08 Oct 22
@fmf saidOdd considering you have not responded to the question, you talk around it a lot,
Everything I am posting is on-topic and so this is the thread where it belongs. To say that THIS thread is not for "those who see the world as something a mindless beginning", as you put it, is an unguarded revelation that you are not discussing this topic in good faith.
but never head-on except to say in a binary choice, one of them is right.
08 Oct 22
@kellyjay saidI have responded repeately but you refuse to address what I am contributing to the "conversation".
Odd considering you have not responded to the question, you talk around it a lot,
but never head-on except to say in a binary choice, one of them is right.
08 Oct 22
@fmf saidThis thread is about mindlessness or mind in the formation of life in this universe
Why can't you address what I am saying about anthropomorphization and your use of the word "mindlessness" but you are running away from it.
and you want to turn it into something else, start your thread, you have zero respect
for others, you want what you want and others must bow to your desires. There is
no respect from you when you constantly ignore others' desires to talk about what
they want to answer the whims of you, what a self-center, self-righteous, bag of
wind you are.
08 Oct 22
@kellyjay saidPerhaps you just don't know what "anthropomorphization" means and you are too proud to admit it?
Gee wiz, mind, mindlessness, not "anthropomorphization" start your thread maybe
someone will respond.
Perhaps you just don't understand the central role "anthropomorphization" plays in your disingenuous stance.
To suggest that you think that "anthropomorphization" needs to be NOT discussed with regard to THIS thread's topic and needs to be discussed on its own thread makes you look like a fool who doesn't really understand the topic you claim to want to talk about.
08 Oct 22
@kellyjay saidwhat a self-center, self-righteous, bag of wind you are.
There is
no respect from you when you constantly ignore others' desires to talk about what
they want to answer the whims of you, what a self-center, self-righteous, bag of
wind you are.
I am trying to talk to you about your concept of "mindlessness" but you are constantly running away.
08 Oct 22
@fmf saidIf that were true you wouldn’t be working into the conversation things that have nothing to do with the question.
what a self-center, self-righteous, bag of wind you are.
I am trying to talk to you about your concept of "mindlessness" but you are constantly running away.
08 Oct 22
1 edit
@kellyjay saidI have questioned your premise about "mind" versus "mindlessness" over and over again but you are just blanking it out and refusing to engage. Indeed, there's no evidence you are actually reading my posts.
If that were true you wouldn’t be working into the conversation things that have nothing to do with the question.
09 Oct 22
@fmf saidWell use little words, small sentences, because as far as I am concerned nothing about anything you have said addressed my query. If you are not able to tell the difference between an act of will and intelligence and the normal unfolding due to the laws we see in the universe. What’s your goal?
I have questioned your premise about "mind" versus "mindlessness" over and over again but you are just blanking it out and refusing to engage. Indeed, there's no evidence you are actually reading my posts.