Originally posted by @romans1009I used your own favored emoticon as a parody. I'm rather embarrassed for you, labeling yourself as you just did, as a typical troll.
Typical troll post by the Head Troll Emeritus.
You’re really trolling like your old self and showin’ the young uns a thing or two about trolling.
Just don’t over-exert yourself!
(4 troll accusations in one post. Lovely).
Originally posted by @secondsonLmfao
Well, I doubt you'll get a response from Rajk since he's over in another thread denying the existence of an actual being called Satan, and subsequently, I suspect, denying the literal bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Works follow after salvation. How can one do good works without first trusting? It's the logical sequence.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeOh, you’re so clever.
I used your own favored emoticon as a parody. I'm rather embarrassed for you, labeling yourself as you just did, as a typical troll.
(4 troll accusations in one post. Lovely).
Quick, close your browser. Your doctor, er patient, is coming in.
Originally posted by @romans1009FMF, who purported to be a learned Christian at one time, didn’t know Ecclesiastes was in the Old Testament....
FMF, who purported to be a learned Christian at one time, didn’t know Ecclesiastes was in the Old Testament and now you apparently don’t know Jesus Christ’s arrival on earth was after Job lived by a few thousand years.
This is a lie.
Originally posted by @secondsonAre you one of the sheep of Christ?
Without faith it is impossible to please God. Faith comes first, then salvation, and works follow.
Without salvation one is dead to doing good works. Before salvation one is merely a "whited wall" incapable of doing good works.
Read carefully James 1:26
[b]"For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also."
Wit ...[text shortened]... e good works which are the evidence of faith.
Faith. Salvation. Spirit. Works. In that order.[/b]
Originally posted by @romans1009I am not embarrassed. You are lying. I've known which Testament of the Bible Ecclesiastes is in since about 1969 or 1970. In what year did you know it? Four years ago, presumably. You are an oaf. And you are a liar who claims to be guided by "God's Holy Spirit".
I’m not surprised at this claim as I’d be embarrassed as all get out if I made that mistake.
Originally posted by @fmfWhy did you then quote Ecclesiastes - specifically refer to my citation of Ecclesiastes 12:13 - and then question whether Christians were supposed to observe that?
I am not embarrassed. You are lying. I've known which Testament of the Bible Ecclesiastes is in since about 1969 or 1970. In what year did you know it? Four years ago, presumably. You are an oaf. And you are a liar who claims to be guided by "God's Holy Spirit".
Come on.
Originally posted by @romans1009I am not interested in how you are going to dissect your lie. Is your behaviour indicative of the influence of the Christian "Jesus" figure at work in you? If you believe that Christians are not required to observe their God's commandments, then so be it.
Why did you then quote Ecclesiastes - specifically refer to my citation of Ecclesiastes 12:13 - and then question whether Christians were supposed to observe that?
Come on.
Originally posted by @fmfYou’re avoiding the question (as usual.) And I suspect you’re avoiding it because you got caught making an elementary error that revealed your claim of being a former Christian is, well, to be polite, made up.
I am not interested in how you are going to dissect your lie. Is your behaviour indicative of the influence of the Christian "Jesus" figure at work in you? If you believe that Christians are not required to observe their God's commandments, then so be it.
We already had a conversation last night about Christians’ “obligations” (to use your word) to their religion. You sadly abandoned that conversation for pool whizzing. If you want to pick up the conversation where you left it off, feel free.
Originally posted by @romans1009You have been caught in a lie. I didn't quote Ecclesiastes. You did.
You’re avoiding the question (as usual.) And I suspect you’re avoiding it because you got caught making an elementary error that revealed your claim of being a former Christian is, well, to be polite, made up.
We already had a conversation last night about Christians’ “obligations” (to use your word) to their religion. You sadly abandoned that convers ...[text shortened]... ion for pool whizzing. If you want to pick up the conversation where you left it off, feel free.
Originally posted by @romans1009It's all here on Thread 176226
If you want to pick up the conversation where you left it off, feel free.