Go back
Divorced after 25 happy years

Divorced after 25 happy years

Spirituality


@kellyjay said
I was saying that if the marriage is only as good up to something better comes, it isn't based on love.
This isn't what the allegory in the OP is about. Nothing remotely like this was said about Chris and Donna. It specifically said that they were happy and in love. It says nothing about their marriage not being "based on love". And there was nothing about it being a case of waiting till "something better" comes along.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
If you are committed, what does that mean to you? Up to when you are not?
To me personally, because of my Catholic background, it means until death. But that doesn't mean I am going to say something as ridiculous as if the commitment ends then you were never committed. Chris and Donna were committed to each other and happily married for almost 25 years. Would it be a lie to say they were in love 15 years ago? No. Would it be a lie to say they were committed 15 years ago? No.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
Oh my, the irony!
I don't think you are using the word "irony" correctly. I say "Oh the irony" from time to time; don't mimic me if you don't know what the word means.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
I was pestering you with questions trying to get you to make what you were saying to make sense to me; you asked for thoughts; you didn't say preapproved thoughts that only looked at this analogy the way you wanted.
I perceived you as running away from an adult allegory that made your allegory seem distinctly half-baked and numb to the reality of faith.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Was Chris and Donna's love real, even though after 25 years they ended up getting divorced? Yes.

Is your faith real, KellyJay? Yes, it is.

Was my faith real? Yes, it was.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
This form of "knowing someone" - here in the lives we live - is totally different from the "knowing someone" [i.e. Jesus] that occurs with faith.

This makes your analogy a dud ~ and borderline sophistry, in fact, to my way of thinking.

See the OP to this thread instead.
It is either true or not. If it was never true, it never was.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
This isn't what the allegory in the OP is about. Nothing remotely like this was said about Chris and Donna. It specifically said that they were happy and in love. It says nothing about their marriage not being "based on love". And there was nothing about it being a case of waiting till "something better" comes along.
Thoughts happen when we look at something and think about what was written. What it was about to you and me was not the same thing, and I asked questions that could get me to where we could agree; you saw that as a character deficiency, I guess.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
To me personally, because of my Catholic background, it means until death. But that doesn't mean I am going to say something as ridiculous as if the commitment ends then you were never committed. Chris and Donna were committed to each other and happily married for almost 25 years. Would it be a lie to say they were in love 15 years ago? No. Would it be a lie to say they were committed 15 years ago? No.
If a commitment were real, it would endure anything; a breaking of faith of one being uncommitted and betraying of faith and vows by infidelity is from scripture for a cause to divorce. Otherwise, our faith is based on the fidelity of each other and should endure if it's true love and commitment. A feeling is fleeting; it comes and goes wherever the wind takes it. Again, how you define love matters!

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
Thoughts happen when we look at something and think about what was written. What it was about to you and me was not the same thing, and I asked questions that could get me to where we could agree; you saw that as a character deficiency, I guess.
I have "experiential knowledge" of faith. Your contention that it supernaturally transforms you and in so doing makes faith only comprehensible to those who profess it = the emperor's rhetorical birthday suit.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
If a commitment were real, it would endure anything.
I think this is something from your ideological petri dish. In the real world, in real human beings' marriages, commitment can last for 5 years, or 15 years, 25 years, or 50 years and can sometimes be broken nevertheless. It does not mean they were not "real". Love, like faith, can fade and eventually be lost. We are human beings, KellyJay, not androids.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
a breaking of faith of one being uncommitted and betraying of faith and vows by infidelity is from scripture for a cause to divorce. Otherwise, our faith is based on the fidelity of each other and should endure if it's true love and commitment.
There is nothing about "infidelity" in the OP's allegory.

I don't have any reason to believe that your faith is any more or less "true" than mine was in, say, 1980, or 1985, or 1990, or 1995, or 2000.

For you to insist otherwise is just you doubling down into some form of self-mythologizing with a generous sprinkle of narcissism thrown on top.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
Thoughts happen when we look at something and think about what was written. What it was about to you and me was not the same thing, and I asked questions that could get me to where we could agree; you saw that as a character deficiency, I guess.
You saw that as a character deficiency, I guess.

I think you have been in Intermittent Low Integrity Mode for a couple of months now, KellyJay. You became like this the last two times you suddenly went into a huff and stopped talking to me for a year or so.

I fully expect you to shut up shop again soon and if the alternative is that you would merely continue with the way you have been conducting yourself [these last two months or so], then I'd probably welcome it.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
You saw that as a character deficiency, I guess.

I think you have been in Intermittent Low Integrity Mode for a couple of months now, KellyJay. You became like this the last two times you suddenly went into a huff and stopped talking to me for a year or so.

I fully expect you to shut up shop again soon and if the alternative is that you would merely continue with the way you have been conducting yourself [these last two months or so], then I'd probably welcome it.
I don't think you see the difference between saying I'm in love and I will love you till the day I die.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
I don't think you see the difference between saying I'm in love and I will love you till the day I die.
Someone saying - and meaning - with all their heart - that they will love someone until the day they die does not mean that they actually WILL love them till the day they die. We are human beings, KellyJay.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Have we arrived at a point where KellyJay thinks that, if X said in 1979 that they would love Y till the day they died, and then they split in 2004, X was LYING in 1979, or X never LOVED Y, or X and Y were never COMMITTED to each other?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.