Originally posted by RJHindsAnyone may believe. But I still think believing into Christ involves a supernatural transaction. Regeneration is a miracle.
It can't be a miracle because anyone can do it.
How would you feel about this passage ?
" Jesus answered and said to them, Do not murmur among yourselves. No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up in the last day." (See John 6:43,4)
Sometimes I think to myself "It is really a miracle that I believe this book." Do you ever feel that ?
- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
31 Dec 11
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYou are not accounting for a common oversight: We have no written document attributable to Jesus as the actual author. Everything said about him including everything we have in document form that he allegedly said, was written by some other author. In that day, these authors would be going often, on hearsay. There are many sources you can find where the historicity of these alleged acts and words of Jesus is brought into question.
[b]No Middle Ground
Christ was either who and what He claimed to be or he was the worst fraud and imposter
the world has ever known. No ordinary 'good man' would make such outrageous claims.
Boston Lad[/b]
Please do not forget that you are the one who started this thread analyzing and seeking a rational basis for the claims by and about Jesus. A rational basis would begin with the hypothesis that a natural set of human motivations led to the stories that were told, grew in their fabulous details, were written down about Jesus, then were eventually selected, by humans, for sanctification as the Word of God. Jesus didn't write a word of it. Even the words put into his mouth were written by others, based on their memories or how they imagined the events and words of Jesus would have fit their beliefs about him. Just as we each do today. Making Jesus into our own image of him. Theist and atheist alike.
Of course the Word of God could be argued to have been guided in truthfulness by God. And that's why it's called the Word of God. So you can have it your way, either way.
Nothing is resolved. No one's mind is changed.
Happy new year to all.
31 Dec 11
1 edit
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyI feel a more insightful evidence as to whom he claimed to be (and therefore the reason he was killed) is debated here:
[b]No Middle Ground
Christ was either who and what He claimed to be or he was the worst fraud and imposter
the world has ever known. No ordinary 'good man' would make such outrageous claims.
Boston Lad[/b]
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=142842&page=1
31 Dec 11
Originally posted by jaywillI never thought of it that way. However, I think athesist might think of
Anyone may believe. But I [b]still think believing into Christ involves a supernatural transaction. Regeneration is a miracle.
How would you feel about this passage ?
" Jesus answered and said to them, Do not murmur among yourselves. No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up in the last day." ( ...[text shortened]... I think to myself "It is really a miracle that I believe this book." Do you ever feel that ?
it as a miracle of stupidity.
31 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsMaybe to give some kind of mental assent or intellectual agreement does not involve the supernatural. But to receive the Person of Christ and be regenerated, I think, is a miracle of God.
I never thought of it that way. However, I think athesist might think of
it as a miracle of stupidity.
www.regenerated.net
Thankfully, the Father is so very willing to receive those who come to Christ.
31 Dec 11
Originally posted by divegeesterThere is no middle ground, divegeester. There is no debate. You yourself are in fact who and what you claim to be on these
I feel a more insightful evidence as to whom he claimed to be (and therefore the reason he was killed) is debated here:
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=142842&page=1
Red Hot Pawn Public Forums or you are an imposter, a poser and a fraud. Same with Christ during His earthly ministry.
.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYou are missing the point. Divegeester is in fact who and what he claims to be on these Red Hot Pawn Public Forums because he posts for himself and engages us without interpreters and intermediaries. So there is, as you say, no debate. However, if others were posting on his behalf, writing things about him, purportedly on his behalf, and still developing the meaning of what he said decades after his death - even though he'd written not word himself - then there would be, and is, a debate. Your OP offers a false dilemma. And that was, presumably, the entertainment that you were seeking to squeeze from it.
There is no middle ground, divegeester. There is no debate. You yourself are in fact who and what you claim to be on these Red Hot Pawn Public Forums or you are an imposter, a poser and a fraud. Same with Christ during His earthly ministry.
.