The moonbus red thumbs poll

@suzianne said
This tactic used to be called, "Hold on until I get the dictionary down."

It isn't "a tactic", Suzianne. I am simply drawing attention to your hyperbole without having to type several sentences about your diagnosis of personality disorder and neurosis.

@fmf said
Anonymous red thumbs are just inane meaningless social media fluff. They do not rank, in my mind, as grown-up "disagreement, dissent and criticism".

We know how you treat posters you disagree with. This pushback is an attempt to keep you from becoming unleashed on innocent bystanders. And yes, we get how you rank things by importance in your mind. "Me, me, me, me, me and me."

@moonbus said
Nonsense. Get a life.

I get that you disagree with me. And I get that you are taking the disagreement rather personally.

-Removed-

People have been drummed off this site for far less.

@suzianne said
We know how you treat posters you disagree with. This pushback is an attempt to keep you from becoming unleashed on innocent bystanders. And yes, we get how you rank things by importance in your mind. "Me, me, me, me, me and me."

I think this is a mischaracterization of my contribution to these forums.

-Removed-

A meaningful result? Of course. Unlike what you did.

-Removed-

Go ahead, keep speaking in trivialities.

@fmf said
You are mistaken on both counts.

No, he's not. Your forum history proves him right.

@fmf said
One-day games aren't an infantile site feature.

That's only your opinion.

I believe they exist for one purpose. For people to earn wins based on their opponent's inaction and not on their own skill.

Cheap wins are infantile, yes.

@suzianne said
No, he's not. Your forum history proves him right.

I don't think it does. He is mistaken.

@suzianne said
That's only your opinion.

It's only my opinion, too, that anonymous thumbs are silly and not worthy of this website.

@fmf said
So much for "keeping track of this subject". You posted on the thread about this subject several times after the poll was started and before it expired.

The poll was buried almost instantly, I'm sure. That is why no one saw it.

Did you PM to your comrades the exact page number it was on?

Of course you did.

@suzianne said
I believe they exist for one purpose. For people to earn wins based on their opponent's inaction and not on their own skill.Cheap wins are infantile, yes.

Presumably "they" refers to one-day chess games. I think they are for people who want to play one-day games. I don't see how that is infantile or how the option to have one-day games is an infantile facility. Indeed it is a positive feature. I don't see any valid comparison with anonymous thumbs.

@suzianne said
The poll was buried almost instantly, I'm sure. That is why no one saw it.

It was on a thread about thumbs that you were posting on.

@suzianne said
Did you PM to your comrades the exact page number it was on?

No. I didn't send out any PMs.