1 edit
Originally posted by @rajk999Yeah that's a classic. Seems like being illogical is a requirement for being able to believe the doctrine that they are taught.
Exactly... one of the more hilariously ridiculous arguments is that he cannot follow the commandments because Jesus did not say how much to do to get saved.
What's particularly cringe worthy is how dishonest he is with his incessant mischaracterizations of people's positions, mischaracterizations of what people have or haven't said in the past, the false accusations and so on. It's really pathetic.
Originally posted by @thinkofoneClassic psychological projection.
Yeah that's a classic. Seems like being illogical is a requirement for being able to believe the doctrine that they are taught.
What's particularly cringe worthy is how dishonest he is with his incessant mischaracterizations of people's positions, mischaracterizations of what people have or haven't said in the past, the false accusations and so on. It's really pathetic.
Or are you following Saul Alinsky’s advice to accuse others of that which you’re guilty of.
But wait - you forgot to say “cogent argument.”
Bad boy!
Originally posted by @thinkofoneHere is something to think about. Gods boys are those like Abraham and David. Yet you constantly find fault with them.
Yeah that's a classic. Seems like being illogical is a requirement for being able to believe the doctrine that they are taught.
What's particularly cringe worthy is how dishonest he is with his incessant mischaracterizations of people's positions, mischaracterizations of what people have or haven't said in the past, the false accusations and so on. It's really pathetic.
You are on the other side.
1 edit
Originally posted by @romans1009Right on cue and just as I was saying...
Classic psychological projection.
Or are you following Saul Alinsky’s advice to accuse others of that which you’re guilty of.
But wait - you forgot to say “cogent argument.”
Bad boy!
Originally posted by @rajk999Did you inadvertently respond to the wrong post?
Here is something to think about. Gods boys are those like Abraham and David. Yet you constantly find fault with them.
You are on the other side.
Originally posted by @thinkofoneLOL
Did you inadvertently respond to the wrong post?
The two Christ deniers are getting confused. Come on, fellas. It’s not that hard!
Originally posted by @rajk999I don’t “constantly find fault” with them. I just said they’re not sinless as rajk and you claim. And I backed up my position with the Bible.
Here is something to think about. Gods boys are those like Abraham and David. Yet you constantly find fault with them.
You are on the other side.
Nice!
Originally posted by @thinkofoneWhat happened to “cogent argument?” You were supposed to say that!
Right on cue and just as I was saying...
Originally posted by @romans1009Did i say they were sinless?
I don’t “constantly find fault” with them. I just said they’re not sinless as rajk and you claim. And I backed up my position with the Bible.
Nice!
Originally posted by @romans1009Classic lol. Did you inadvertently respond to the wrong post?
I don’t “constantly find fault” with them. I just said they’re not sinless as rajk and you claim. And I backed up my position with the Bible.
Nice!
Originally posted by @rajk999As I'm sure you're aware, neither did I, but Romans has repeatedly shown that the facts don't matter to him.
Did i say they were sinless?
The fact is that I wrote the following:
"Yet many Christians will deny that any human can truly obey God, i.e., cease to commit sin."
Yet Romans responded and continues to respond as if I had said that Abraham had never sinned. It's part and parcel of his repeated dishonesty - which no doubt will continue.
Originally posted by @thinkofoneIf you’ve got something to say, just plainly state your case and make a “cogent argument.”
As I'm sure you're aware, neither did I, but Romans has repeatedly shown that the facts don't matter to him.
The fact is that I wrote the following:
"Yet many Christians will deny that any human can truly obey God, i.e., cease to commit sin."
Yet Romans responded and continues to respond as if I had said that Abraham had never sinned. It's part and parcel of his repeated dishonesty - which no doubt will continue.
See how easy that was?
Originally posted by @thinkofoneYou and ToO are so similar. The only difference is you spew industrial-strength hate like a geyser, while ToO limits his hate to just bearing false witness against others.
Classic lol. Did you inadvertently respond to the wrong post?
2 edits
-Removed-
It’s called free thinking sonship,
I have freedom of thinking. And with that freedom, on some matters, I arrive at different opinions from you.
You cannot define "free thinking" as always in agreement with Divegeester?
Now if in my "free thinking" you persuade me that something thought is wrong, well, that is a possibility. And it should run both ways. And it could be that both of us could use some correction somewhere.