of which the world will hopefully never see again.
History is written and reported by the winners. There's probably alot been swept under the carpet. Look at all the recent stuff about the incarceration of suspected terrorists.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rhb
History is written and reported by the winners. There's probably alot been swept under the carpet. Look at all the recent stuff about the incarceration of suspected terrorists.
No question that the US run interrment camps are a black eye, but compare those to Aushwitz.

There is a legal maxim that says that those who seek equity should do so with clean hands.

There is no question in my mind which countries had the dirtiest hands in WWII.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rhb
sometimes there's little point answering a point which is so far fetched there's no chance of it ever happening.
What if I put it in the formart that a Highly advanced race from another galaxy came and made the offer. They would give us something that would cure all diseases forever. They demonstrated and proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that it worked.

Now, we had to give them 20,000 children in exchange. They wouldn't tell us what would happen to them, but assured us we'd never see them again, ever .

Yes, its a hypothetical question but the question is what would you do?
If you would say no, explain why not.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
There is no question in my mind which countries had the dirtiest hands in WWII.
You are entitled to your opinion.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SMSBear716
What if I put it in the formart that a Highly advanced race from another galaxy came and made the offer. They would give us something that would cure all diseases forever. They demonstrated and proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that it worked.

Now, we had to give them 20,000 children in exchange. They wouldn't tell us what would happen to them, but a ...[text shortened]... hetical question but the question is what would you do?
If you would say no, explain why not.
No, because there's more chance of the Pied Piper of Hamlin turning up and taking the kids first.

FFS.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
It is always difficult to impose present day mores on historical events and historical figures.

WWII was full of atrocities:

Rape of Nanking
Aushwitz
Dachau
Buchenwald
Lidice
Kos
Stavelot
Pearl Harbor
Malmedy
Katyn forest
Bangka Island
Palawan
Bataan Death March
Singapore
Hiroshima
Dresden
Nagasaki
Sandakan Death March

And so many ...[text shortened]... over look pre-meditated massacres the likes of which the world will hopefully never see again.
All Horrific Indeed. Yet no one has mentioned the firebombing in Tokyo and other cities of Japan during the war. On March 9th 1945:

This was the worst disaster for Tokyo since the 1923 earthquake. The death toll was at least 80,000, and perhaps exceeded 100,000.[4] This may have been the most devastating single raid ever carried out by aircraft in any war including the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, and the firebombing of Dresden.

from Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Tokyo_in_World_War_II

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I would not. MY reasoning? The world is overpopulated I feel, and about the only thing I can kill is stinging and biting insects... as well as ants that might get too close to my home or office.

P-
Thats fine, at least you answered. Thats all I was curious about.