04 Jun '12 19:47>
Originally posted by JS357Ok that's fine.
It doesn't interest me.
Originally posted by menace71
This is fairly easy to understand. The women represents Israel and on a more basic level Mary but Israel whom the Messiah would be born through. Then the Serpent is persecuting the believers in God as it says and silly as it sounds I believe it's anger and jealousy that God has chosen mortal man not much more than glorified dirt balls with eyeballs 🙂 Also ...[text shortened]... l. one thousand two hundred and sixty days is the one part I'm as clear on.
Manny
Manny
The women represents Israel and on a more basic level Mary but Israel whom the Messiah would be born through.
Originally posted by galveston75No you miss read it's the serpent who is angry and jealous. I explained that on a lesser part it represented Mary but I really believe the women is Israel
Thanks Manny. So just a couple questions. The later part of verse 4 says the dragon or the Devil was standing before this woman so he could kill this child? So when did this happen in the events of Mary having Jesus back when he was born? There seems to be no menation of that in the accounts of the gosples that I can find. So let me know on that.
And I ...[text shortened]... mean? Is she up in heaven as some godess that has the moon and sun as her settings around here?
Originally posted by jaywillI'm sorry if I have done that and do hope you post here with this thread. Thanks. But I do ask that you post do relate to these verses.Well I think that is not a fair statement but I would be able to comment myself on this wouldn't I?
You have dismissed long paragraphs that I have labored on carefully as garbage nonsense in the most contemptuous way.
I mean if someone has some REASONS why they think and exegesis is off, I am willing to look at their reasons.
W ...[text shortened]... highly as I can.
I don't think you're going to like that. But the invitation is noted.
Originally posted by jaywillI mostly agree with you except the women diffidently represents Israel which can be said to be God's peopleThe women represents Israel and on a more basic level Mary but Israel whom the Messiah would be born through.
The woman as Israel is too restrictive. She must include more. The woman as Mary, I think is out of the question.
With the woman is universal LIGHT. She is CLOTHED with the sun. She has the moon underneath her feet. And a c ...[text shortened]... upon the earth throughout the ages. This is the Universal Bright Woman.
Stop here.
Originally posted by jaywillSorry Jaywill but you just completely lost me here. But going back to those verses it says she gives birth. I don't understand how this description lines up with the birth she has of the lamb who is Jesus but not in a literal sence. As you said this is not speaking of Mary at all. This cannot of course be a real person because of all the other descriptions given here. Also this representaion of a woman has to flee for her life or existance and finally is hid by God as is said in verse 6.The women represents Israel and on a more basic level Mary but Israel whom the Messiah would be born through.
The woman as Israel is too restrictive. She must include more. The woman as Mary, I think is out of the question.
With the woman is universal LIGHT. She is CLOTHED with the sun. She has the moon underneath her feet. And a c ...[text shortened]... upon the earth throughout the ages. This is the Universal Bright Woman.
Stop here.
Originally posted by menace71Ok thanks. But look at these scriptures and see if the literal Israel is still in God's favour. Remember, they never accepted Jesus as the messiah and were behind his death..
Both is what I believe
Manny
Originally posted by JS357Thanks and it does me too. It's a tuff one to explain but it was put in the Bible for a reason. It's not just there to throw us a curve ball and mess with our minds but it has to be understood and with the rest of Revelation pointing to some really bad things happeneing, we should understand it in the way God intendend. But why was it written in this way?
But what does interest me is what other people think about it. So thanks for bringing it up.
Originally posted by galveston75I was taught one reason that the book called Revelation is important to the Bible is that in it, we are told that the Bible, with this book, is complete and will not be added to, and if anyone tries to pass something off as if we should add it to the Bible, they are wrong. Please feel free to tell me if this teaching was incorrect.
Thanks and it does me too. It's a tuff one to explain but it was put in the Bible for a reason. It's not just there to throw us a curve ball and mess with our minds but it has to be understood and with the rest of Revelation pointing to some really bad things happeneing, we should understand it in the way God intendend. But why was it written in this way?