-Removed-Yes they worshipped the "young child" not a baby. The bible clearly says it was at their home where they found him. They had no intent on harming Jesus and this is the reason they did not go there directly from Herod and the reason they did not return to Herod as he had ordered them to do.
Again this is not what this thread is about is it? I'm discussing the star and who was behind it existing and leading them to Jesus. It was not something God did as the intent of this star was to lead Herod to Jesus in order to have him killed.
So who would want him killed in the grand scheme of things and is against anything God has purpossed especially with his son to one day be the King of his Fathers Kingdom? And what better chance to have Jesus killed then when he was a baby and defenceless? Satan was the one behind this star.....
Sorry you do not get that.
-Removed-I use the word fool honestly with quite a bit of experiance in dealing with you....
You show no interest in learning anything about the bible and you deny Jehovah. The bible clearly calls ones a "fool" who take this stand. Hence it is an honest description I think.
If you don't like my postings, then ignor them.
Originally posted by galveston75If they found Jesus at their home then that would be Nazareth, right?
Yes they worshipped the "young child" not a baby. The bible clearly says it was at their home where they found him. They had no intent on harming Jesus and this is the reason they did not go there directly from Herod and the reason they did not return to Herod as he had ordered them to do.
Again this is not what this thread is about is it? I'm discus ...[text shortened]... s a baby and defenceless? Satan was the one behind this star.....
Sorry you do not get that.
http://news.discovery.com/history/religion/jesus-christ-nazareth-house.htm
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsMatt 2:19 explains the events: 19 When Herod had died, look! Jehovah’s angel appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt
If they found Jesus at their home then that would be Nazareth, right?
http://news.discovery.com/history/religion/jesus-christ-nazareth-house.htm
20 and said: “Get up, take the young child and his mother and go into the land of Israel, for those who were seeking the life of the young child are dead.”
21 So he got up and took the young child and the child’s mother and entered into the land of Israel.
22 But hearing that Ar·che·laus ruled
Ju·dea instead of his father Herod, he was afraid to go there. Moreover, being given divine warning in a dream, he withdrew into the territory of
Gali·lee.
23 And he came and settled in a city named Naza·reth, in order to fulfill what was spoken through the prophets: “He will be called a Naz·a·rene.”
No they would have found them still living in Bethlehem in a home as they had not yet moved to Nazareth....
Originally posted by galveston75So after the birth they were able to rent a house in Bethlehem for awhile before fleeing to Egypt and then returning to Nazareth. Is that right?
Matt 2:19 explains the events: 19 When Herod had died, look! Jehovah’s angel appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt
20 and said: “Get up, take the young child and his mother and go into the land of Israel, for those who were seeking the life of the young child are dead.”
21 So he got up and took the young child and the child’s mother and entered in ...[text shortened]... ld have found them still living in Bethlehem in a home as they had not yet moved to Nazareth....