Originally posted by @romans1009You are free to frame my posting record in whatever suits your purposes.
The troll speaks. And speaks. And speaks. And speaks.
But says nothing.
-Removed-What you posted to Romans1009 and I echoed back to you continues to apply:
<<You just refused to answer, presumably because you are unable to and are using your feigned indignation with me to avoid doing so.>>
And like Romans1009 your attempts to "justify" it are buffoonery of the highest order including this latest post of yours.
DG: <<Wow, you are having a go at me for not answering direct on topic questions...!>>
ToO: <<You really are too funny.
For one, you've been asking the same off-topic questions for weeks regardless of topic. Or as you just phrased it in your post on page 14:
" What about my other questions I’ve been asking you for weeks?"
Now you're going to pretend that they are "on topic"?
For another, you post so mindlessly that evidently you don't even recognize the words you had just posted to Romans1009 and I echoed back to you.
Classic DG buffoonery.>>
DG: <<I’m honest about what I am, you’re not. You are a fraud.>>
ToO: <<Feel free to actually address the questions at hand:
<<Do you think that what I presented in my previous post does not parallel and then logically extend the concepts set forth by God in Ezekiel 18? If so, how?>>
I imagine that if you could logically refute my position you would. But you can't - as evidenced by your buffoonery since.>>
The last two sentences bear repeating:
I imagine that if you could logically refute my position you would. But you can't - as evidenced by your buffoonery since.
-Removed-...and the buffoonery continues.
When it comes right down to it, you're little different from RC, FMJ, becker, Romans, et al.
The saddest thing is that in your mind's eye, you probably see yourself as being above them - if not well above them.
But as you've shown on this thread and others - you're not. It is what it is.
-Removed-Feel free to actually address the questions at hand:
<<Do you think that what I presented in my previous post does not parallel and then logically extend the concepts set forth by God in Ezekiel 18? If so, how?>>
I imagine that if you could logically refute my position you would. But you can't - as evidenced by your buffoonery since.
-Removed-Feel free to actually address the questions at hand:
<<Do you think that what I presented in my previous post does not parallel and then logically extend the concepts set forth by God in Ezekiel 18? If so, how?>>
I imagine that if you could logically refute my position you would. But you can't - as evidenced by your buffoonery since.
-Removed-You really are too funny.
For one, you've been asking the same off-topic questions for weeks regardless of topic. Or as you just phrased it in your post on page 14:
" What about my other questions I’ve been asking you for weeks?"
Now you're going to pretend that they are "on topic"?
For another, you post so mindlessly that evidently you don't even recognize the words you had just posted to Romans1009 and I echoed back to you.
Classic DG buffoonery.