Originally posted by KellyJay
Scientist embrace the fact that the earth didn't look as it does now?
Yet you mock my saying that the earth was more likely different
before and after the flood. The only differences between my saying
it and scientists is the time line, the cause.
As far as what you think being a Christian is, I'm not sure I know what
you believe that to be. You never answered me when I asked you,
yet you question me about being one.
Kelly
Scientist embrace the fact that the earth didn't look as it does now?
Perhaps if you mean this in the 5000 years ago context then I agree that the earth did look very similar to the way it does now, (not including all the lights and roads and satellites and such). If you mean it in general, as in scientists think that the earth has always looked the same then I could no disagree more.
Yet you mock my saying that the earth was more likely different
before and after the flood.
I don't mock that. The earth should look extremely different before and after the flood. That's the problem. We don't find any geological or biological evidence of a mass extinction/diluvian castostrophe just 5000 years ago. What I do mock, or at least snicker at, is the idea of thousands upon thousands of ecological systems moving simultaneously across vast mud plains (dry or wet hardly matters) and mud puddles (i.e. oceans). That's just one of the myriad of reasons why the Flood story has no grounding in empirical evidence. If your god did it, then fine. Gods in all sorts of stories have performed any number of wild miracles. I just don't believe it.
The only differences between my saying
it and scientists is the time line, the cause.
I don't understand this. If a disaster of the type and proportions you describe actually occured then there should be so much evidence of it lying around that every geologist would feel ashamed to deny it. The evidence for the Flood should be found along so many disciplines and within so many varying fields of science that even a kid in elementary school would no of it. It should be found in geology, archealogy, biology, chemistry, astrophysics, paleontology, and history just to name a few. As for the earth, it has been very different at times (Ice Ages for example), but this is neither here nor there in regards to the total lack of evidence for the Flood.[/b]
As far as what you think being a Christian is, I'm not sure I know what
you believe that to be. You never answered me when I asked you,
yet you question me about being one.
Such a task is generally always fruitless. You are looking for a specific phrase. Whether I supply it or not, you will find something that makes you doubt my true salvation. It might be because I rested in my own strength instead of the Lords, followed a false xtian sect, lived it only as ceremony, or just never really believed. I just really don't want to get into that. What I have been trying to say is that too many xtians think that they have to throw out science to believe. They think their faith can only exist if evolution is false, and so they listen to and parrot any jack fool who tells them so. I think that's a real tragedy given that whether God used evolution or not to create man should not be such a central tenet of a xtians faith.
That's all I'm saying.