Originally posted by robbie carrobieCall on the name of who?
suck it up Doward,
(Romans 10:11-15) . . .For the Scripture says: “None that rests his faith on him will
be disappointed.” For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for there is
the same Lord over all, who is rich to all those calling upon him. For “everyone who
calls on the name of Jehovah will be saved.” However, how will they ca ...[text shortened]... Just as it is written:
“How comely are the feet of those who declare good news of good things!”
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindscall on the name Jehovah, its a direct quotation from Joel chapter 2:32, that is before
Call on the name of who?
Christ was manifest as a man, by, i dunno, about a thousand years! Hard to call on
someone's name before they are born, yah think!
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75hit and miss? you would be as well as putting a message in a bottle and hoping
Not needed but it sounds like a real hit and miss aproach to me. If humans life's are at stake and if one knows the days are short for this world we're in it would seem to be of most importance to ones who truly care about their fellow humans to tell all you can. That is our view. We spend over a billion hours a year doing this.
Nothing to brag about b dle of the dinner room where some might hear your voice but most wouldn't ????????????????
someone finds it as Raj coming up to you with a Biblical message of truth. The fact of
the matter remains, that the preaching and teaching work, as described by Christ and
Paul would be a global effort. Need a reference 😉
Originally posted by robbie carrobieExcept that the atonement is eternal. Sacrificing lambs before Jesus was born was symbolic... this is why Jesus is referred to as "the lamb of God"
call on the name Jehovah, its a direct quotation from Joel chapter 2:32, that is before
Christ was manifest as a man, by, i dunno, about a thousand years! Hard to call on
someone's name before they are born, yah think!
Originally posted by tomtom232yes indeed, however if you were too poor and could not afford a lamb, you could
Except that the atonement is eternal. Sacrificing lambs before Jesus was born was symbolic... this is why Jesus is referred to as "the lamb of God"
purchase a pair of doves instead, as did Jesus mother.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis means they new of Jesus since before he was born. His name before birth however was Immanuel and his name afterward was Joshua or Jesus. I would bank on Joshua as this name is much more common in that era than Jesus.
yes indeed, however if you were too poor and could not afford a lamb, you could
purchase a pair of doves instead, as did Jesus mother.
1 edit
Originally posted by tomtom232wut? actually Isaiah is probably more likely, even now in Arabic (closely related to Hebrew as it is spoken), the term for Jesus is Isa!
This means they new of Jesus since before he was born. His name before birth however was Immanuel and his name afterward was Joshua or Jesus. I would bank on Joshua as this name is much more common in that era than Jesus.