Originally posted by stellspalfie
"It is not meandering. It is working abainst opposition. "
who has the power to oppose god?
"Where would you be at 12:01 pm if God were to snap everything into His perfect will at 12:00 pm ?"
im sure gods not holding back the end of days just for me.
"What makes you think everyone ELSE is part of the problem besides you?"
what?
"By ...[text shortened]... i dont like him, he seems mentally unhinged.
who has the power to oppose god?
Satan - a being created once with superlative wisdom and beauty and great authority and a free will. He turned and became the nemisis against God Himself.
It seems that God allowed this being to be the great grand repository into which
all opposition against God is collected. This was a being who actually has the power to oppose God Himself.
I recommend
"The Invisible War" by Dr. Donald Barnhouse.
Or the first third of a book
"Earth's Earliest Ages" by G. H. Pember.
im sure gods not holding back the end of days just for me.
Not "just" for you. But you are certainly included.
"What makes you think everyone ELSE is part of the problem besides you?"
what?
You quip, " God should get on with the job and clear away all the sin. " [paraphrased]
"Let God arise, let His enemies be scattered" (Psalm 68:1)
What if you are part of the enemy ? Only a fool would not want to be reconciled to God first before He arises to scatter His enemies. Christ has come for the sinner's reconcilation to God.
"By the way, had God just created rocks, stones, and lower animals then maybe there would be no problem. A rock doesn't have the capacity to rebel."
or if he had created man and not given him the capacity to do evil.
That is an old philosophical argument that I cannot answer or do justice to in an Internet post. But would such a creature really be
free ?
"It took six days to form, recover, shape and mold His material creation in Genesis for it has no WILL. A rock, stone, or piece of wood gives God no problem. A man with a free will CAN give Him some problem."
why? i though god could do anything?
I didn't say God HAD to do it this way.
Perhaps He did it this way so we get the point. We look over the cycle of time and see the erecting of the great edifice of the world. Like a pyramid of life and meaning, we see all things gradually prepared and at the top, at the last - a MAN made in the image of God.
I think the ascending of the world in six days allows us to look down from the top of the pyramid and ascertain something of our place in the universe.
But there are more passages on God's creation than Genesis chapter one.
This particular chapter, however, follows that gradual unfolding and ascending scheme - six days.
"Or perhaps you wonder why God did not just create a race of robots. He pushes a button and they say "I Love You Creator."
i think blindly following your creator, doing exactly what he say is closer to behaving like a robot.
It would be. But since I do not follow "blindly" it does not apply.
Trust is not blind. Trust is full of sight and wisdom that the credentials of the trusted one are persuasive. I know nothing of so-called "Blind Faith".
Considering the credentials of Jesus Christ does not leave one "blind".
" I once was lost, but now I'm found;
Was blind, but now I see. "
(from the song Amazing Grace)
" No excuses for refusing His operation in MY heart now on His way.
Sinners and rebels always seem to want God to start with the OTHER guy over there"
what do you mean by start on the other guy? i have no desire of god to start anything on anybody.
You said that God should get busy on the job, like He is suppose to do, and clear up the evil in the world.
But you don't want Him to start with you. "Clear it all up. But leave ME alone entirely." That is the attitude I hear. "Its THOSE people doing THOSE things over there. Why are you standing by and letting it just happen."
One on one, Jesus Christ has a way to start changing
YOU. Why don't you realize that that is part of His operation to "FIX" it all ?
"The word of God says that the former things will not be remembered or come into mind"
so im right. the guilt will be so bad that memories need to be wiped for people to live in happiness. god will still know what he did though.
I don't see it that way. I see it as being so consumed with the present enjoyment and joy, especially at seeing how positively God worked out all the tragedies.
" And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are callked according to His purpose." (Rom. 8:28)
We can see that even history's worst crime, the murder of the Son of God, Jesus Christ, God turned to utilize for such a great salvation of man. We see how He turned that awful injustice for the greatest peace and eternal salvation of men and his environment. So we have condfidence that He can also cause all things to work together for good to those who are responding to His eternal purpose.
