1. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    18 Nov '17 04:16
    Originally posted by @avalanchethecat
    Weak.
    Your answer is weak. 😵
  2. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    18 Nov '17 08:58
    Originally posted by @dj2becker
    Is it your subjective opinion that the Bible is ambivalent on the topic of rape or is it an objective fact?
    Print on a page is immutable and not subject to whoever is reading it.
  3. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    18 Nov '17 14:08
    Originally posted by @wolfgang59
    Print on a page is immutable and not subject to whoever is reading it.
    Tell that to FMF.
  4. Standard memberavalanchethecat
    Not actually a cat
    The Flat Earth
    Joined
    09 Apr '10
    Moves
    14988
    18 Nov '17 16:49
    Originally posted by @dj2becker
    Your answer is weak. 😵
    Your blind refusal to even consider addressing the corner you have painted yourself into is more revealing than any answer you could have concocted.
  5. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    18 Nov '17 18:10
    Originally posted by @wolfgang59
    Print on a page is immutable and not subject to whoever is reading it.
    It is your subjective opinion that the print on a page is ambivalent.
  6. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    19 Nov '17 01:16
    Originally posted by @dj2becker
    It is your subjective opinion that the print on a page is ambivalent.
    Explain to me how print can be ambivalent?
    Then explain how that changes depending upon the reader.
    Then lie down for a good while.
  7. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    19 Nov '17 04:021 edit
    Originally posted by @wolfgang59
    Explain to me how print can be ambivalent?
    Then explain how that changes depending upon the reader.
    Then lie down for a good while.
    Your 'interpretation' of the print is that it is ambivalent on the morality of rape. I reject your interpretation.
  8. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    19 Nov '17 18:57
    Originally posted by @dj2becker
    Your 'interpretation' of the print is that it is ambivalent on the morality of rape. I reject your interpretation.
    Answer the question.

    Explain to me how print can be ambivalent?
  9. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    20 Nov '17 02:12
    Originally posted by @dj2becker
    Tell that to FMF.
    No emoticon attached to your silly little blurt to wolfgang59 means you are actually serious. You are like a child who does not comprehend (or even recall) what the grown-ups around him have been talking about.
  10. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    20 Nov '17 03:29
    Originally posted by @wolfgang59
    Answer the question.

    Explain to me how print can be ambivalent?
    I'm saying your interpretation of the print is that it is ambivalent on the morality of rape. If you disagree, explain to me how print can be ambivalent without your interpretation that it is.
  11. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    20 Nov '17 07:28
    Originally posted by @dj2becker
    I'm saying your interpretation of the print is that it is ambivalent on the morality of rape. If you disagree, explain to me how print can be ambivalent without your interpretation that it is.
    You seem to think you are good (you're not) at knowing other people's thoughts,
    meanings and interpretations yet never tell us what yours are.

    You brought up the concept of print being ambivalent.

    And I would like to know what you mean by that absurdity.
  12. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    20 Nov '17 08:071 edit
    Originally posted by @wolfgang59
    You seem to think you are good (you're not) at knowing other people's thoughts,
    meanings and interpretations yet never tell us what yours are.

    You brought up the concept of print being ambivalent.

    And I would like to know what you mean by that absurdity.
    Avalancethecat is the one claiming that the Bible (print) is 'ambivalent' on the morality of rape so take it up with him.

    "And yet your scripture is notably ambivalent on this issue."
  13. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    20 Nov '17 09:13
    Originally posted by @dj2becker
    Avalancethecat is the one claiming that the Bible (print) is 'ambivalent' on the morality of rape so take it up with him.

    "And yet your scripture is notably ambivalent on this issue."
    He didn't say the print was ambivalent did he?
    You suggested that.
    Do you realise how stupid you were?
  14. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    20 Nov '17 09:40
    Originally posted by @wolfgang59
    He didn't say the print was ambivalent did he?
    You suggested that.
    Do you realise how stupid you were?
    When he said "And yet your 'scripture' is notably ambivalent on this issue", he was not referring to the print? 🙄
  15. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    20 Nov '17 10:07
    Originally posted by @dj2becker
    When he said "And yet your 'scripture' is notably ambivalent on this issue", he was not referring to the print? 🙄
    No he wasn't.
    If you think "scripture" and "print" are synonyms you are seriously fckd up.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree