Originally posted by @secondsonPssssssst...
Your issue is unbelief, which renders your recognition of Jesus' description of Himself in Matthew 11:29 as autobiographical inoperative.
Biography is something one writes about somebody else.
Autobiography is something one writes about oneself.
So, technically, Matthew is biographical, not autobiographical, even though it contains quotes. Matthew wrote what Jesus said, Jesus did not write Matthew.
Originally posted by @secondsonNope. I don't have any issue with the fact that I am not a Christian, nor - indeed - with the fact that you are one. You have simply misused the word "autobiographical". Jesus famously did not write a single word - that we know of - about himself.
Your issue is unbelief, which renders your recognition of Jesus' description of Himself in Matthew 11:29 as autobiographical inoperative.
1 edit
Originally posted by @suzianneThat’s a really great point, suzianne. Two thumbs up
Pssssssst...
Biography is something one writes about somebody else.
Autobiography is something one writes about oneself.
So, technically, Matthew is biographical, not autobiographical, even though it contains quotes. Matthew wrote what Jesus said, Jesus did not write Matthew.
Originally posted by @suziannePsssssssst...
Pssssssst...
Biography is something one writes about somebody else.
Autobiography is something one writes about oneself.
So, technically, Matthew is biographical, not autobiographical, even though it contains quotes. Matthew wrote what Jesus said, Jesus did not write Matthew.
This is what I wrote. "It's interesting that verse 29 of Matthew 11 is the only place in the synoptic gospels where Jesus makes a personal autobiographical description of Himself."
I did not say Jesus wrote it. I said, "Jesus makes a personal autobiographical description of Himself."
Matthew recorded what Jesus said. What Jesus said about Himself was autobiographical because it wasn't Matthew saying it about Jesus.
Originally posted by @fmfYou have issues with reading comprehension too.
Nope. I don't have any issue with the fact that I am not a Christian, nor - indeed - with the fact that you are one. You have simply misused the word "autobiographical". Jesus famously did not write a single word - that we know of - about himself.
I did not say Jesus wrote it. Matthew recorded what Jesus said about Himself.
Jesus' description of Himself is autobiographical because it is He Himself giving the description of Himself, which Matthew recorded.
Originally posted by @romans1009But for that you would need 2 accounts.....
That’s a really great point, suzianne. Two thumbs up
😵
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeAnyone who grew up in America in the 1970s would get that reference to the sitcom “Happy Days” and Arthur “Fonzie” Fonzarelli.
But for that you would need 2 accounts.....
😵
The earlier episodes rock.
Heeeeeyyyyyyy!
Originally posted by @romans1009Actually the phrase "two thumbs up" had its origins in Siskel and Ebert.
Anyone who grew up in America in the 1970s would get that reference to the sitcom “Happy Days” and Arthur “Fonzie” Fonzarelli.
The earlier episodes rock.
Heeeeeyyyyyyy!
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelConsult a dictionary if you still don't get it.
Getting what? That you think I'm ignorant ?
How so?
I'm not your schoolmarm.
Originally posted by @secondsonBut Matthew did the writing.
Psssssssst...
This is what I wrote. "It's interesting that verse 29 of Matthew 11 is the only place in the synoptic gospels where Jesus makes a personal autobiographical description of Himself."
I did not say Jesus wrote it. I said, "Jesus makes a personal autobiographical description of Himself."
Matthew recorded what Jesus said. What Jesus said about Himself was autobiographical because it wasn't Matthew saying it about Jesus.
One cannot make a "biographical" comment because look at the word, it literally means "writing about [someone's] life".
Matthew wrote about Jesus, therefore it is "biographical". As far as I know, Jesus wrote nothing.
Originally posted by @suzianneSome think Jesus may have written Hebrews. Not saying I agree with that, but that school of thought exists.
But Matthew did the writing.
One cannot make a "biographical" comment because look at the word, it literally means "writing about [someone's] life".
Matthew wrote about Jesus, therefore it is "biographical". As far as I know, Jesus wrote nothing.
The Epistle to the Hebrews is perfectly written at the highest intellectual level, and yet its authorship is a complete mystery. Not even modern, sophisticated analysis of authorship can suggest a plausible writer for this great work. Whoever wrote this apparently wrote virtually nothing else. Scholars agree that Paul certainly did not write this.
It was written after the Passion of Christ, as made clear by its references in the past tense to Jesus's work, yet before the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70.
In contrast with all other epistles and letters in the New Testament, it is misnomer to call this the "Epistle" to the Hebrews. It is not a letter; there is no introduction, and it reads like a sermon. Nor was it formally addressed to the "Hebrews"; its teachings are for all.
Continued at:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Mystery😀id_Jesus_Write_the_Epistle_to_the_Hebrews%3F