1. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    20 May '06 01:08
    Originally posted by Halitose
    Think of it this way:

    God is outside of time -- so he sees everything inside time like it was the present.
    I was going to bring this up - you beat me to it. If god is outside of time, I guess that means that every instant exists at the same time for god, your past, present and future? But god also does the free will thing. That would imply there must be billions of alternate universes that god is also omnipresent in, which represents all of those possible futures, presents and pasts, no?
  2. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    20 May '06 01:10
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    You were late.
    Only if YOU are god, Freaky. Not claiming that now too, are ya?
  3. Standard memberknightmeister
    knightmeister
    Uk
    Joined
    21 Jan '06
    Moves
    443
    20 May '06 08:13
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    I was going to bring this up - you beat me to it. If god is outside of time, I guess that means that every instant exists at the same time for god, your past, present and future? But god also does the free will thing. That would imply there must be billions of alternate universes that god is also omnipresent in, which represents all of those possible futures, presents and pasts, no?
    Why would it imply billions of alternate universes? There are already billions of potential choices we could make in this one. Even though there are billlions of choices available we only need one of them because we can only make one choice at a time. If you go into a supermarket there are millions of combinations of choices you could make , but since you are confined to only making one of them you only need one supermarket , not millions of alternate ones.
  4. Standard memberknightmeister
    knightmeister
    Uk
    Joined
    21 Jan '06
    Moves
    443
    20 May '06 08:25
    Originally posted by chronicman
    I keep being told to consider things about God that God has not told us to consider about him.
    Why would I assume God travels through time. There is no mention of this anywhere in the bible.
    The bible doses say God knows everything. The bible doses say GOD has given man freewill.
    When you apply them together one has to be false. I am missing something ...[text shortened]... o be pointed out to me. When someone comes across it in the bible let me know where I missed it.
    It does not say he travels in time . It DOES say he stands outside time and is eternal. It is this Biblical , eternal quality of God that enables him to know everything about our lives , not some psychic ability to 'predict' pre-determined events. You need to think what it means for God to be outside time. What you call future , past , present is all 'now' for him. I know it's a mind twister but so is quantum physics. The principle is quite simple really but thinking about it is wierd because we live in time and imagine God looks along the timeline from the past into the present like we do. Whereas infact he looks at it sideways as it were. He already knows what you will do tomorrow NOT because he predicts it but because he is already in tomorrow watching you do whatever you freely chose to do. The time travel analogy clearly shows how freedom of will and knowing what someone will do are compatable.
  5. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    15 Sep '04
    Moves
    7051
    20 May '06 10:06
    Originally posted by knightmeister
    Why would it imply billions of alternate universes? There are already billions of potential choices we could make in this one. Even though there are billlions of choices available we only need one of them because we can only make one choice at a time. If you go into a supermarket there are millions of combinations of choices you could make , but since ...[text shortened]... fined to only making one of them you only need one supermarket , not millions of alternate ones.
    I can only assume that scottishinnz was thinking of the "other-worlds theory" in which possible futures exist as independent universes. Thus, a person at any point in time might choose several actions, though only one of them can exist in each universe.
  6. Joined
    03 Feb '04
    Moves
    77968
    20 May '06 10:30
    We have limited free will. I believe our lives are pre determined up to a point.

    At times in our lives we will have decisions to make, not simple ones like left or right, but important ones, like running in the path of an oncoming car to save a child or not etc.

    These are what I call .defining moments'. These are the only decisions that are not made for us. In these cases we have free will.

    Our lives are like a series of paths with forks, the forks are the defining moments.
  7. Joined
    24 Mar '06
    Moves
    2083
    20 May '06 12:37
    I would like to thank everyone for there comments thus far, I have been given a lot to ponder, and that’s what I was after
  8. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    15 Sep '04
    Moves
    7051
    20 May '06 23:25
    Originally posted by saffa73
    We have limited free will. I believe our lives are pre determined up to a point.

    At times in our lives we will have decisions to make, not simple ones like left or right, but important ones, like running in the path of an oncoming car to save a child or not etc.

    These are what I call .defining moments'. These are the only decisions that are not made f ...[text shortened]... e will.

    Our lives are like a series of paths with forks, the forks are the defining moments.
    We have limited free will. I believe our lives are pre determined up to a point.
    How can something be predetermined up to a point? If we accept God is omniscient then the our lives are determined completely. If you accept that your life is partly dtermined, then you imply that at some point in your life, you could do multiples actions. So what made you choose one of those multiple actions. If your life is partly determined you imply that nothing made you do either. Thus your actions would be random.

    Our lives are like a series of paths with forks, the forks are the defining moments.
    In all your examples, somethig must have caused you to act in such a way. So it would more like travelling down a single path with no forks.

