Originally posted by galveston75
Ok. Please direct me to a specific book, chapter and page that NOW has the absolute proof that one "kind" of animal has indeed changed to another "kind" that I can see with my own eyes.
Lol. Again no cheating though. No words like "we think" or "we suppose" or "maybe" or "it could have", etc ,etc, can be in the description of this new proof. Deal?
...[text shortened]... en hint that your evolution is indeed real. Never, ever!!!!!!
I'll be waiting as usual......
And yes, you can now be flicked off like a tick for the following reason.
Please post the most exhaustive account you like, or link to it, demonstrating the proof of God's existence (by which I mean your God, to the exclusion of all others). I will read it and see if I find it convincing and, if it is, I will acknowledge it. If not, I will explain why I do not find it convincing.
(By the way, if you are minded to accept the challenge, you must promise, if I fulfil my end, but only after, that you will read 'Why evolution is true' and give it a fair chance. See how easy it is to make a commitment that you know you will never have to honour? But it makes the serious point that I am willing to read something that you put in front of me that challenges my beliefs and you are not willing to do the same.)
You, by contrast, will not even spend a few hours reading something that challenges your beliefs.
That is the essential difference between some theists and the scientist. The scientist changes his beliefs to fit the available evidence, the theist interprets or ignores the available evidence to fit his beliefs.
Which is what you have just done.