Go back
The Game Mods

The Game Mods

General

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I know what book moves are from my personal database, as well as chess lab. Who said I didn't?

P-
What is "your personal data base"?

Why did Russ lied to me? You didn't answer to that question.

What's the purpose to have a 1400 player on the game mods?
Can you judge a game between a 1900-2000 player?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
First, we'll have to spend several weeks pleading with Russ to allow a vote. I'd say given Dave Tebb's opposition to the idea, we won't get one. But say we do get one: the prior votes were held open 4-6 weeks; so now we're more than two months with nothing being done. I have no doubt that a majority who vote will vote for public naming of che ...[text shortened]... etc. etc. etc. Either fix the damn thing or don't; I'm starting to not really care either way.
Okay, thanks for explaining. I wasn't around when the first vote and discussion took place (I had barely started playing chess at that time), so there are probably a lot of things I am unaware of. I didn't know, for example, that it might be difficult just to get Russ to allow a vote, or that the voting could take so long. I still wouldn't write it off at once, though. The fact that it was like that last time doesn't necessarily mean it has to be like that again. "You may say I'm a dreamer..." 😉 It's possible that I am too optimistic because I haven't been here so long, but an overly positive approach usually works better than an overly negative approach.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ravello
What is "your personal data base"?

Why did Russ lied to me? You didn't answer to that question.

What's the purpose to have a 1400 player on the game mods?
Can you judge a game between a 1900-2000 player?
Last I checked I was rated 1500... not that that matters at all... since it is my chess engine that does the work, and I pass the findings onto Dave and Russ.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
Last I checked I was rated 1500... not that that matters at all... since it is my chess engine that does the work, and I pass the findings onto Dave and Russ.

P-
LOOK - he admitted it, he admitted IT!, he also uses an engine!! The worms are a turning
get in line to smack his pert botty
🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SirUlrich
LOOK - he admitted it, he admitted IT!, he also uses an engine!! The worms are a turning
get in line to smack his pert botty
🙂
Somehow, I have difficulty telling when you are serious and when not....

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
Last I checked I was rated 1500... not that that matters at all... since it is my chess engine that does the work, and I pass the findings onto Dave and Russ.

P-
Well , hell then . Ought to go out and get me one those engines . Better yet , why don't you just pass those bad boys out like cheese n fuckin' crackers with a deee-lux membership package ? You'd be the most popular site on the whole damned internet . Think of all that bling ! And you sure as hell get rid of all of us whiney babies who aren't with the times .

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
Last I checked I was rated 1500... not that that matters at all... since it is my chess engine that does the work, and I pass the findings onto Dave and Russ.

P-
Why don't you give a straight answer to the questions I did?

What's your "personal database" and why did Russ lied to me?

By the way if having an engine was the only thing requested to do the game mod,I guess everyone who owns one could do it.

As you tell it,seems that all the work is on Tebb's shoulders and your presence as a game mod is totally useless.


Answer to the questions,I'll check the replies when I'll be back from races.





Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by angie88
Somehow, I have difficulty telling when you are serious and when not....
Okay maybe you are right, I was kidding about his botty being pert, but saggy bum didn't have the same poetic ring
🙂


Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Moldy Crow
Well , hell then . Ought to go out and get me one those engines . Better yet , why don't you just pass those bad boys out like cheese n fuckin' crackers with a deee-lux membership package ? You'd be the most popular site on the whole damned internet . Think of all that bling ! And you sure as hell get rid of all of us whiney babies who aren't with the times .
I really can't say much about the work Dave and I do... but it's a bit more than 'having an engine'.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

couldn't we have a nice clean mudfight instead of this backhanded slagging off?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Ooooooooooooh Matron, did I say poetic ring - it was a tongue in cheek comment obviously.
Quick quick, call for the Engineers, I need a rebuild

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Moldy Crow
Well , hell then . Ought to go out and get me one those engines . Better yet , why don't you just pass those bad boys out like cheese n fuckin' crackers with a deee-lux membership package ? You'd be the most popular site on the whole damned internet . Think of all that bling ! And you sure as hell get rid of all of us whiney babies who aren't with the times .
I think your post is a little aggressive, everyones doing their best to make this a great site. Fightingeach other won't improve things.🙁

Vote Up
Vote Down

This whole 'naming names' discussion is silly. That's because, people, we're all ANONYMOUS here. Say some guy with the handle CheatyCheatCheat gets busted for engine use. He gets named in the forums, and banned. How is that going to be worse than simply being banned? There's no shaming going on, because there is nothing to connect his handle with the person he is, whom most of use have never met anyway. Shame depends on personal contact between people.
No, this 'name and shame' thing is just so that the more vindictive among us can cackle and gloat when someone who used an engine against us gets expelled. "That'll learn 'em", we cackle in our savage glee. No one messes with me!
The whole idea of 'name and shame' is kind of medieval anyway...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dfm65
This whole 'naming names' discussion is silly. That's because, people, we're all ANONYMOUS here. Say some guy with the handle CheatyCheatCheat gets busted for engine use. He gets named in the forums, and banned. How is that going to be worse than simply being banned? There's no shaming going on, because there is nothing to connect his handle with the pers ...[text shortened]... glee. No one messes with me!
The whole idea of 'name and shame' is kind of medieval anyway...
Would you support a system that says "x" many users have been banned and left the site. Also if we don't name then people won't know if the person they reported was cheating or not. Seems if you don't offer feedback people will become disilusioned.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nyxie
Seems if you don't offer feedback people will become disilusioned.
Also, innocent suspects will stay suspects. The only people who profit are actual cheaters.