20 Apr '22 00:09>
Donna is perfect. Chris a crying little btch.
@fmf saidI gave you my thoughts already, what was true who knows.
Now that you understand my allegory, your thoughts?
@kellyjay said"What was true, who knows?" What do you mean?
I gave you my thoughts already, what was true who knows.
@kellyjay saidThe 'prize' for reading between the lines is not needing to have someone else explain the meaning to me.
Are you going to give him a prize for figuring it out?
@kellyjay saidIf Chris and Donna told you that they were you in love for 23 years, would you continue to entertain the ideas that [1] they might be lying to you, and that, regardless of what they say about themselves, [2] they were never in love?
I gave you my thoughts already, what was true who knows.
@fmf saidHe may mean that no one knows whether Chis and Donna's love was real and faded, or imagined or feigned, or just not as deep as they had hoped.
"What was true, who knows?" What do you mean?
@moonbus saidI think KellyJay is being deliberately flippant and wishy-washy about it because my allegory is better than his.
He may mean that no one knows whether Chis and Donna's love was real and faded, or imagined or feigned, or just not as deep as they had hoped.
@fmf saidSorry, no prize in Spirituality for who has the best allegory. Try the prose fiction contest next year. 😉
I think KellyJay is being deliberately flippant and wishy-washy about it because my allegory is better than his.
@moonbus saidI don't care much for writing more than about 170 words at a time ["musicologies" on my radio programme called "Box 39"] which take about 65 seconds to read, but I am like a pig in s**t writing strictly exactly and precisely 100 words. This does not seem to fall within the realm of the prose fiction contests run on the General Forum.
Try the prose fiction contest next year.
@fmf saidWell, when I broached the subject of love, you said I was off the OP mark. So not sure what you want me to say; if we cannot define love, whatever they tell me can be anything at all; no definition for love; whatever they say is good enough. The only time that a lie would be involved is if what they were saying was not true; if you cannot define what it is, they are talking about how they could say it is true or not, don't know what they mean.
If Chris and Donna told you that they were you in love for 23 years, would you continue to entertain the ideas that [1] they might be lying to you, and that, regardless of what they say about themselves, [2] they were never in love?
@kellyjay saidIt is, indeed. The topic is your ludicrous stance on losing faith as evidenced by the surely-it's-deliberate inanity of your allegory about "20 years a neighbour... now you deny it?".
Yea, that is staying on topic.
@kellyjay saidThe OP is an allegory about losing faith.
Well, when I broached the subject of love, you said I was off the OP mark. So not sure what you want me to say; if we cannot define love, whatever they tell me can be anything at all; no definition for love; whatever they say is good enough. The only time that a lie would be involved is if what they were saying was not true; if you cannot define what it is, they are talking about how they could say it is true or not, don't know what they mean.