23000 dead

Originally posted by telerion
Yes, what a pity, but then we'd be left with mostly ugly chicks, cyberdweebs, and a few repressed blowhards.

While, by definition, such action would decrease our population (substantially) and certainly assuage our overpopulation problem. I'm afraid the treatment may be too severe and lead to an underpopulation problem. Worse yet, the underpopulati ...[text shortened]... romiscuous again. There would be some funky looking bastards walking the earth in the meantime.

And lots and lots of Christians.

Without contraception, we should repopulate the world in no time.

🙂

Originally posted by no1marauder
Could he have pointed this out by writing a strong letter rather than mass murdering them?

HE tried that, not only did he speak to man, HE wrote it on stone.

Originally posted by darvlay
Shut up.

whoa......... I'm impressed

Originally posted by blindfaith101
HE tried that, not only did he speak to man, HE wrote it on stone.

So God failed?

Originally posted by sasquatch672
So, no middle ground?

No, say, I dunno...send maybe a big thunderstorm first? Hell, why not just come out of the clouds and say, "YO! Israel! You're pissing ME off!"

Israel had been warned over and over again. Then HE sent JESUS CHRIST. I believe that was that was the last warning.

Originally posted by no1marauder
So God failed?

GOD did not fail, man still has the freedom of choice. Listen and do or listen and ignore.

Originally posted by blindfaith101
Israel had been warned over and over again. Then HE sent JESUS CHRIST. I believe that was that was the last warning.

Sending Jesus was a "warning"? What an odd theology you have!

Originally posted by blindfaith101
GOD did not fail, man still has the freedom of choice. Listen and do or listen and ignore.

Sure he failed. YOU said "he tried that" i.e. he tried to persuade Man to mend his sinful ways. Man didn't. So, IF God tried something and it didn't work, he failed. That's the English language.

Originally posted by no1marauder
Sending Jesus was a "warning"? What an odd theology you have!

GOD sent JESUE CHRIST to bring Salvation, and also once again warn Mankind once again what is comming.

Originally posted by no1marauder
Sure he failed. YOU said "he tried that" i.e. he tried to persuade Man to mend his sinful ways. Man didn't. So, IF God tried something and it didn't work, he failed. That's the English language.

Man failed. You keep blaming GOD, but you never put the blame where it belongs. On mankind and the forces of evil.

Originally posted by sasquatch672
no1, you have to be really careful with your language. If you address bf101 as "YOU" for like two consecutive days, HE will note your capitalization and think you view HIM as the Second Coming. And then all hell will break loose.

Jesus man, think!

Jesus man, think!

Now, don't go calling no1 "Jesus man" - or people will REALLY think he is HIM.

Originally posted by blindfaith101
Man failed. You keep blaming GOD, but you never put the blame where it belongs. On mankind and the forces of evil.

Grow up. I don't "blame God" since I'm certain your God doesn't exist. What I am trying to point out to you is that you either use language very incorrectly or your ideas are very confused or most likely, both. YOU said God "tried" something; when something is "tried" and it doesn't succeed in what it was "trying" to do, it "fails". This is the English language. "Try" and learn it.

Originally posted by lucifershammer
No, you need to put on your "Dad" hat.

How does the "Dad" hat help? Would a father kill some of his children to show the others that it's not a good idea to do something wrong? Maybe I need a new hat.