Go back
Is this the “mark” of the beast?

Is this the “mark” of the beast?

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @suzianne
Advertising? That's the huge down side for you?

Really? Are Christians just a bunch of 'boys who cry wolf' to you?




Even the Jews (at least a large portion of them) will 'come to Jesus' during the end times.
Again, I was not talking about the 'end times.' (Unless you think that will happen in the next 30 years? ).


-Removed-
Put your faith in God, tiger. Stop bumbling and fumbling around and looking for the solution to life’s problems at the bottom of an ale glass.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @kellyjay
Judging?
Of course. The wise Christian judges the words and actions of others so that he can determine who is false and who is not.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
All that is baloney. The only important criteria concerning this issue is that nothing and no one must be worshiped but God. Nothing in that scenario you and others are describing involves any form of worship or pledging allegiance to anyone.

People are fabricating scenarios to make it sound dramatic. Clearly they do not understand what Revelation is saying. Kelly Jay even changed what the bible says and added the word 'implant'. There is no such thing in the bible.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @rajk999
All that is baloney. The only important criteria concerning this issue is that nothing and no one must be worshiped but God. Nothing in that scenario you and others are describing involves any form of worship or pledging allegiance to anyone.

People are fabricating scenarios to make it sound dramatic. Clearly they do not understand what Revelation is sa ...[text shortened]... n changed what the bible says and added the word 'implant'. There is no such thing in the bible.
I didn't change the scripture I was speaking about it. If I quote scripture and change it, by
adding too or taking away from it that would be changing scripture. Speaking about an
event using my own words isn't altering text, they are going to put that mark on those
who take it, if it goes into the body it will be implanted. It is possible the mark remains
outside of the body and I'd be wrong about the word implanted.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @kellyjay
I didn't change the scripture I was speaking about it. If I quote scripture and change it, by
adding too or taking away from it that would be changing scripture. Speaking about an
event using my own words isn't altering text, they are going to put that mark on those
who take it, if it goes into the body it will be implanted. It is possible the mark remains
outside of the body and I'd be wrong about the word implanted.
This is adding to the bible:

The mark of the beast is in planted into the hand or forehead,...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @rajk999
This is adding to the bible:

The mark of the beast is in planted into the hand or forehead,...
What verse was I quoting? As I said, I was talking about the event. I did quote scripture
concerning that event, didn't alter it. If you want to read that again you should.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @kellyjay
What verse was I quoting? As I said, I was talking about the event. I did quote scripture
concerning that event, didn't alter it. If you want to read that again you should.
Yet another example of you misinterpreting the bible.
Then you tell others about your false teaching.
You are a false teacher.
Go learn the truth, then talk
Otherwise shut up.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @rajk999
This is adding to the bible:

The mark of the beast is in planted into the hand or forehead,...
To what chapter and verse are you referring to? Because I wasn’t quoting one!


-Removed-
Ignoring would be a better word.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @kellyjay
To what chapter and verse are you referring to? Because I wasn’t quoting one!
C'mon KJ

IIRC you've repeatedly admonished rajk for "adding to the bible" when he has similarly commented on scripture. Am I mistaken?

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @thinkofone
C'mon KJ

IIRC you've repeatedly admonished rajk for "adding to the bible" when he has similarly commented on scripture. Am I mistaken?
When quoting it and change the text or misrepresentating the meaning that is one thing, when you are not bringing up specific scripture and talking about an event is another.