Morality without a deity.

@kellyjay said
My answers are not contradictory, if so show me.
You have my statements show the contradictions.

I already have.
Why should I show them to you again?
You are blinkered.
But worse you are deceitful.

@wolfgang59 said
I already have.
Why should I show them to you again?
You are blinkered.
But worse you are deceitful.

Nothing that you posted showed anything that I said was contradictory, and as I pointed out to you that you put the answers to your questions within your questions. There was no need for me to say yes to something I had already said that you quoted. If you want to drag this on point out where I'm in error, if you cannot, then you just prove this is for you something personal, because it isn't about the topics that discussed.

@kellyjay said
There was no need for me to say yes to something I had already said that you quoted.

New question.
Why will you not answer a simple question,
whether answered already or not, with Y or N?
Why?

Ashamed of your previous answer?
Can't remember your previous answer?
Have changed your mind?

@wolfgang59 said
New question.
Why will you not answer a simple question,
whether answered already or not, with Y or N?
Why?

Ashamed of your previous answer?
Can't remember your previous answer?
Have changed your mind?

yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

@darfius said
Huh? Methinks you don't grasp the concept of transitional. The point is we should be able to connect the morphological dots between all or at least most species with fossils showing the "transitions" between species. No dice. So it turns out the incestual Darwin, sponsored by the incestual British royals to provide an intellectual and physical basis for their occult theories of spiritual evolution, was probably making sh** up. And not very convincing sh**.

Wow, you are absolutely blinding me with your ignorance.

What school did you go to that you cannot even understand Darwinian evolution, much less actually speak about it? I'm guessing somewhere in Texas, probably a private school associated with a church. Am I close?

The point I was making, pinhead, is that sometimes there are no "transitional" fossils during speciation because those transitions are actually new species themselves. Do you get it now, or do I have to type more slowly?

@kellyjay said
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

To which question was that long Y?

@wolfgang59 said
New question.
Why will you not answer a simple question,
whether answered already or not, with Y or N?
Why?

Ashamed of your previous answer?
Can't remember your previous answer?
Have changed your mind?

Many times simple questions where the answers are only allowed for Y/N are not as simple as they are portrayed, since either answer can be used to run off for many things that had nothing do the heart of the one being questioned. If you are asking for a reason for something that then should be the question, not yes or no when either of those responses can be taken into some place that has nothing to do with reality.

@kellyjay said
Many times simple questions where the answers are only allowed for Y/N are not as simple as they are portrayed, since either answer can be used to run off for many things that had nothing do the heart of the one being questioned. If you are asking for a reason for something that then should be the question, not yes or no when either of those responses can be taken into some place that has nothing to do with reality.

Do you ever asked yes or no questions?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Do you ever asked yes or no questions?

Sure, clarifying answers, because meaning can be misunderstood even with a lengthy response. They shouldn't be used to trap, that isn't useful in any discussion where we are trying to understand.

@kellyjay said
Many times simple questions where the answers are only allowed for Y/N are not as simple as they are portrayed, since either answer can be used to run off for many things that had nothing do the heart of the one being questioned. If you are asking for a reason for something that then should be the question, not yes or no when either of those responses can be taken into some place that has nothing to do with reality.

Fair point. That is sometimes the case.
But the question
Did god create Hitler?
Surely only has a Y or N answer.

@wolfgang59 said
Fair point. That is sometimes the case.
But the question
Did god create Hitler?
Surely only has a Y or N answer.

Yes formed him in his mother’s womb.

@kellyjay said
Yes formed him in his mother’s womb.

Did God have knowledge of what he would become?

If yes, did He (indirectly at least) create evil?

@kellyjay said
Yes formed him in his mother’s womb.

And babies with ghastly deformities?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Did God have knowledge of what he would become?

If yes, did He (indirectly at least) create evil?

You really should watch those videos, yes.