10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @romans1009You are free to frame my posting record in whatever suits your purposes.
The troll speaks. And speaks. And speaks. And speaks.
But says nothing.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116970
10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterBump for Romans1009
What “independent research” did you carry out that confirmed to you that the “resurrection of Jesus Christ was true”?
10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterWhat you posted to Romans1009 and I echoed back to you continues to apply:
When you have the courage to admit what you are and answer the questions I’ve been asking you for weeks then, maybe, I’ll indulge you. Until then, you can shield the obvious shame your prior apostasy beneath this pseudo-academic veneer. But rest assured, I see you.
<<You just refused to answer, presumably because you are unable to and are using your feigned indignation with me to avoid doing so.>>
And like Romans1009 your attempts to "justify" it are buffoonery of the highest order including this latest post of yours.
DG: <<Wow, you are having a go at me for not answering direct on topic questions...!>>
ToO: <<You really are too funny.
For one, you've been asking the same off-topic questions for weeks regardless of topic. Or as you just phrased it in your post on page 14:
" What about my other questions I’ve been asking you for weeks?"
Now you're going to pretend that they are "on topic"?
For another, you post so mindlessly that evidently you don't even recognize the words you had just posted to Romans1009 and I echoed back to you.
Classic DG buffoonery.>>
DG: <<I’m honest about what I am, you’re not. You are a fraud.>>
ToO: <<Feel free to actually address the questions at hand:
<<Do you think that what I presented in my previous post does not parallel and then logically extend the concepts set forth by God in Ezekiel 18? If so, how?>>
I imagine that if you could logically refute my position you would. But you can't - as evidenced by your buffoonery since.>>
The last two sentences bear repeating:
I imagine that if you could logically refute my position you would. But you can't - as evidenced by your buffoonery since.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116970
Originally posted by @thinkofoneYou don’t have “a position” that’s my whole point. You’re a pretend follower of Jesus, a fake, a fraud.
I imagine that if you could logically refute my position you would.
10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @divegeester...and the buffoonery continues.
You don’t have “a position” that’s my whole point.
When it comes right down to it, you're little different from RC, FMJ, becker, Romans, et al.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116970
10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @thinkofoneOh dear, come on don’t get upset.
...and the buffoonery continues.
When it comes right down to it, you're little different from RC, FMJ, becker, Romans, et al.
Look, just be honest about “your position”
10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @divegeester...and the buffoonery continues.
Oh dear, come on don’t get upset.
Look, just be honest about “your position”
When it comes right down to it, you're little different from RC, FMJ, becker, Romans, et al.
The saddest thing is that in your mind's eye, you probably see yourself as being above them - if not well above them.
But as you've shown on this thread and others - you're not. It is what it is.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116970
10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @thinkofoneJust be open and honest about “your position” 🙂
...and the buffoonery continues.
When it comes right down to it, you're little different from RC, FMJ, becker, Romans, et al.
The saddest thing is that in your mind's eye, you probably see yourself as being above them - if not well above them.
But as you've shown on this thread and others - you're not. It is what it is.
10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterFeel free to actually address the questions at hand:
Just be open and honest about “your position” 🙂
<<Do you think that what I presented in my previous post does not parallel and then logically extend the concepts set forth by God in Ezekiel 18? If so, how?>>
I imagine that if you could logically refute my position you would. But you can't - as evidenced by your buffoonery since.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116970
10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @thinkofoneYou are free to “imagine” whatever you choose if if gives you some consolation. I am interested in why you won’t be open and honest about “your position”. Perhaps you are ashamed.
Feel free to actually address the questions at hand:
<<Do you think that what I presented in my previous post does not parallel and then logically extend the concepts set forth by God in Ezekiel 18? If so, how?>>
I imagine that if you could logically refute my position you would. But you can't - as evidenced by your buffoonery since.
I’ve heard it said that you are an apostate Jew; that must be tough dealing with family etc, but I guess you can always vent your angst on Christianity...huh.
10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterFeel free to actually address the questions at hand:
You are free to “imagine” whatever you choose if if gives you some consolation. I am interested in why you won’t be open and honest about “your position”. Perhaps you are ashamed.
I’ve heard it said that you are an apostate Jew; that must be tough dealing with family etc, but I guess you can always vent your angst on Christianity...huh.
<<Do you think that what I presented in my previous post does not parallel and then logically extend the concepts set forth by God in Ezekiel 18? If so, how?>>
I imagine that if you could logically refute my position you would. But you can't - as evidenced by your buffoonery since.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116970
10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @thinkofoneWhen you honestly answer the questions I’ve been asking you for weeks and which you have been avoiding, then I’ll consider debating you on other topics. It’s not complicated and repeating the same catchphrase over and over again doesn’t draw increased interest in your fakery.
Feel free to actually address the questions at hand:
<<Do you think that what I presented in my previous post does not parallel and then logically extend the concepts set forth by God in Ezekiel 18? If so, how?>>
I imagine that if you could logically refute my position you would. But you can't - as evidenced by your buffoonery since.
10 Mar 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterYou really are too funny.
When you honestly answer the questions I’ve been asking you for weeks and which you have been avoiding, then I’ll consider debating you on other topics. It’s not complicated and repeating the same catchphrase over and over again doesn’t draw increased interest in your fakery.
For one, you've been asking the same off-topic questions for weeks regardless of topic. Or as you just phrased it in your post on page 14:
" What about my other questions I’ve been asking you for weeks?"
Now you're going to pretend that they are "on topic"?
For another, you post so mindlessly that evidently you don't even recognize the words you had just posted to Romans1009 and I echoed back to you.
Classic DG buffoonery.