Originally posted by JS357
You say; "I think that God, who creates beings with free will, knew that it was a potentiality that some beings would want nothing to do with their Creator."
also,
" I believe that God knew from eternity the potential of creating beings with free will. "
Respecting your adherence to Biblical sources in this thread, I ask two things:
What are the Bi ...[text shortened]... he bestowal? Or did God choose to be ignorant of the actual outcomes of the bestowal?
Excuse the delay JS357,
You say; "I think that God, who creates beings with free will, knew that it was a potentiality that some beings would want nothing to do with their Creator."
Yes. We are dealing with a wisdom and knowledge that has the ultimate foresight and foreknowledge.
also,
" I believe that God knew from eternity the potential of creating beings with free will. "
Yes. Human words are limited. We think in terms of time and cannot hardly think otherwise. The phrase
from eternity is my limited way of expressing that probably all eternity is known to God perfectly. That is what free beings will choose or change their choice or change again or decide for this or for that.
Some see a conflict in God knowing and man's so-called freedom. That dilemma has not yet stumped me. He knows. We do not know. And neither do we sense any coercion or usurpation of our freedom to choose.
If there is something deeper going on, I don't know very much about that yet.
Respecting your adherence to Biblical sources in this thread, I ask two things:
What are the Biblical sources for what you think, and believe, as stated in these two quotes, about God knowing the potential outcomes of the bestowal of free will?
I don't know if I could give you a quote that is not arguable. My interpretations of Scripture are not infallible.
But at the moment a verse which I recently mused over suggests that God has granted the freedom of two kinds of people to continued just as they are if they so wish. This is Revelation 22:11 -
"Let him who does unrighteousness do unrighteousness still; and let him who is filthy be filthy still; and let him who is righteous do righteousness still; and let him who is holy be holy still."
This has the flavor to me of God saying in essence " Do not interfere with the choice of living that each one makes. If he is filthy and unrighteous, just let him continue in that state. If he is holy and righteous being associated with the holy and righteous Lord and Savior - let him just continue in that enjoyment.
Can you sense the freedom in this passage. "Let each just follow his self chosen way of life."
Now if you consider the life of Joseph in the book of Genesis, you should detect God's absolute foreknowledge. Joseph had a dream of being exalted over his parents and his brothers. For this dream his brothers hated him. And for this dream they persecuted him and sold him to slave owners. Then in Egypt God used his misfortune as a catalyst to fulfill the very dreams that got him into trouble.
This was a wonderful window into the foreknowledge of God and His transcendence over time as we know it.
The way I see it the brothers didn't HAVE to hate Joseph for his dream. But when they did God used it to work for the blessing of Joseph in a sovereign way. The foreknowledge of God seems to have been at work. And the freedom of choice of the jealous brothers who envied him was at work as well.
I think we just have to accept the fact that God greatly transcends us. I don't think the fact diminishes man's creature dignity. It may simply place man in proper perspective in relation to God who loves him so extensively - as proved by the coming of Jesus His Son.
Second, what if any Biblical sources would limit God to knowing the potential of these outcomes,
I would not argue too much over this. In the example I gave of the life of Joseph in Genesis the dreams Joseph had and how they came true show something of God's foreknowledge and providence and man's choices.
He has the ability to cause all things to work together for good to those who love God and who are called according to His purpose.
and not know the actuality of precisely which creatures would go to the evil side, and when, and how, they would do this? Did the bestowal of free will by God necessarily entail His ignorance as to the actual outcomes of the bestowal? Or did God choose to be ignorant of the actual outcomes of the bestowal?
I tend to think that God knows what you will choose. I could be wrong. But I don't think we know. To our sense we can come to Him or we can go from Him. And we can change our mind. And we can change our mind again. He know we would choose. He knew we would choose again. And He knew we would choose yet again.
In other words I cannot fault God or His foreknowledge. Some say God's foreknowledge means we do not have freedom in choice. But I don't think that is so. But it is a rather deep philosophical paradox which has been batted around by very smart minds for a very long time.
I think God knew that this being would become Satan. Putting my finger on a passage that definitely states that, I might not be able to do. So it is my musing on an interpretation of biblical themes.
My interpretation is not infallible.
None of this causes me to hesitate believing what is clearly told about the origin of Satan in either Ezekiel 28 or Isaiah 14. Either way, those facts are simple there. And a earthly king of Tyre doesn't make good sense for the qualities described in many instances of that being. Rather a superhuman person better fits the characteristics in too many places.