Go back
Atheists vs Agnostics

Atheists vs Agnostics

Spirituality


Originally posted by @fmf
This is 500 words of you playing the man rather than the ball.
Oh, the extreme irony.

With you, the only reason to play the ball is to "play the man".

But that's what happens when this lame argument is all you have left.

There IS NO ball, jackass.


Originally posted by @suzianne
Oh, the extreme irony.

With you, the only reason to play the ball is to "play the man".

But that's what happens when this lame argument is all you have left.

There IS NO ball, jackass.
If you don't like my contributions - from my non-Christian perspective - to the debates and discussions that we all have here on this forum, then so be it.


Originally posted by @sonhouse
Sorry to butt in on this but what about the arguments FMF is making in regards to Sonship?
Are you saying he has made the same points over and over again and Sonship making the same counter? I haven't read the last 10 years of this so don't know. And in THIS post Sonship hasn't even weighed in at least not yet.
They are less "arguments" and more "whining".

And yes, he brings up the same topics ad nauseum. I wish that boy would go buy an imagination or something. And yeah, that too is partially my point. Sonship usually doesn't have to answer, FMF just keeps going like a little energizer attack bunny.

The thing is that it's not just sonship. It's any Christian who dares to say anything directly to him.


Originally posted by @suzianne
They are less "arguments" and more "whining".

And yes, he brings up the same topics ad nauseum. I wish that boy would go buy an imagination or something. And yeah, that too is partially my point. Sonship usually doesn't have to answer, FMF just keeps going like a little energizer attack bunny.

The thing is that it's not just sonship. It's any Christian who dares to say anything directly to him.
If you don't like what I bring to the debates and discussions here, Suzianne, you can surely just ignore my posts, right?


-Removed-
So stop dodging and "play the ball".

As DG says, "Try addressing the succinct point in my post", you know, instead of deflecting and dodging.

For your review, the post I'm talking about is my long post on page 5. The point here, the actual "ball", is the way YOU post in this forum, attacking Christians ever since you rode in here fresh from getting kicked out of the Debate Forum.

You both are always on about how this is a "debate" forum. So go ahead, "address the succinct points in my post". Play the ball I set before you. Explain why you continually attack Christians. And if you have the guts, explain the motivation behind all the little tricks you use to make people who disagree with you somehow less than you. Explain how you always end up telling little white lies about posters you don't like often enough until the sheer bulk of them hits a critical mass and people suddenly start agreeing with you. No? Then maybe, instead, you'll actually try to defend these actions you take as part and parcel of your "forum combat" persona here.

You're always shutting down people when they talk about you, and yet you love to talk about how other people post. Come on then, practice what you preach, for once. Stand and deliver, instead of running away.


Originally posted by @suzianne
For your review, the post I'm talking about is my long post on page 5. The point here, the actual "ball", is the way YOU post in this forum, attacking Christians ever since you rode in here fresh from getting kicked out of the Debate Forum.
Who was kicked out of the Debate Forum?


Originally posted by @suzianne
So go ahead, "address the succinct points in my post". Play the ball I set before you. Explain why you continually attack Christians. And if you have the guts, explain the motivation behind all the little tricks you use to make people who disagree with you somehow less than you. Explain how you always end up telling little white lies about posters you ...[text shortened]... h until the sheer bulk of them hits a critical mass and people suddenly start agreeing with you.
I think this is a wholly inaccurate description of my contribution here.

1 edit

1 edit


-Removed-
Do you think it’s impossible to be intellectually honest and disagree with you?



-Removed-
So if it is possible to be intellectually honest and disagree with you what are you on about?


2 edits

-Removed-
What do you think I’m being intellectually dishonest about? By the way, what do you hope to achieve with your insults other than drive people away?