question for the y.e.c

Originally posted by RJHinds
I could only speculate. Perhaps it is some type of artwork by God.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYpkbCgSNtU

The Instructor

You remind me exactly of the first people to look through Galilee's telescope where he clearly saw double stars and they said there was a flaw in the optics, even though there were clearly other stars that were singlets.

They refused to believe there could be such a thing as two stars near each other.

But they had the excuse of being hundreds of years in the past where all that was new. You have no such excuse.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I could only speculate. Perhaps it is some type of artwork by God.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYpkbCgSNtU

The Instructor

"I could only speculate. Perhaps it is some type of artwork by God."


comedy gold.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
I'm not sure anyone can be this stupid. You surely are trolling.

Actually, there are plenty of them in Congress.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I could only speculate. Perhaps it is some type of artwork by God.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYpkbCgSNtU

The Instructor

is it 3d? or is it just painted on the outer shell of our observable universe?
like a really good monet? or michelangelo's sixtine chapel?

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
is it 3d? or is it just painted on the outer shell of our observable universe?
like a really good monet? or michelangelo's sixtine chapel?

Ha. Take your pick.

The Instructor

Originally posted by wolfgang59
No.
You are the acknowledged master at that. As your post indicates.

So define nothing as it relates to the beginning of all things.
I do not think you will, I don't think you can.
Kelly

Originally posted by KellyJay
So define nothing as it relates to the beginning of all things.
I do not think you will, I don't think you can.
Kelly

I can, and have.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Ha. Take your pick.

The Instructor

this is how one does science in your happy land? declare truth whatever option seems more pleasant?

Originally posted by KellyJay
So define nothing as it relates to the beginning of all things.
I do not think you will, I don't think you can.
Kelly

Nothing, It's the absence of everything.

Including time, and space, the laws of physics... everything.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Actually, there are plenty of them in Congress.

OMG, RJ is a congressman?

Originally posted by sonhouse
OMG, RJ is a congressman?

not much of a reply from the yec's. can i take it from this that everybody apart from the caretaker crazy old mr hinds accept that planets form and life begins in the universe via the theories already laid out by science?