Go back
Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Proof

Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Proof

Spirituality


@moonbus said
Given unlimited time and a finite number of chemical elements, the probability that every possible combination of elements will, sometime, come about, is 1.
BS


@thinkofone said
Actually I was referring the TRUTH that your reading comprehension skills are so poor that you would cite an article that speaks strongly against that which you are trying to prove.

That and the TRUTH that no one can take you the least bit seriously when you so blatantly keep displaying your ignorance on abiogenesis and evolutionary theory.

Given this latest post of ...[text shortened]... ability to read in context as well.

In short, how your PRIDE keeps you from admitting the above.
So you can't come up with real answers that proves you believe that evolution is factual, so you have to revert to insults? That doesn't help with your case at all....
Why not try to explain why you think it's a proven fact and I'll take a look at it? That is the title of this thread is it not?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@galveston75 said
So you can't come up with real answers that proves you believe that evolution is factual, so you have to revert to insults? That doesn't help with your case at all....
Why not try to explain why you think it's a proven fact and I'll take a look at it? That is the title of this thread is it not?
The truth is that your reading comprehension skills ARE so poor that earlier you cited an article that speaks strongly against that which you are trying to prove.

True or not true?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@ThinkOfOne

Since you're continuing to ask the question, either you still haven't read the article or you didn't understand it. Which?


Which?
It is irrelevant to me asking you to talk about something.
Cowardice or laziness shoes one away to go argue with someone else.

I understand.
No, not on your wink am I going to assume "The answer is over there."

Comfort your cowardice by assuming the reading is over my head.


@galveston75 said
Another little puzzle is with whales, and other ocean mammals that use echolocation to locate food, etc. How did that evolve from a mammal that didn't have it, but for some reason ( must have been really hungry ) decided to take a dip and look for food. But it must have not been able to see very well and then decided it wasn't working and needed another way to catch dinne ...[text shortened]... Right??????? Hummmm! Sounds like the old theory thing is still just that..... No answers, no proof.
Do you understand natural selection at ALL?

1 edit

@galveston75 said
Pride???? Really???? Lol. That's good.
If evolution had even a 50/50 chance of being a reality of how it all just happened, which it isn't, this is about the dumbness thing humans have ever come up with.
Let me ask you something.

Do you think that God is so limited that, in order to create something new, he absolutely HAS to just wave a magic wand and "poof" it into existence because he so lacks any imagination to do it ANY other way? Why do you so limit God?

You do understand that time doesn't mean anything to God, right? 14.5 billion years to bring the universe to today, but you guys think it could only be 6000 years because God is on some kind of deadline?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

To deal with the elitism of "Everyone who reads well agrees with me of course" of ToO types.

David Berlinski—Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions


2 edits

@sonship said
@ThinkOfOne

Since you're continuing to ask the question, either you still haven't read the article or you didn't understand it. Which?


Which?
It is irrelevant to me asking you to talk about something.
Cowardice or laziness shoes one away to go argue with someone else.

I understand.
No, not on your wink am I going to assume "The answer is over there."

Comfort your cowardice by assuming the reading is over my head.
C'mon jaywill. The fact that you even asked the question shows that you don't understand abiogenesis or evolutionary theory. Suzianne pointed out as much on page 22.

Just read the article I cited. Then maybe you'll be able to ask a question that isn't based in ignorance.

Why are you, G75, KJ, et al. so opposed to educating yourselves?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
Let me ask you something.

Do you think that God is so limited that, in order to create something new, he absolutely HAS to just wave a magic wand and "poof" it into existence because he so lacks any imagination to do it ANY other way? Why do you so limit God?

You do understand that time doesn't mean anything to God, right? 14.5 billion years to bring the universe to today, but you guys think it could only be 6000 years because God is on some kind of deadline?
You think God lies or the Word of God is false? The 6000 is a meaningless number, one I believe in, but it doesn't matter. If God spoke the universe into existence, and we are told He did it that way in scripture, you want to take the same position several others here take? You know what the Word says, but you know better?


@kellyjay said
You think God lies or the Word of God is false? The 6000 is a meaningless number, one I believe in, but it doesn't matter. If God spoke the universe into existence, and we are told He did it that way in scripture, you want to take the same position several others here take? You know what the Word says, but you know better?
In your mind what exactly precludes God from having created the diversity of life using evolution?


@thinkofone said
In your mind what exactly precludes God from having created the diversity of life using evolution?
God is not a liar.

Vote Up
Vote Down

What are the mathematical equations or scientific chemical formula equations which prove conclusively that God does not exist ?

Caissad4 ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@ThinkOfOne

Bored with you and moved on. You don't have to c'mon with me.
Stay there if you like.


@kellyjay said
God is not a liar.
Can you elaborate on this?

As it stands, it seems likely that you're conflating YOUR interpretation of the Bible with God's word.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@ThinkOfOne

Why are you, G75, KJ, et al. so opposed to educating yourselves?


An initial step in educating oneself would be to stop wasting time listening to you brag about your elitist reading comprehension.