Originally posted by @kellyjay Try this!
If you stop and kill something it ends, if you leave it till the end you could end up with an
elderly man or woman. You can end a sperm, it will not become an old man or woman
if left along, the same thing is true with an egg. That is not true of fertilized egg, if that is
allowed to continue during its natural state a human man or woman will ...[text shortened]... ill off any
of them they never move on to the next stage of human life, you end the human life.
But it's okay when God kills someone, making them end, preventing a continuation to an elderly man or woman?
One rule for God, another for man, even though the Bible tells us to follow God's example of righteousness?
Originally posted by @eladar God created us all, God has the right to do as He wishes.
You believe God is no different than us.
The point is, God 'should' be different from us, by His very definition as the moral law giver. The argument that God can 'do what he likes' with his own creation is probably the most repugnant put forward by some Christians. - I would have no objection to the statement 'God could if He so wished' kill Mr X (in the sense that an omnipotent deity would have the power to do so) but not with the statement that God 'is at liberty to kill Mr X while maintaining his status as the moral law giver.' The Christian position that it's okay for God to tell us not to kill, but morally at liberty to do so Himself' (not subject 'to His own' moral code) is bordering on the bizarre.
A God, worthy of worship, would instruct us to 'do as I do, not just do what I say.'
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke The point is, God 'should' be different from us, by His very definition as the moral law giver. The argument that God can 'do what he likes' with his own creation is probably the most repugnant put forward by some Christians. - I would have no objection to the statement 'God could if He so wished' kill Mr X (in the sense that an omnipotent deity wou ...[text shortened]... izarre.
A God, worthy of worship, would instruct us to 'do as I do, not just do what I say.'
The point is God by definition is different from us. You don't like the fact that you are not God.
Originally posted by @eladar The point is God by definition is different from us. You don't like the fact that you are not God.
You are projecting, buddy. If you were charismatic you'd start a cult, but you aren't so you can't. We are spared from suffering another jones or koresh.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke The point is, God 'should' be different from us, by His very definition as the moral law giver. The argument that God can 'do what he likes' with his own creation is probably the most repugnant put forward by some Christians. - I would have no objection to the statement 'God could if He so wished' kill Mr X (in the sense that an omnipotent deity wou ...[text shortened]... izarre.
A God, worthy of worship, would instruct us to 'do as I do, not just do what I say.'
Originally posted by @kellyjay You know what God should do?
That is good advice for parents not God!
Where did I say I knew what God should do? I asked why He doesn't adhere to His own moral code (not mine) and behave as He tells us to behave? And why are you okay that He doesn't?