@indonesia-phil saidSnakes can't talk.
I've yet to be convinced of the 'fact' that a snake can talk. If this is a 'let's pretend that snakes can talk' discussion, then you've lost my interest, and since I don't think your god exists the questions are academic.
It was Satan talking. "Serpent" is a metaphorical characterization of Satan.
That's all it is regardless of whether you or I or anyone else believes it is a true story or not.
@fmf saidEither you lack intellectual integrity, or you can't read.
So the serpent WAS metaphorical but ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING ELSE in the Garden of Eden story was LITERAL, right? Has my capitalization reflected your absolute certainty about this?
Serpent, as applied to the person of Satan, is a metaphorical characterization of Satan. Satan and serpent are the same literal person.
Try to comprehend.
@josephw saidThat depends, on how deep your question goes. One could argue that it doesn't matter whether there are gods or not, or whether the sun rises tomorrow. In the end nothing matters, but...Within the context of these discussions it matters; Kellyjay says that it was a snake, and that it spoke, so we atheists/agnostics are getting mixed signals from you Christians, who really should get your stories straight. If, as you say, the talking snake is a mere metaphor, then what else in the bible is mere metaphor; the virgin birth? The resurrection? Either the bible is literal truth or it isn't, you can't have your cake and eat it.
Does it matter?