Originally posted by @secondson Well, I doubt you'll get a response from Rajk since he's over in another thread denying the existence of an actual being called Satan, and subsequently, I suspect, denying the literal bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Works follow after salvation. How can one do good works without first trusting? It's the logical sequence.
Originally posted by @divegeester In your opinion, what is the consequence if someone doesn’t follow Jesus’ words?
You are living it bro
Delusion
Removed
Account suspended
Joined
31 Jan '18
Moves
3456
11 Mar '18 21:16>
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke I used your own favored emoticon as a parody. I'm rather embarrassed for you, labeling yourself as you just did, as a typical troll.
(4 troll accusations in one post. Lovely).
Oh, you’re so clever.
Quick, close your browser. Your doctor, er patient, is coming in.
Originally posted by @romans1009 FMF, who purported to be a learned Christian at one time, didn’t know Ecclesiastes was in the Old Testament and now you apparently don’t know Jesus Christ’s arrival on earth was after Job lived by a few thousand years.
FMF, who purported to be a learned Christian at one time, didn’t know Ecclesiastes was in the Old Testament....
Originally posted by @romans1009 I’m not surprised at this claim as I’d be embarrassed as all get out if I made that mistake.
I am not embarrassed. You are lying. I've known which Testament of the Bible Ecclesiastes is in since about 1969 or 1970. In what year did you know it? Four years ago, presumably. You are an oaf. And you are a liar who claims to be guided by "God's Holy Spirit".
Removed
Account suspended
Joined
31 Jan '18
Moves
3456
12 Mar '18 02:58>
Originally posted by @fmf I am not embarrassed. You are lying. I've known which Testament of the Bible Ecclesiastes is in since about 1969 or 1970. In what year did you know it? Four years ago, presumably. You are an oaf. And you are a liar who claims to be guided by "God's Holy Spirit".
Why did you then quote Ecclesiastes - specifically refer to my citation of Ecclesiastes 12:13 - and then question whether Christians were supposed to observe that?
Originally posted by @romans1009 Why did you then quote Ecclesiastes - specifically refer to my citation of Ecclesiastes 12:13 - and then question whether Christians were supposed to observe that?
Come on.
I am not interested in how you are going to dissect your lie. Is your behaviour indicative of the influence of the Christian "Jesus" figure at work in you? If you believe that Christians are not required to observe their God's commandments, then so be it.
Removed
Account suspended
Joined
31 Jan '18
Moves
3456
12 Mar '18 03:08>
Originally posted by @fmf I am not interested in how you are going to dissect your lie. Is your behaviour indicative of the influence of the Christian "Jesus" figure at work in you? If you believe that Christians are not required to observe their God's commandments, then so be it.
You’re avoiding the question (as usual.) And I suspect you’re avoiding it because you got caught making an elementary error that revealed your claim of being a former Christian is, well, to be polite, made up.
We already had a conversation last night about Christians’ “obligations” (to use your word) to their religion. You sadly abandoned that conversation for pool whizzing. If you want to pick up the conversation where you left it off, feel free.
Originally posted by @romans1009 You’re avoiding the question (as usual.) And I suspect you’re avoiding it because you got caught making an elementary error that revealed your claim of being a former Christian is, well, to be polite, made up.
We already had a conversation last night about Christians’ “obligations” (to use your word) to their religion. You sadly abandoned that convers ...[text shortened]... ion for pool whizzing. If you want to pick up the conversation where you left it off, feel free.
You have been caught in a lie. I didn't quote Ecclesiastes. You did.