Club Tournament Restrictions

Club Tournament Restrictions

Site Ideas

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

TEXAS

STATE OF THE HEART

Joined
04 Nov 09
Moves
198473
07 Aug 11

...club leaders who like to create lots of tournaments:
...club members who like to play in lots of CLUB tournaments:
send feedback to RUSS asking for automatic acceptance/decline in tournaments with ratings minimum-maximum stated (banded) and a players minimum-maximum as well...JUST LIKE THE SITE TOURNAMENTS WORK...

m
Xelenal of Epaland

Epaladian Sea

Joined
11 Mar 11
Moves
13305
08 Aug 11

Originally posted by LEUR
...club leaders who like to create lots of tournaments:
...club members who like to play in lots of CLUB tournaments:
send feedback to RUSS asking for automatic acceptance/decline in tournaments with ratings minimum-maximum stated (banded) and a players minimum-maximum as well...JUST LIKE THE SITE TOURNAMENTS WORK...
I already have🙂

Australia

Joined
20 Jan 09
Moves
386476
09 Aug 11

Shouldn't have to do that, Russ is supposed to read the Site Ideas forum. 😕

Amersham, Bucks, UK

Joined
23 Sep 10
Moves
91673
09 Aug 11

Originally posted by LEUR
...club leaders who like to create lots of tournaments:
...club members who like to play in lots of CLUB tournaments:
send feedback to RUSS asking for automatic acceptance/decline in tournaments with ratings minimum-maximum stated (banded) and a players minimum-maximum as well...JUST LIKE THE SITE TOURNAMENTS WORK...
I support this

State of Confusion

Lancashire

Joined
04 May 08
Moves
842388
09 Aug 11

Originally posted by Hyperion7
I support this
Me too.

Mr Magic

UK

Joined
07 Jan 08
Moves
30444
09 Aug 11

Sounds like a fine idea to me. why should club tournaments run any differently. They are still subscribers only.

TEXAS

STATE OF THE HEART

Joined
04 Nov 09
Moves
198473
10 Aug 11

Originally posted by BaronVonChickenpants
Sounds like a fine idea to me. why should club tournaments run any differently. They are still subscribers only.
...you be a fine man, Baron...

Joined
13 Jul 04
Moves
624247
10 Aug 11

Originally posted by Kewpie
Shouldn't have to do that, Russ is supposed to read the Site Ideas forum. 😕
yeah but Russ only does what Russ wants to do - the rest of us can sing for what we want

JG

Joined
21 Jan 11
Moves
72604
11 Aug 11

We absolutly need banded tournaments 🙂
Also we need the posibility for zero timeout, for creating tournaments with a short playing period - for example 0/28 tourneys 😉
Also we need the possibility like in private tournaments, to invite members with a key, because we will play series of tournaments or a Player League with different Divisions for swinging up and down like in the clanleague 🙂

d

85120

Joined
03 Jan 10
Moves
37379
11 Aug 11

I am all for zero timeout, for creating tournaments with a short playing period

yes

Joined
26 Aug 05
Moves
110748
11 Aug 11

I support the idea !!

Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
83862
11 Aug 11

???for example 0/28 tourneys????
This means 0 days per move 28 day timeout!!
If you mean it the other way round,It's 7 days longer than the 7:14 quartets tournaments.
I think zero timeout games have limited appeal as some of us go away a lot or have other committments.
I rely on the timeout period(s) as I wouldn't have enough site holidays to cover all my breaks otherwise.

g

Joined
03 Feb 10
Moves
93297
11 Aug 11

I like this idea.

EB

Joined
05 Apr 04
Moves
293871
11 Aug 11

I have no wish to ell others the type of tournaments they should play in. I like timeouts of one day only. With 0 and 1 day timebanks.

Treat Everyone Equal

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Joined
04 Oct 06
Moves
599675
12 Aug 11

Originally posted by LEUR
...club leaders who like to create lots of tournaments:
automatic acceptance/decline in tournaments with ratings minimum-maximum stated (banded) and a players minimum-maximum as well...JUST LIKE THE SITE TOURNAMENTS WORK...
Excellent Idea!

A Thumbs up