Bible Works vs Faith

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Your post merely highlighted how inconsistent the bible is.

I suppose that would appear that way for those who do not know God.

Once you understand the difference between the new covenant and the old covenant you might see the light.

Originally posted by Eladar
I suppose that would appear that way for those who do not know God.

Didn't you yourself the other day, in order to wriggle out of answering a straight forward question, say that you did not know God?

Originally posted by FMF
Didn't you yourself the other day, in order to wriggle out of answering a straight forward question, say that you did not know God?

No, I probably said that I am not God.

Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk
Could also be your understanding of the Bible that is not consistent. 😉

Should we compare theology degrees?

😛

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Should we compare theology degrees?

😛

A theology degree would give you such a great understanding of the Bible.

Originally posted by Eladar
No, I probably said that I am not God.

You said you had "no concept of God".

Originally posted by FMF
Old flannel about it being "the other way round" or not being "the other way round" is a red herring. If the doctrine you claim to subscribe to says there [b]must be works ~ otherwise the faith is "dead" ~ then why do you never seem to say that there must be works? If the works are not optional according to your theology, why is it that you have never said so, as far as I can recall?[/b]

More "cart before the horse".

How many more times do I have to say it?

This is more of your "same old". Naysaying what people say, just so you can repeat your question to make it seem like you didn't get an answer just because you don't like that answer, is not a discussion.

Originally posted by FMF
You said you had "no concept of God".

I'll have to take your word for it.

Originally posted by Suzianne
More "cart before the horse".

How many more times do I have to say it?

This is more of your "same old". Naysaying what people say, just so you can repeat your question to make it seem like you didn't get an answer just because you don't like that answer, is not a discussion.

More dodging.

Originally posted by FMF
More dodging.

I call that bouncing your ball.

Originally posted by Eladar
I call that bouncing your ball.

If Suzianne doesn't want to debate or discuss anything, why does she follow me round the the debates and discussions on the Spirituality Forum pointedly posting ad hominems and other dodges and deflections?

Originally posted by Eladar
I'll have to take your word for it.

What you actually said was "I do not have a perception about God".

Originally posted by FMF
What you actually said was "I do not have a perception about God".

In the context of is a person going to hell or heaven?

Originally posted by Eladar
In the context of is a person going to hell or heaven?

Not really. You just wanted to avoid saying what you believed about the nature of your God as you see Him so you blurted out "I do not have a perception about God."

Originally posted by FMF
Not really. You just wanted to avoid saying what you believed about the nature of your God as you see Him so you blurted out "I do not have a perception about God."

Meaning I can't judge God. Maybe if you can actually find the discussion as opposed to telling me your recollections.