01 Oct '10 10:28>1 edit
Originally posted by lauseyNeither am I.
I am not convinced Joe actually exists.
But I am betting there are so many religious nut idiots like that fictitious Joe that one of them is bound to be called “Joe”.
Originally posted by vishvahetuOnce again a post from you that, with some minor teaks, could have been written by a fundamentalist Christian:
The christians, are fundemental about pushing error onto everyone...I am presenting truth from the wisdom of Vedanta which is not error. (black and white)
For you to understand what I just said, you would have to travel the path of spirituality, until your acceptance of superstitious world beliefs where eradicated, then you will see the difference in f ...[text shortened]... st Vedanta teachings.
Until you explore and study Vedanta, you will not know the difference.
The [vedantists], are fundemental about pushing error onto everyone...I am presenting truth from the wisdom of [Christianity] which is not error. (black and white)
For you to understand what I just said, you would have to travel the path of [Christianity], until your acceptance of superstitious world beliefs where eradicated, then you will see the difference in [vedantan] teachings as against [Christian] teachings.
Until you explore and study [Christianity], you will not know the difference.
Originally posted by Andrew HamiltonThe cheating scientist has something to say, does he!......lets all hear his scientific explanation, of the existence of the universe and galaxies, and everything contained within.....and in exact detail, and dont leave anything out, because you are a scientist, and have all the test tubes and telescopes at your disposal, and I dont.
Neither am I.
But I am betting there are so many religious nut idiots like that fictitious Joe that one of them is bound to be called “Joe”.
Originally posted by vishvahetuMy earlier cynicism and cowardice that initially compelled me to avoid accepting ThinkofOne's challenge is vindicated by your post here.
So a watch needs a conscious intelligent desighn, but a galaxy doesnt...thats ignorance taken to infinitardum, something to expect from the cheating scientist.
Originally posted by AgergWow. Maybe there really isn't any backing down from a triple dog dare 🙂
Q Hullo Joe, glad you could make it.
A No problem, I have been very busy this week. [b]rehearsing vish's lines
Q What have you been up to?
A. I have just come from the 2010 International Design Award presentations in Hollywood.
Q. What can you tell us about that Joe?
A. Well every year we judge all of the terrific designs in technology, scienc the rest of your, sorry...Joe the "scientist"'s answers[/b]
[/b]
Originally posted by vishvahetuAnd yet another post that could have been written by a fundamentalist Christian.
So a watch needs a conscious intelligent desighn, but a galaxy doesnt...thats ignorance taken to infinitardum, something to expect from the cheating scientist.
Originally posted by vishvahetuAre you implying that it couldn't have been written by a fundamentalist Christian?
You band together chistianity and Vedanta, because it serves your dishonest, fault finding menatality.
Originally posted by vishvahetuMy question to you is simply how did god get here? To follow your logic, god, who is has vastly more capabilities than a channel changer, clearly must have been designed. If god could be here without being designed, is it not possible that some other entities could also exist without being design? And then, to go one step further, if other entities can exist without being designed, god is really not necessary! 667joe
Q Hullo Joe, glad you could make it.
A No problem, I have been very busy this week.
Q What have you been up to?
A. I have just come from the 2010 International Design Award presentations in Hollywood.
Q. What can you tell us about that Joe?
A. Well every year we judge all of the terrific designs in technology, science, industry and the arts.
Q ...[text shortened]... ou to understand, you should go and get a science degree, and then you will………..catch you later.
Originally posted by 667joeAfter the LSD trip is over, can you ask the question again!
My question to you is simply how did god get here? To follow your logic, god, who is has vastly more capabilities than a channel changer, clearly must have been designed. If god could be here without being designed, is it not possible that some other entities could also exist without being design? And then, to go one step further, if other entities can exist without being designed, god is really not necessary! 667joe