Imagine a chess master who is impossible to defeat and you may get an idea of the power of the God of resurrection to overcome every obstacle.
i dont think somebody who blindly follows something without question say to somebody who is asking questions that they lack objectivity.
A second time now I write it. We Christians know nothing of your so-called "Blind Faith".
That is YOUR assumption as one looking from the outside.
YOU assume we are following "blindly" just by a sheer will power, like the Wizard of Oz -
" I DO believe. I DO believe. I DO, I DO, I DO believe "
That is YOUR caricature. That is YOUR assumption - that I follow Christ "blindly".
No. Our trust in Jesus Christ is full of sight. And it is also accompanied by a certain amount of confirmation in our daily lives and as we look back over the years we have followed.
Faith and Trust which is full of sight, Not "blind following".
being able to see gods point of view doesnt make his point of view correct.
The idea of a incompetent God makes no sense. How could He give what He had not the capacity to give ? How could He make His creature MORE right when He has not the rightness to dispense ?
The idea of the CAUSE being inferior to the EFFECT has never been a convincing argument to me.
Besides, I can examine
Jesus Christ and see that there is no higher level of goodness to have ever walk this earth. He is worthy of my trust.
i read all the time, but im not keen on fairy stories.
This doesn't read like a "fairy story" to many of us:
"Now in the fifteenth year of the government of Tiberius Caesar, while Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, and Herod was tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip was tetrarch of the region of Ituraea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias was tetrarch of Abilene, during the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John the son of Zachariah in the wilderness." (Luke 3:1,2)
That reads like history to me rather than a "Once Upon a Time In a Far Off Land ..." [/b]
This reads lik Journalism to me -
"Inasmuch as many have undertaken to draw up a narrative concerning the matters which have been fully accomplished among us, Even as those who from the beginning became eyewitnesses and ministers ofthe word have delvered them to us, It seemed good to me also, having carefully investigated all things from the first, to write them out for you in an orderly fashion, most excellent Theophilus, So that you may fully know the certainty of the things concerning which you were instructed." (Luke 1:1-4)
This reads like journalism to me and not "fairy stories".
Those who call the New Testament "fairy stories" to me, do not display sober thinking.
Then we have the Apostle Peter's word that they in fact, did NOT follow
"cleverly devised myths."
"For we did not follow cleverly devised when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we became eyewitnesses of that One's majesty.
For He received from God the Father honor and glory, a voice such as this being borne to Him by the magnificent glory; This is My Son, My Beloved, in whom I delight.
And this voice we heard being borne out of heaven while we were with Him in the holy mountain." (2 Pet. 1:16-18)
EYEWITNESSES, NOT following
"cleverly devised myths".
so i should thank god that somebody else is suffering rather than me?
Well, if you INSIST on being sadistic about it, who can stop you.
Some of us help others and pray for others.
But if it bulsters up your skepticism to have a sick and sadistic approach, go ahead and be a sicko about it.
that sounds pretty damn cold and selfish.
You are stupid. So being thankful is damn cold and selfish ?
You think you're clever to exploit the MOST twisted and MOST perverted angle.
You think this is pretty clever of you ?
while im at it shall i thank god that a pedophile decided to rape and kill some other child rather than my daughter? should i thank him for my food, while he allows others to starve?
No. You could offer them Christian love, service, encouragement, and testimony how even in your own misfortunes God strenghtened you.
But since you have no experience and want none, you have nothing but your warped, perverted, twisted way to turn everything around. You are very clever at twisting everything around to use every conceivable spiritual opportunity to show how pitch black cynical your heart can be.
The God of resurrection can get down underneath even one who has suffered rape. If God could not get low enough to uphold even the rape victom then the crucifixion of Jesus would be rather pointless.
I met people who have had tragedies. I...