    I dont believe you understand the implications of your argument. You suggest that to an extent our actions are indeterminate or partly determined or predetermined up until a point. However, while this might entail free will it is nonsensical because it precludes any moral responsibility. If you say that at time t, I could have done X or Y, and the defining action would be X, there must be a reason for you to choose X over Y or the otherway around. This reason would exclude alternative actions and contradict a partial deterministic attitude. If you deny a reason, then you are condemned to randomness (since nothig causes you to do X or Y - including yourself!). This would not reaaly allow for a "defining moment".
  9. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    15 Sep '04
    Moves
    7051
    20 May '06 23:26
    Originally posted by chronicman
    I would like to thank everyone for there comments thus far, I have been given a lot to ponder, and that’s what I was after
    No worries. 🙂
  10. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    21 May '06 03:31
    Originally posted by chronicman
    I would like to thank everyone for there comments thus far, I have been given a lot to ponder, and that’s what I was after
    God gave us free will because God is a God of love. You cannot have love if you do not have both parties possessing the ability to reciprocate love one to another. Does God know who will love him back you may ask? Yes. Does this mean we have no free will, no. God can give us free will but still know where that will lead. If this were not the case, we sould not have porphesy in the Bible. If God's creation never chose to reject him you might think this would make his creation flawless and perfect. However, you could make the arguement that God did not really give us the free will to reject him if no one ever chose to do so could you not? So, the best case scenerio is what we have now. Some accept him and some reject him. Now no one can argue that the choice was made for them.
  11. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    21 May '06 04:31
    Originally posted by knightmeister
    Why would it imply billions of alternate universes? There are already billions of potential choices we could make in this one. Even though there are billlions of choices available we only need one of them because we can only make one choice at a time. If you go into a supermarket there are millions of combinations of choices you could make , but since ...[text shortened]... fined to only making one of them you only need one supermarket , not millions of alternate ones.
    Wrong. If free will is truely free and god exists at all points in time simultaneously, then it is an absolute logical requirement that universes in which each one of those choices is made differently exists. If this isn't the case, then only one universe exists, and there are no free choices.
  12. Standard memberOmnislash
    Digital Blasphemy
    Omnipresent
    Joined
    16 Feb '03
    Moves
    21533
    21 May '06 06:01
    How about we try this one on for size.

    I believe in free will. I believe it is the moral existence of a creation of a morally perfect God. Perhaps due to the attributes of God (omnipotence, omniscience, etc.) I can not logically explain the will of God. Logical explanation is dependant upon an ability to understand. I can not understand the infinite. I simply trust in it.
  13. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    21 May '06 06:24
    Originally posted by Omnislash
    How about we try this one on for size.

    I believe in free will. I believe it is the moral existence of a creation of a morally perfect God. Perhaps due to the attributes of God (omnipotence, omniscience, etc.) I can not logically explain the will of God. Logical explanation is dependant upon an ability to understand. I can not understand the infinite. I simply trust in it.
    Come on Omni, we all know you're not one to shy from a challenge! Can't understand the will of God? Rubbish. This sounds a lot like an "if I can't explain it, I don't need to / not meant to". That's the kind of thinking that I most despise, and is one of religions uglier heads as far as I'm concerned.
  14. Standard memberOmnislash
    Digital Blasphemy
    Omnipresent
    Joined
    16 Feb '03
    Moves
    21533
    21 May '06 06:301 edit
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    Come on Omni, we all know you're not one to shy from a challenge! Can't understand the will of God? Rubbish. This sounds a lot like an "if I can't explain it, I don't need to / not meant to". That's the kind of thinking that I most despise, and is one of religions uglier heads as far as I'm concerned.
    No sir, it is basic rational. If one can not observe a thing one can not understand it. Would you assert otherwise?

    Edit: Not to say that we do not wish to understand it, or observe it. Simply that since we can not, it remains a mystery.
  15. Standard memberknightmeister
    knightmeister
    Uk
    Joined
    21 Jan '06
    Moves
    443
    21 May '06 10:25
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    Wrong. If free will is truely free and god exists at all points in time simultaneously, then it is an absolute logical requirement that universes in which each one of those choices is made differently exists. If this isn't the case, then only one universe exists, and there are no free choices.
    Can you tell me why it is an 'absolute logical requirement' . Why does the idea of only one universe existing mean that there is no potential for others to exist? You have yet to explain this sweeping assumption.

    You have written your post using a particular set of words in a particular order. Could you have written it differently? Just because you chose to write this particular set of words and it is only these words that exist in your post does not mean that a different set of words could not have existed. All you need for freedom is the POTENTIAL for different choices but you don't need all these choices to ACTUALLY exist , only the ones you actually make.

    Your argument seems circular and relies on an debatable assumption.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree