@suziannesaid This tactic used to be called, "Hold on until I get the dictionary down."
It isn't "a tactic", Suzianne. I am simply drawing attention to your hyperbole without having to type several sentences about your diagnosis of personality disorder and neurosis.
@fmfsaid Anonymous red thumbs are just inane meaningless social media fluff. They do not rank, in my mind, as grown-up "disagreement, dissent and criticism".
We know how you treat posters you disagree with. This pushback is an attempt to keep you from becoming unleashed on innocent bystanders. And yes, we get how you rank things by importance in your mind. "Me, me, me, me, me and me."
@suziannesaid We know how you treat posters you disagree with. This pushback is an attempt to keep you from becoming unleashed on innocent bystanders. And yes, we get how you rank things by importance in your mind. "Me, me, me, me, me and me."
I think this is a mischaracterization of my contribution to these forums.
@fmfsaid So much for "keeping track of this subject". You posted on the thread about this subject several times after the poll was started and before it expired.
The poll was buried almost instantly, I'm sure. That is why no one saw it.
Did you PM to your comrades the exact page number it was on?
@suziannesaid I believe they exist for one purpose. For people to earn wins based on their opponent's inaction and not on their own skill.Cheap wins are infantile, yes.
Presumably "they" refers to one-day chess games. I think they are for people who want to play one-day games. I don't see how that is infantile or how the option to have one-day games is an infantile facility. Indeed it is a positive feature. I don't see any valid comparison with anonymous thumbs.