Marital Rape

-Removed-

On the contrary it has fully exposed

1. your continued willingness to stifle intellectual debate by making matters personal
2. your inability to reason, rationally and logically
3. a truly Pharisaical propensity to moralize over anyone who does not share your own perspective
4. an unsavory tendency to fabricate values that no one has actually espoused
5. an inability to take responsibility for your own words when asked to substantiate them
6, a proclivity for making sensationalist tabloid sentiments like the above
7. a singular belief in nothing but your own propaganda displaying an inability to consider anything else
9. dishonest and vain attempts to use underhanded tactics like resorting to misrepresentation, slander and defamation of character
10. an unwillingness to consider any reason that your narrow moral perspective rejects not on the basis of any reason but on purely emotive terms

This list of course is not exhaustive and one can add, douchebaggery, plonkism, windbaggery and a whole host of other pejoratives that at present fail me.

Originally posted by FMF
Why would anyone have a "a morally and intellectually neutral position" on men raping their wives?

Did Sweden take a neutral stance during the second world war? why was that do you think? for the principle of neutrality is well known and understood.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
An insight into my inner workings because I resigned a couple of games of chess? Are you for real? LOL!!! What a wally.

yes feel free to throw any tantrums and games you like, nom nom nom back of da net!

Originally posted by FMF
Why would anyone have a "a morally and intellectually neutral position" on men raping their wives?

The answer to that, as I see it, is he's trolling. He has no genuine desire for a serious and sensible discussion, all of this, and all of what he posts is about trying to wind people up. He admitted on this forum he likes coming here to goad, ridicule, taunt and call people names. All this thread is, is an extension of his trolling.

See the comment above as evidence for my claim.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Did Sweden take a neutral stance during the second world war? why was that do you think?

What does this have to do with men raping their wives?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
The answer to that, as I see it, is he's trolling. He has no genuine desire for a serious and sensible discussion, all of this, and all of what he posts is about trying to wind people up. He admitted on this forum he likes coming here to goad, ridicule, taunt and call people names. All this thread is, is an extension of his trolling.

you do not understand the principle of neutrality? seriously?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
The answer to that, as I see it, is he's trolling. He has no genuine desire for a serious and sensible discussion, all of this, and all of what he posts is about trying to wind people up. He admitted on this forum he likes coming here to goad, ridicule, taunt and call people names. All this thread is, is an extension of his trolling.

But the topic is rape.

Originally posted by FMF
What does this have to do with men raping their wives?

it has everything to do with maintaining a neutral stance, what it has got to do with men raping their wives i cannot say, its your assertion not mine.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
it has everything to do with maintaining a neutral stance, what it has got to do with men raping their wives i cannot say, its your assertion not mine.

Why would anyone want to be "maintaining a neutral stance" over men raping their wives?

Originally posted by FMF
Why would anyone want to be "maintaining a neutral stance" over men raping their wives?

why would anyone maintain a neutral stance over anything, If you do not understand neutrality then i really cannot help you, sorry.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
why would anyone maintain a neutral stance over anything

I can understand being neutral over politics but why are you maintaining a neutral stance over men raping their wives? It's a moral atrocity.

Originally posted by FMF
But the topic is rape.

I know, it's bizarre and insensitive in the extreme.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
If you do not understand neutrality then i really cannot help you, sorry.

Do you also take "a morally and intellectually neutral position" about adults raping children?

Originally posted by FMF
I can understand being neutral over politics but why are you maintaining a neutral stance over men raping their wives? It's a moral atrocity.

I simply wish to remain absolutely detached personally from any controversy.

Originally posted by FMF
Do you also take "a morally and intellectually neutral position" about adults raping children?

I wish to remain neutral over any issue. I am uninterested in people like you and arguments like yours that seek at every instance to turn debate into a personal matter. i find it not only intellectually stifling and morally repellent, its a complete waste of time.