Go back
Racism and Bigotry should not be tolerated on R...

Racism and Bigotry should not be tolerated on R...

General

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mephisto2
I have (jokingly), but in my environment, not yours.
I actually hurt a guy's feelings I was with using the word when we were all hanging out making up raps. I rhymed with trigger, and the fun ended. I guess we were good enough friends for me not to get socked in the mouth, but he didn't like it at all.

Also, I had a friend get in my car one time and say... "What's up, gars?"

I said, "What?"

He said, "Garfield the cat, like you guys are all cool cats."

I didn't think anything about it, but once we dropped my black friend off he explained how he meant gars as in N-gars... and didn't realize my buddy was in the car when he said it.

It's a bad habit to use the word where I am.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I actually hurt a guy's feelings I was with using the word when we were all hanging out making up raps. I rhymed with trigger, and the fun ended. I guess we were good enough friends for me not to get socked in the mouth, but he didn't like it at all.
Did you rhyme it with trigger or triggah? There's a difference you know.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
I actually think the original point was that football crowds in Europe exhibited more racism than the crowds at US sporting events.

Well that was a later point, the original point was that racism and bigotry on the forums was wrong.
Racism is wrong, period, also in a chess forum, and that is not worth a reaction. But suggesting that a country is more advanced in dealing with these matters than others by referrring to how strongly the use of a word is reacted to, is what I was reacting on. My reaction will be gladly withdrawn if the reason is too.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RookRAK
You've got the wrong guy.

I was not trying to defend any conclusion about maturity or racism. I have opinions but have not had time to actually join the debate.

My only point was to agree with Red Night, that in the current American culture of ultra-political-correctness, nobody is a public setting would dare use the N-word. When I was growing up in t ...[text shortened]... aside from TV comedians.

You will have to draw your own conclusions about what that means.
Point taken (I did ask you, or anybody else, didn't I).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by darvlay
Did you rhyme it with trigger or triggah? There's a difference you know.
Trigga... Where I'm from we couldn't even pronounce the word 'trigger'. You know that.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rbmorris
So you're saying they're violent and they carry weapons? If that's not a stereotype, I don't know what is.
It's a line from a Who Song!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mephisto2
Racism is wrong, period, also in a chess forum, and that is not worth a reaction.
Well, we've got 30 some pages of "reaction" to that statement.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
Well, we've got 30 some pages of "reaction" to that statement.
No, not to "that" statement. Don't be misleading.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mephisto2
No, not to "that" statement. Don't be misleading.
Yes, to that statement. The statement about racism at football matches was fairly recent. The first 25 pages of this thread deal with the primary question of racism on the forum.

Go ahead and read it if you don't believe me.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
Well, we've got 30 some pages of "reaction" to that statement.
Yes, you caused an awful lot controversy of something that isn't really a problem at RHP as long as users use the alert system.

Well done, troll.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mephisto2
No, not to "that" statement. Don't be misleading.
Back on page 25, I made the following statement:

However; if what I'm seeing on the forums and in the news is any indication, perhaps other countries are now beginning to go through some of the issues that the US wrestled with 20 and thirty years ago.

The use of the N word on this thread and the insistence on the right to do so came predominantly not from US residents but from other parts of the world.

I go to lots of sporting events here in the US. It is very rare for some one to shout a racial slur. Apparently this is a common, recurring problem for Thierry Henry. Sort of like it was for Jackie Robinson in the late 40's and early 50's and even Henry Aaron in the early 70's.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
Yes, to that statement. The statement about racism at football matches was fairly recent. The first 25 pages of this thread deal with the primary question of racism on the forum.

Go ahead and read it if you don't believe me.
You already went down from 30 to 25, why?. I reacted to one of your statements AFTER page 25. Or, are these statements 'untouchable' (forgive me the reference to my own example)? I have no need to (re)read the rest.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rbmorris
Dude, that's just wrong. 😞
I hope I am quite frankly.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cashthetrash
I can't help but wonder if the IQ you are always trying to pretend you are excelling in is all in your head. You will never be as good as Hendrix.
What is it with you and Hendrix? Get over it, you're starting to sound like a nutter.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RookRAK
My only point was to agree with Red Night, that in the current American culture of ultra-political-correctness, nobody is a public setting would dare use the N-word. When I was growing up in the sixites yes, but never today. I don't believe I have *ever* heard the world publicly spoken in 20 years aside from TV comedians.
Actually he said "American's, outside of the Klan, almost never say the N word", without limiting it to public settings. Judging from the responses in this thread, that doesn't seem to be true.

That ultra-political-correctness is an interesting phenomenon. In connection with one of my bans, I had a discussion with a mod where I learned that a person who'd discuss the etymology of the f-word in a cafe in the US, speaking loud enough to be heard by other guests, would almost certainly get thrown out, while people don't have any problems with using the word among friends if nobody can overhear them. That's a very strange concept for me. I wouldn't use swear words to swear at someone, no matter whether it's in public or in private, while I wouldn't have any problems using the same words in a non-offensive way, e.g. discussing language, no matter whether it's in public or not (and I can't imagine getting thrown out of a cafe here for doing that). That's indeed an interesting cultural difference, and it may explain some of the problems in international forums like this one.