FMF: What does you thinking some people are "real pricks" have to do with God "forgiving" Christians for their "wicked and evil ways" rather than taking action against them?You started the "real pricks" thing, not me. If you say we are done with that red herring - or if introducing it into the conversation has served its purpose for you - that's fine by me. But saying you're done with that is just dodging the question: what did it have to do with to do with God "forgiving" Christians for their "wicked and evil ways" rather than taking action against them.
Originally posted by @kellyjay
Unless you have something to add to this I think we are done.
Originally posted by @fmfI'd say you are going to have to go back and review what we have gone over before, if you
You started the "real pricks" thing, not me. If you say we are done with that red herring - or if introducing it into the conversation has served its purpose for you - that's fine by me. But saying you're done with that is just dodging the question: what did it have to do with to do with God "forgiving" Christians for their "wicked and evil ways" rather than taking action against them.
didn't understand the first time I doubt you'll grasp it if I repeat.
Originally posted by @kellyjayYou have been stonewalling and deflecting my question about God "taking action against evil" when in fact - according to what you've been saying - He doesn't. I understand the generic dogma you've been throwing up. But it seems - by your behaviour - that you yourself don't understand it or its implications.
I'd say you are going to have to go back and review what we have gone over before, if you
didn't understand the first time I doubt you'll grasp it if I repeat.
Originally posted by @fmfNo, it isn't stonewalling and deflecting, its ignoring and rejecting.
You have been stonewalling and deflecting my question about God "taking action against evil" when in fact - according to what you've been saying - He doesn't. I understand the generic dogma you've been throwing up. But it seems - by your behaviour - that you yourself don't understand it or its implications.
Originally posted by @fmfLOL, yea right. You will not answer questions put to you for your reasons, and when you
I have been. I've been putting it to you in various ways post after post after post. But you've been deflecting, and pouting, and dodging, and all the rest. The points are all still there.
demand answers you feel you have already given then you refer back to them suggesting
they are there and don't give them.
So explain my errors, and actually stop your own dodging and deflecting.
Give me something to work with, or just acknowledge we are done because neither one
of us wants to go back and share what has already been shared. Unless once again the
things you hold yourself too are not the same as you hold others too.
Originally posted by @kellyjayI have been explaining to you. You are deflecting yet again.
LOL, yea right. You will not answer questions put to you for your reasons, and when you
demand answers you feel you have already given then you refer back to them suggesting
they are there and don't give them.
So explain my errors, and actually stop your own dodging and deflecting.
Give me something to work with, or just acknowledge we are done bec ...[text shortened]... ed. Unless once again the
things you hold yourself too are not the same as you hold others too.
Originally posted by @fmfYea, put up or shut up.
I have been explaining to you. You are deflecting yet again.
I'm asking for you to clearly show me the errors I've been making you have claimed I have.
I have told you that I have already answered your questions.
This is both of us asking the other to rehash something that have already been said.
I actually know I can produce what I have said to answer your questions.
I have no idea what you are talking about, but I'm willing to see them and be shown
what I have missed. So you can accuse me of deflecting or simply show me my errors
suggesting I have them without actually clearly pointing them out isn't doing anything
constructive, and it is hypocritical demanding something of someone you are not
willing to produce, I'm willing are you, if not than that choice is upon you.
Originally posted by @kellyjayI have been clear, explicit, consistent. You have been dodging for almost 2 weeks.
Yea, put up or shut up.
I'm asking for you to clearly show me the errors I've been making you have claimed I have.
I have told you that I have already answered your questions.
This is both of us asking the other to rehash something that have already been said.
I actually know I can produce what I have said to answer your questions.
I have no idea what ...[text shortened]... meone you are not
willing to produce, I'm willing are you, if not than that choice is upon you.