Originally posted by DasaAnd thus have all genocidal maniacs justified their actions.
I shall say it again.......................
Genocide is only applicable when the persons are innocent....
Originally posted by DasaDo you mean that even if your call was for the termination of all men and some women ~ but not all the women, and not the children ~ from a certain religious group, then - according to you - it would not be genocide? Is that what you mean?
True genocide means that everyone, and that means all men and all women and all children regardless of innocence or not will be slaughtered.
Originally posted by DasaSo, if it's not all Muslim men [regardless of whether they have committed crimes] that you are proposing to terminate pre-emptively, why do you say: Muslims converting to other religions at the eleventh hour would not be accepted ? If it's about the crimes, as you claim, then what does changing or retaining one's religion have to do with it?
Genocide is only applicable when the persons are innocent.... Islam is not innocent and is not worthy to exist among civilized people. When their behavior is lower than the animals they must be dealt with."
Originally posted by DasaSo if you are only talking about people who commit acts of terrorism and murder and so on, why did you say: "The Governments of the world should be pre-emptive and abolish Islam from the face of the earth. To do this, force must be used and termination of all Muslims would be the rule" ?
It means that every Muslim who is innocent of terrorism and murder and rape and kidnapping etc, are not included in CAPITAL PUNISHMENT................and why? because THEY ARE INNOCENT.
Originally posted by DasaBut if "...every Muslim who is innocent of terrorism and murder and rape and kidnapping etc, are not included..." in your termination plan, that will mean hundreds and hundreds of millions of Muslims will survive, so how will the termination plan result in "...abolishing Islam from the face of the earth" ?
The Governments of the world should be pre-emptive and abolish Islam from the face of the earth. To do this ..........force must be used and termination of all Muslims would be the rule.
Originally posted by DasaIf, as you say, Genocide is only applicable when the persons are innocent", and you only want to execute terrorists, murderers, rapists and kidnappers, how will this result in Islam being "eradicated" and "banned"?
"There can be no peace in this world until false religion is eradicated and true religion established. The most vile excuse for a religion is Islam and it must be banned."
Originally posted by DasaIf the people you seek to terminate are indeed only those guilty of serious crimes ~ and you wouldn't be eradicating them because of their religion ~ why do you specify that "Muslim children would be spared" ? Would guilty Muslim children be spared? Or would only innocent Muslim children be spared? And what does the Children's religion have to do with it?
Muslim children however would be spared [in the Muslim termination plan] because you can teach them truth and how to be civilized.
Originally posted by DasaIn what way would Muslim women have to "prove themselves" in order to avoid "termination" and why would Muslim men not be permitted to "prove themselves" too?
...force must be used and termination of all Muslims would be the rule. [...]Women would be allowed to prove themselves.
Originally posted by twhiteheadMy only fault is my poor use of grammar.
And thus have all genocidal maniacs justified their actions.
Given your long history of using English words in totally non-standard ways, I don't think anyone really cares how you wish to define 'genocide'. It remains a fact that you, on this forum expressed views that were genocidal in nature.
Originally posted by DasaThere is no quarter given here Dasa. Trolls like FMF will retrospectively cast anything up you have said in the past in an attempt to discredit you. Proper Knob is another who likes to engage in retrospective trolling.
My only fault is my poor use of grammar.
That I admit.
Let it go.
Originally posted by FMFYou absolute fool............
In what way would Muslim women have to [b]"prove themselves" in order to avoid "termination" and why would Muslim men not be permitted to "prove themselves" too?
If, during the "termination" you propose, Muslim women were spared along with their children, how would this result in Islam being "eradicated" by the governments of the world, which is y ...[text shortened]... t would you do with the male children when they became adults ~ would they then be "terminated"?[/b]