Originally posted by darvlayWell the idea you put forth sounded more like a naming idea, and we seem to not have that option as david, phlab, and russ have made it clear that the admin don't want that here.
*Sigh*
From my post in this thread:
"I agree with Mr. Marauder in the fact that the subscribers should be made aware of what action the moderator team has taken to make the site as fair as possible and how they have improved the site for those who care about fair play... If through a forum thread or perhaps a bi-monthly PM to all subscribers, some kin ...[text shortened]... accomomplishment and hopefully a vote would show the Admin that this is what most users believe.
So if we all vote for naming them, and then they don't what will it accomplish? It will just be another vote. I'm all for voting, but I think this issue will lie dead regardless of how we all vote.
I think we should push more for a reform in the game mods themselves first. Better the team, and better the site. This is more important to me right now.
Phlabibit, I'm trying to have a decent convesation here, if you have a problem with me using the forums just mod my posts or ban me from them, I'm not gonna play tag with you.
1 edit
Originally posted by SirUlrichNo analysis/debate is needed when a confession is right there in writing.
I wasn't joking, but hey!! I am a paid up member I can do as I wish, if you find it irksome have a mass debate and see how many members stand up for the cheat police . . . I'm much too fast to face that test
D
Originally posted by PhlabibitHow is that you still are a game mod when Russ indeed told me that you withdrawn as a game moderator?
Please just yell 'last word!' and be done with it.
P-
What's the purpose of having a game moderator that doesn't even know which is a book move and which is not?
Don't change subject and just answer these questions ,big mouth.
Originally posted by SirUlrichIf you are truely not joking and have been or are presently using an engine , then I hope you are banned as soon as possible according to TOS . Have a great life .
I wasn't joking, but hey!! I am a paid up member I can do as I wish, if you find it irksome have a mass debate and see how many members stand up for the cheat police . . . I'm much too fast to face that test
Originally posted by Moldy CrowXiminez: Now, old lady -- you have one last chance. Confess the heinous sin of heresy, reject the works of the ungodly -- *two* last chances. And you shall be free -- *three* last chances. You have three last chances, the nature of which I have divulged in my previous utterance.
If you are truely not joking and have been or are presently using an engine , then I hope you are banned as soon as possible according to TOS . Have a great life .
Wilde: I don't know what you're talking about.
Ximinez: Right! If that's the way you want it -- Cardinal! Poke her with the soft cushions!
Ximinez: Confess! Confess! Confess!
Biggles: It doesn't seem to be hurting her, lord.
Ximinez: Have you got all the stuffing up one end?
Biggles: Yes, lord.
Ximinez (angrily hurling away the cushions): Hm! She is made of harder stuff! Cardinal Fang! Fetch...THE COMFY CHAIR!
🙂
Originally posted by NyxieHow can you be so sure it will be a dead vote?
Well the idea you put forth sounded more like a naming idea, and we seem to not have that option as david, phlab, and russ have made it clear that the admin don't want that here.
So if we all vote for naming them, and then they don't what will it accomplish? It will just be another vote. I'm all for voting, but I think this issue will lie dead regardless ...[text shortened]... ith me using the forums just mod my posts or ban me from them, I'm not gonna play tag with you.
I'm indifferent as to whether the che@ers arer named or if it's a number of che@ers exposed that is published, as long as we the players know that something proactive is being dead as opposed to waiting for idiots to admit to it in the forums.
In your experience, do they 'name names' on other chess sites?
Originally posted by SirUlrichlet's hope for your sake there aren't any ch-ch-ch-changes of the Draconian variety here...
I wasn't joking, but hey!! I am a paid up member I can do as I wish, if you find it irksome have a mass debate and see how many members stand up for the cheat police . . . I'm much too fast to face that test
Originally posted by darvlayIt has been stated that they do indeed 'name names' on playchess.
How can you be so sure it will be a dead vote?
I'm indifferent as to whether the che@ers arer named or if it's a number of che@ers exposed that is published, as long as we the players know that something proactive is being dead as opposed to waiting for idiots to admit to it in the forums.
In your experience, do they 'name names' on other chess sites?
Originally posted by RavelloI know what book moves are from my personal database, as well as chess lab. Who said I didn't?
How is that you still are a game mod when Russ indeed told me that you withdrawn as a game moderator?
What's the purpose of having a game moderator that doesn't even know which is a book move and which is not?
Don't change subject and just answer these questions ,big mouth.
P-